Creative and Critical Entanglements With AI in Art Education

References

• AIArtists.org. (n.d.). Our featured artists. https://aiartists.org/ai-artist-founding-members
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard-Wills, K., & Barnard-Wills, D. (2012). Invisible surveillance in visual art. Surveillance & Society, 10(3/4), 204–214. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v10i3/4.4328
   Google Scholar
• Berry, D. M. (2014). Critical theory and the digital. Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buolamwini, J., & Gebru, T. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 81, 77–91.
   Google Scholar
• Cahill, S. (2020). Making visible the creative forms of surveillance. Surveillance & Society, 18(1), 135. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v18i1.13777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celis, C. (2020). Critical surveillance art in the age of machine vision and algorithmic governmentality: Three case studies. Surveillance & Society, 18(3), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v18i3.13410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerella, A. (2019, July 25). Dressing for a machine-readable world: An interview with Adam Harvey. Security Dialogue. https://blogs.prio.org/SecurityDialogue/2019/07/dressing-for-a-machine-readable-world-an-interview-with-adam-harvey
   Google Scholar
• Cetinic, E., & She, J. (2022). Understanding and creating art with AI: Review and outlook. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications, 18(2), Article 66. https://doi.org/10.1145/3475799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, S. (2019, September). Why I draw with robots [Video]. TED. https://www.ted.com/talks/sougwen_chung_why_i_draw_with_robots
   Google Scholar
• Colton, S., & Wiggins, G. A. (2012). Computational creativity: The final frontier? In L. De Raedt, C. Bessiere, D. Dubois, P. Doherty, P. Frasconi, F. Heintz, & P. Lucas (Eds.), Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications (Vol. 242, pp. 21–26). IOS Press. http://ebooks.iospress.nl/volume/ecai-2012
   Google Scholar
• Decuypere, M., Alirezabeigi, S., Grimaldi, E., Hartong, S., Kiesewetter, S., Landri, P., Masschelein, J., Piattoeva, N., Ratner, H., Simons, M., Vanermen, L., & Vanden Broeck, P. (2023). Laws of edu-automation? Three different approaches to deal with processes of automation and artificial intelligence in the field of education. Postdigital Science and Education, 5, 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00360-x
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations, 1972–1990 (M. Joughin, Trans.). Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dinkins, S. (n.d.-a). Conversations with Bina48, 2014–ongoing. https://www.stephaniedinkins.com/conversations-with-bina48.html
   Google Scholar
• Dinkins, S. (n.d.-b). Biography. https://www.stephaniedinkins.com/about.html
   Google Scholar
• Dufva, T. S. (2023). Entanglements in AI art. In A. D. Knochel & O. Sahara (Eds.), Global media arts education: Mapping global perspectives of media arts in education (pp. 181–196). Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05476-1_11
   Google Scholar
• Dufva, T., & Dufva, M. (2019). Grasping the future of the digital society. Futures, 107, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Sautoy, M. (2019). The creativity code: Art and innovation in the age of AI. Belknap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M., & Breines, M. (2023). Unpacking the hidden curricula in educational automation: A methodology for ethical praxis. Postdigital Science and Education, 5, 56–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00342-z
   Google Scholar
• Gangneux, J. (2014). Diverted and diverting glances at cameras: Playful and tactical approaches to surveillance studies. Surveillance & Society, 12(3), 443–447. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i3.4959
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, P. (2023). Enacting empowerment through an automated teaching event: A posthuman and political perspective. Postdigital Science and Education, 5, 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00346-9
   Google Scholar
• Grant, R. (1995). Values, means and ends. In R. Fellows (Ed.), Philosophy and technology (pp. 177–188). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunkel, D. J. (2012). The machine question: Critical perspectives on AI, robots, and ethics. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunkel, D. J. (2020). An introduction to communication and artificial intelligence. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gunkel, D. J. (2021). Computational creativity: Algorithms, art, and artistry. In E. Navas, O. Gallagher, & x. burrough (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of remix studies and digital humanities (pp. 385–395). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millenium.FemaleMan(c)_Meets_Oncomouse(tm): Feminism and technoscience. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, A. (n.d.). CV Dazzle. https://adam.harvey.studio/cvdazzle
   Google Scholar
• Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature and informatics. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hertzmann, A. (2018). Can computers create art? Arts, 7(2), Article 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts7020018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Introna, L. (2017). Phenomenological approaches to ethics and information technology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2017 Ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/ ethics-it-phenomenology
   Google Scholar
• Jesup, C. S. (2017). Adapting art critiques to address digital harm. Visual Arts Research, 43(1), 76–85. https://doi.org/10.5406/visuartsrese.43.1.0076
   Google Scholar
• Keifer-Boyd, K., Knochel, A. D., Patton, R. M., & Sweeny, R. W. (2018). Posthumanist movement art pedagogy: Geolocative awareness and co-figurative agency with mobile learning. Studies in Art Education, 59(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2017.1406227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knochel, A. D. (2016). Photoshop teaches with(out) you: Actant agencies and non-human pedagogy. Visual Arts Research, 42(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.5406/visuartsrese.42.1.0071
   Google Scholar
• Knochel, A. D., & Patton, R. M. (2015). If art education then critical digital making: Computational thinking and creative code. Studies in Art Education, 57(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393541.2015.11666280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knochel, A. D., & Sahara, O. (Eds.). (2023). Global media arts education: Mapping global perspectives of media arts in education. Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05476-1
   Google Scholar
• Kondor, Z. (2016). New media, old concerns: Heidegger revisited. In J. Floyd & J. E. Katz (Eds.), Philosophy of emerging media: Understanding, appreciation, application (pp. 132–145). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, N. (2020). Entanglement art education: Factoring ARTificial intelligence and nonhumans into future art curricula. Art Education, 73(4), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2020.1746163
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, N. (2021). Emerging artificial intelligence, art and pedagogy: Exploring discussions of creative algorithms and machines for art education. Digital Culture & Education, 13(1), 20–41.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, T. E., & Hyland, P. B. (2022). Studious drift: Movements and protocols for a postdigital education. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Licklider, J. C. R. (1960, March). Man-computer symbiosis. IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, (1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1109/THFE2.1960.4503259
   Google Scholar
• Lu, L.-F L. (2005). Pre-service art teacher negative attitudes and perceptions of computer-generated art imagery: Recommendations for pre-service art education programs. Visual Arts Research, 31(1), 89–102.
   Google Scholar
• Lukaszewicz, A., & Fortuna, P. (2022). Towards Turing test 2.0—Attribution of moral status and personhood to human and non-human agents. Postdigital Science and Education, 4, 860–876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00303-6
   Google Scholar
• Mazzone, M., & Elgammal, A. (2019). Art, creativity, and the potential of artificial intelligence. Arts, 8(1), Article 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/arts8010026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack, J., Gifford, T., & Hutchings, P. (2019). Autonomy, authenticity, authorship and intention in computer generated art. In A. Ekárt, A. Liapis, & M. L. Castro Pena (Eds.), Computational intelligence in music, sound, art and design (pp. 35–50). Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16667-0_3
   Google Scholar
• Mizota, S. (2017, November 28). Alexa, meet Lauren: L.A. artist turns her apartment into an experiment in artificial intelligence. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/arts/la-et-cm-lauren-mccarthy-review-20171127-story.html
   Google Scholar
• Monahan, T. (2018). Ways of being seen: Surveillance art and the interpellation of viewing subjects. Cultural Studies, 32(4), 560–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2017.1374424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, R. (1994). Aesthetics for young people: Problems and prospects. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 28(3), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.2307/3333397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navas, E. (2021). Machine learning and remix: Self-training selectivity in digital art practice. In T. Gartmann & M. Schäuble (Ed.), Studies in the arts—Neue Perspektiven auf Forschung über, in und durch Kunst und Design (pp. 191–204). Transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839457368-013
   Google Scholar
• Navas, E. (2022). The rise of metacreativity: AI aesthetics after remix. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbet, N. (2004). Resisting surveillance: Identity and implantable microchips. Leonardo, 37(3), 210–214. https://doi.org/10.1162/0024094041139463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Paglen, T. (2016, December 8). Invisible images (your pictures are looking at you). The New Inquiry. https://thenewinquiry.com/invisible-images-your-pictures-are-looking-at-you
   Google Scholar
• Patton, R. M., & Buffington, M. L. (2016). Keeping up with our students: The evolution of technology and standards in art education. Arts Education Policy Review, 117(3), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632913.2014.944961
   Google Scholar
• Paul, C. (2008). Digital art (2nd ed.). Thames & Hudson.
   Google Scholar
• Pearlman, E. (2021). Is there a place in human consciousness where surveillance cannot go? Noor: A brain opera. Leonardo, 54(5), 542–546. https://doi.org/10.1162/leon_a_02008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pente, P., Adams, C., & Yuen, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence, ethics, and art education in a posthuman world. In A. D. Knochel & O. Sahara (Eds.), Global media arts education: Mapping global perspectives of media arts in education (pp. 197–211). Springer International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05476-1_12
   Google Scholar
• Pošćić, A., & Kreković, G. (2020). Unboxing the machine: Artificial agents in music. Computation, Communication, Aesthetics & X. xCoAx, 285–298.
   Google Scholar
• Preston, J. (2022). Artificial intelligence in the capitalist university: Academic labour, commodification, and value. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rensfeldt, A. B., & Rahm, L. (2023). Automating teacher work? A history of the politics of automation and artificial intelligence in education. Postdigital Science and Education, 5, 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00344-x
   Google Scholar
• Roland, C. (2010). Preparing art teachers to teach in a new digital landscape. Art Education, 63(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2010.11519049
   Google Scholar
• Romano, G. (2021). Algorithmia: Art in the era of artificial intelligence. http://netescopio.meiac.es/algoritmia/ e-algoritmia.html
   Google Scholar
• Roose, K. (2022, September 2). An A.I.-generated picture won an art prize. Artists aren’t happy. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/09/02/technology/ai-artificial-intelligence-artists.html
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, T., & Rea, N. (2018, September 25). Has artificial intelligence given us the next great art movement? Experts say slow down, the “field is in its infancy.” Artnet News. https://news.artnet.com/art-world/ai-art-comes-to-market-is-it-worth-the-hype-1352011
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N., Hillman, T., Bergviken-Rensfeldt, A., & Perrotta, C. (2023). Making sense of the digital automation of education. Postdigital Science and Education, 5, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00362-9
   Google Scholar
• Shinseungback Kimyonghun. (n.d.). Nonfacial portrait. https://ssbkyh.com/works/nonfacial_portrait
   Google Scholar
• Song, B., & Koo, A. (2022). Paradigm shift: Artificial intelligence, contemporary art, and implications for gifted arts education. Journal of Gifted Education in Arts, 8, 5–38. https://doi.org/10.22752/KRIGA.2022.08.001
   Google Scholar
• Stark, L., & Crawford, K. (2019). The work of art in the age of artificial intelligence: What artists can teach us about the ethics of data practice. Surveillance & Society, 17(3/4), 442–455. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v17i3/4.10821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeny, R. (2020). “Investigate the misusage of technology as a gesture of freedom”: Glitch dysfunction in new media art and art education. Visual Arts Research, 46(2), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.5406/visuartsrese.46.2.0015
   Google Scholar
• Tavin, K., Kolb, G., & Tervo, J. (Eds.). (2021). Post-digital, post-internet art and education: The future is all-over. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Technavio. (2022, August). Artificial intelligence market in the education sector in US by end-user and education model—Forecast and analysis 2022–2026. Retrieved December 17, 2022, from https://www.technavio.com/report/artificial-intelligence-market-in-the-education-sector-in-us-industry-analysis
   Google Scholar
• Vold, K., & Harris, D. R. (2021). How does artificial intelligence pose an existential risk? In C. Véliz (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of digital ethics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198857815.013.36
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.
   Google Scholar