Socially Engaged Art and Its Pedagogy of Citizenship

References

• Arendt, H. (2018). Thinking without a banister: Essays in understanding, 1953-1975 ( J. Kohn, Ed.). New York, NY: Schocken Books.
   Google Scholar
• Aria, S., & Pedlar, A. (2003). Moving beyond individualism in leisure theory: A critical analysis of concepts of community and social engagement. Leisure Studies, 22, 185–202. doi:10.1080/026143603200075489
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act ( V. Liapunov, Trans.). In V. Liapunov and M. Holquist (Eds.). Austin: University of Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: A revolutionary approach to man’s understanding of himself. New York, NY: Ballantine.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, C. (1994). The subversive imagination. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial hells: Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. London, UK: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Borgmann, A. (1992). Crossing the postmodern divide. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice ( R. Nice, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham, L. F. (1989). Hands across skid row: John Malpede’s performance workshop for the homeless. In A. Raven (Ed.), Art in the public interest (pp. 55–88). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, A., Group Material, Illuminato, M., Martinez, D. J., Wilson, F., & Levi Strauss, D. (1997). Points of entry: Three rivers arts festival. In M. J. Jacob (Ed.). Pittsburgh, PA: Three Rivers Arts Festival.
   Google Scholar
• Congdon, K., Blandy, D., & Bolin, P. (2001). Histories of community-based art education. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Crary, J. (2001). Suspensions of perception: Attention, spectacle, and modern culture. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Crossley, N. (2013). Habit and habitus. Body and Society, 19(2&3), 136–161. doi:10.1177/1357034X12472543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? ( H. Tomlinson and G. Burchell, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Donne, J. (1839). Devotions upon emergent occasions: Meditation XVII. In H. Alford (Ed.), The works of John Donne, Volume III (pp. 574–575). London, UK: John W. Parker. Retrieved from www.luminarium.org/sevenlit/donne/meditation17.php
   Google Scholar
• Dowd, M. (2018, July 7). For whom the trump tolls. The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, E. (1999, June 15). Spirit house art aims to bring people together. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Retrieved from http://old.post-gazette.com/magazine/19990615spirit1.asp
   Google Scholar
• Eliot, T. S. (1925). The hollow men. Retrieved from https://allpoetry.com/The-Hollow-Men
   Google Scholar
• Fabric Workshop and Museum. (2006). Lonnie Graham: A conversation at the table. Retrieved from www.fabricworkshopandmuseum.org
   Google Scholar
• Felshin, N. (1995). But is it art? The spirit of art as activism. Seattle, WA: Bay.
   Google Scholar
• Fontanella, M., & Grenier, C. (2018). Return to figuration (wall text and press-kit). Giacometti exhibition (June 8, 2018–September 12, 2018). Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York, NY. Retrieved from http://www.guggenheim.org/press-room/press-kits
   Google Scholar
• Garoian, C. R. (2012). Sustaining sustainability: The pedagogical drift of art research and practice. Studies in Art Education, 53(4), 283–301. doi:10.1080/00393541.2012.11518870
   Google Scholar
• Garoian, C. R. (2014). In the event that art and teaching encounter. Studies in Art Education, 54(1), 384–396. doi:10.1080/00393541.2014.11518947
   Google Scholar
• Graham, L. (2018). Public art: Garden projects. Unpublished manuscript, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, G. A. (1999). Vernacular voices: The rhetoric of publics and public spheres. Columbia: University of South Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Helguera, P. (2011). Education for socially engaged art: A materials and techniques handbook. New York, NY: Jorge Pinto Books.
   Google Scholar
• Illich, I. (1973). Tools for conviviality. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Isin, E. F. (2008). Theorizing acts of citizenship? In E. F. Isin & G. M. Nielsen (Eds.), Acts of citizenship (pp. 15–43). London, UK: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, M. J. (2005). Reciprocal generosity. In T. Purves (Ed.), What we want is free: Generosity and exchange in recent art (pp. 3–10). Albany: State University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, M. J., & Mosaka, T. (n.d.). Evoking history: Listening across cultures and communities. Retrieved from www.nyu.edu/classes/bkg/web/spoleto.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kalin, N. M. (2018). The neoliberalization of creativity education: Democratizing, destructuring and decreating. London, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kester, G. H. (2013). Conversation pieces: Community and communication in modern art. Berkeley: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Lacy, S. (1995). Mapping the terrain: New genre public art. Seattle, WA: Bay.
   Google Scholar
• Lacy, S., & Allen, S. (1983/1984). Whisper, the waves, the wind [Performance art installation]. Retrieved from www.suzannelacy.com
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York, NY: Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, H. (1972). One dimensional man. London, UK: Abacus.
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2010, December). On critique. Inflexions: Transversal Fields of Experience, 4, 337–340. Retrieved from www.inflexions.org/n4_Brian-Massumi-on-Critique.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. (1995). This is to enrage you: Gran Fury and the graphics of AIDS activism. In N. Felshin (Ed.), But is it art? The spirit of art as activism (pp. 5–83). Seattle, WA: Bay.
   Google Scholar
• NAMES Project. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NAMES_Project_AIDS_Memorial_Quilt
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, G. M. (2002). The norms of answerability: Social theory between Bakhtin and Habermas. Albany: State University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, G. M. (2008). Answerability with cosmopolitan intent: An ethics-based politics for acts of urban citizenship. In E. F. Isin & G. M. Nielsen (Eds.), Acts of citizenship (pp. 266–286). London, UK: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Paulson, S. (2016, July 29). Critical intimacy: An interview with Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak [Transcript]. Retrieved from https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/critical-intimacy-interview-gayatri-chakravorty-spivak
   Google Scholar
• Poole, B. (2001). From phenomenology to dialogue: Max Scheler’s phenomenological tradition and Mikhael Bakhtin’s development from ‘Toward a philosophy of the act’ to his study of Dostoevsky. In K. Hirschkop & D. Shepherd (Eds.), Bakhtin and cultural theory (pp. 109–135). Manchester, UK: Manchester University.
   Google Scholar
• Purves, T. (2005). What we want is free: Generosity and exchange in recent art. Albany: State University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science and Politics, 28(4), 664–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2001). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, A. (1989). Art in the public interest. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Schjeldahl, P. (2018, June 18). Giacometti’s skinny sublime. The New Yorker. Retrieved from www.newyorker.com
   Google Scholar
• Slivka, K. (2012). Disequilibrium in arts and arts education: Sustainability as loss through giving. Studies in Art Education, 53(4), 302–316. doi:10.1080/00393541.2012.11518871
   Google Scholar
• Swisher, K. (2018, August 2). The expensive education of Mark Zuckerberg and Silicon Valley. The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com
   Google Scholar
• White, M. (2008). Can an act of citizenship be creative? In E. F. Isin & G. M. Nielsen (Eds.), Acts of citizenship (pp. 44–56). London, UK: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar