(re)Vision Visual Culture

REFERENCES

• Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. doi:10.1086/345321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seeing. London, England: BBC/Harmondsworth, Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Bersson, R. (2008). For cultural democracy: A critique of elitism in art education. In K. Keifer-Boyd, M. Emme, & j. jagodzinski (Eds.), InCITE/InSIGHT/InSITE: Journal of Social Theory in Art Education, the first 25 years (pp. 19–24). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bolin, P., & Blandy, D. (2003). Beyond visual culture: Seven statements of support for material culture studies in art education. Studies in Art Education, 44(3), 246–263.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Camfield, D. (2014). Theoretical foundations of an anti-racist queer feminist historical materialism. Critical Sociology, 42(2), 289–306. doi:10.1177/0896920513507790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, G. (2005). Visual culture education in the 1960s. Art Education, 58(6), 6–11.
   Google Scholar
• Darts, D. (2004). Visual culture jam: Art, pedagogy, and creative resistance. Studies in Art Education, 45(4), 313–327.
   Google Scholar
• Duncum, P. (2001a). Visual culture: Developments, definitions, and directions for art education. Studies in Art Education, 42(2), 101–112. doi:10.2307/1321027
   Google Scholar
• Duncum, P. (2001b). How are we to understand art at the beginning of the twenty-first century? In P. Duncum & T. Bracey (Eds.), On knowing: Art and visual culture (pp. 15–33). Christchurch, New Zealand: Canterbury University.
   Google Scholar
• Duncum, P. (2002a). Clarifying visual culture art education. Art Education, 55(3), 6–11. doi:10.2307/3193995
   Google Scholar
• Duncum, P. (2002b). Visual culture art education: Why, what and how. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 21(1), 14–23. doi:10.1111/1468-5949.00292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncum, P. (Ed.). (2006). Visual culture in the art class: Case studies. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J., & Hall, S. (1999). Visual culture. The reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications and The Open Press University.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, K. (2003). Teaching visual culture. Curriculum, aesthetics and the social life of art. New York, NY, and Reston, VA: Teachers College Press and the National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, J. (1980). Established ways of thinking. Caucus on Social Theory and Art Education, Atlanta Papers, 1, 3–11.
   Google Scholar
• jagodzinski, j. (2004). Youth fantasies: The perverse landscape of the media. New York, NY: Palgrave Press.
   Google Scholar
• jagodzinski, j. (Ed.). (2017). The precarious future of education: Risks and uncertainty in ecology, curriculum, learning, and technology. New York, NY: Palgrave McMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Keifer-Boyd, K. (2007). Body interfaces in curriculum. In S. Springgay & D. Freedman (Eds.), Curriculum and the cultural body (pp. 51–60). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Keifer-Boyd, K. (2010). Visual culture and gender constructions. The International Journal of Arts Education, 8(1), 1–44. (In English 1-24 & Chinese 25-44)
   Google Scholar
• Keifer-Boyd, K. (2012). Feminist Web 2.0 pedagogy: Collaborations that sustain difference. In C. Bitzer, S. Collingwood, A. E. Quintana, & C. J. Smith (Eds.), Feminist cyberspaces: Pedagogies in transition (pp. 251–272). Newcastle, England: Cambridge Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Keifer-Boyd, K. (2014). Enacting critical media literacy with machinima making: Body<self-referential organization>Landmark. In M. Stokrocki (Ed.), Exploration in virtual worlds: New digital multi-media literacy investigations for art education (pp. 105–112). Reston, VA: The National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Keifer-Boyd, K., Emme, M., & jagodzinski, j. (2008). InCITE/InSIGHT/InSITE: Journal of Social Theory in Art Education, the first 25 years. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Keifer-Boyd, K., & Maitland-Gholson, J. (2007). Engaging visual culture. Worcester, MA: Davis Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Keifer-Boyd, K., & Maitland-Gholson, J. (2010). Engaging visual culture. (Kyoyookkwahaksa, Trans.). Seoul, South Korea: Eric Yang Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Keifer-Boyd, K., & Smith-Shank, D. (2017). Born digital: Visual culture & gender. Visual Arts Research, 43(1), 17–35. doi:10.5406/visuartsrese.43.1.0017
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J. L. (2003). Says who? Who decides what is art? In K. Rose & J. L. Kincheloe (Eds.), Art, culture, & education: Artful teaching in a fractured landscape (pp. 49–104). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Lanier, V. (1966). New media and the teaching of art. Art Education, 19(4), 4–8. doi:10.2307/3190788
   Google Scholar
• Mamur, N. (2015). Pedagogical approaches to visual culture in Turkish preservice education. Studies in Art Education, 56(4), 355–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFee, J. K. (1961). Preparation for art. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• McFee, J. K., & Degge, R. (1977). Art, culture and environment: A catalyst for teaching. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media. New York, NY: Signet Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mirzeoff, N. (Ed.). (2002). Visual culture reader (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge. (Original work published 1998)
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, P. (2005). How to read Marx. London, England: Granta.
   Google Scholar
• Paatela-Nieminen, M., & Keifer-Boyd, K. (2015). Transcultural intra-action. In M. Kallio-Tavin & J. Pullinen (Eds.), Conversations on Finnish art education (pp. 304–317). Helsinki, Finland: School of Arts, Design and Architecture Aalto ARTS books.
   Google Scholar
• Pohjakallio, P. (2002). New and old: Multimedia as a tool for providing interpretation and meaning: Reflections on the Finnish art education history project. Journal of Art and Design Education, 17(3), 303–310. doi:10.1111/1468-5949.00139
   Google Scholar
• Smith-Shank, D. L. (Ed.). (2004). Semiotics and visual culture: Sights, signs, and significance. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Sturkin, M., & Cartwright, L. (2001). Practices of looking: An introduction to visual culture (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tavin, K. (2001). Swimming up-stream in the jean pool: Developing a pedagogy towards critical citizenship in visual culture. Journal of Social Theory in Art Education, 21(1), 129–158.
   Google Scholar
• Tavin, K. (2005). Hauntological shifts: Fear and loathing of popular (visual) culture. Studies in Art Education, 46(2), 101–117.
   Google Scholar
• Toffoletti, K. (2007). Cyborgs and Barbie dolls: Feminism, popular culture and the posthuman body. London, England: I. B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar