Evaluating Five Consolidants for Black-Dyed Māori Textile Artefacts

References

• ADInstruments. 2016. version 7.3.8. LabChart 7. Dunedin, NZ: ADInstruments.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. 2015. Accessed 5 June, 2020. https://tri-funori.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Ashley-Smith, J., A. Derbyshire, and B. Pretzel. 2002. “The Continuing Development of a Practical Lighting Policy for Works of Art and Paper and Other Object Types at the Victoria and Albert Museum.” In ICOM Committee for conservation 13th Triennial meeting, Rio de Janeiro, Preprints, edited by R. Vontobel, 3–8. London: James and James..
   Google Scholar
• Baker, C. A. 2007. “Sodium Carboxymethylcellulose (SCMC) Re-Evaluated for Paper, Book, Papyrus and Parchment Conservation.” The Book and Paper Group Annual 26: 177–185.
   Google Scholar
• Banik, G. 2009. “Scientific Conservation: Transfer of Scientific Research on Ink Corrosion to Conservation Practice - Does it Take Place?” Restaurator 30: 131–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, K. 2002. “Iron Gall and the Textile Conservator. Strengthening the Bond: Science and Textiles.” Preprints of the North American Textile conservation Conference, Philadelphia, United States of America.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, K., and K. Thompson. 2014. “The Consolidation of Mud-Silk: A Southeast Asian Textile.” Studies in Conservation 59: S1–S4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution. 1990. BS 1006: 1990. Methods of Test for Colour Fastness of Textiles and Leather. UK-TN. Colour Fastness to Artificial Light: Mercury Vapour Fading Lamp Test (Withdrawn December 2010). London: British Standards Institution.
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution. 1993. BS EN 20105-A02 1993 ISO 105-A02: 1987 Textiles – Tests for Colour Fastness. Part A02 Grey Scale for Assessing Change in Colour. London: British Standards Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, Antonio, Nazareth Fonseca, Sheyla Carvalho, Fernanda Santos, Luana Barki, Denise Freitas, Marcelo Herbst, and Márcia Lutterbach. 2013. “Archaeometric Investigations on Naturally and Thermally-Aged Iron-Gall Inks Using Different Tannin Sources.” Open Chemistry 11 (11): 1729–1739.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, V. 1997. 1997/5 The Conservation and Deterioration of Black Dyed New Zealand Flax Part 1: The Degradation Mechanism. British Museum Report No 1997/5. London: Department of Conservation, British Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, V. 1998. The Deterioration and Conservation of Black Dyed New Zealand Flax Part 2: Stabilisation Treatments. British Museum Report No 1998/24. London: Department of Conservation, British Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, V. 1999a. “Factors Affecting the Deterioration of the Cellulosic Fibres in Black-Dyed New Zealand Flax (Phormium Tenax).” Studies in Conservation 44: 73–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, V. 1999b. “Stabilisation Treatments for Black-Dyed New Zealand Flax.” In ICOM Committee for Conservation, Triennial Meeting, Lyon Preprints, edited by J. Bridgland, 579–584. London: James & James.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, V., and J. Potter. 1998. The Conservation of Black Dyed Phormium Tenax Part 3: Mechanical Properties. British Museum Report No. 1998/23. London: Department of Conservation, Brithish Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, A., and G. W. Brown. 2012. “Paraloid B-72: Practical Tips for the Vertebrate Fossil Preparator.” Collection Forum 26: 99–119.
   Google Scholar
• DuPont. 2017. “Chemistry of METHOCEL. Cellulose Ethers – A Technical Review.” DuPont Nutrition and Biosciences. Accessed 16 July 2017. https://www.pharma.dupont.com/content/dam/dupont/amer/us/en/nutrition-health/general/pharmaceuticals/documents/Download_Technical%20Information%20on%20METHOCEL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Erhardt, D., and M. F. Mecklenburg. 1995. “Accelerated vs Natural Aging: Effect of Aging Conditions on the Aging Process of Cellulose.” In Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, 247–270. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feller, R. L., and M. Wilt. 1990. Evaluation of Cellulose Ethers for Conservation. Marina del Rey, CA, USA: Getty Conservation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Fenton, G. A., I. J. Miller, G. J. Smith, and R. Te Kanawa. 2004. “Colour Stabilizing Effect of Zinc Alginate Consolidant on Black Iron-Tannate Dyed Maori Textiles.” In AICCM 2nd Biennial Textile Symposium, Preprints, 61–64. Canberra: Australian Institute for the Conservation of Cultural Material.
   Google Scholar
• Garside, P., and P. Wyeth. 2005. Assessing the Physical State of the Fore-Topsail of HMS Victory. In Scientific Analysis of Ancient & Historic Textiles. Informing Preservation, Display and Interpretation. Postprints, edited by R. Janaway, and P. Wyeth. Southampton: AHRB Research Centre for Textile Conservation & Textile Studies, Textile Conservation Centre. 118–125.
   Google Scholar
• Geiger, T., and F. Michel. 2005. “Studies on the Polysaccharide JunFunori Used to Consolidate Matte Paint.” Studies in Conservation 50: 193–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallett, K., and S. Bradley. 2003. “Ultraviolet-Filtered Lighting and Cellulose Degradation: Evaluating the Effect of Light Exposure on Ethnographic Collections.” The Conservator 27: 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Hayakawa, N., K. Kida, T. Ohmura, N. Yamamoto, K. Kusunoki, and W. Kawanobe. 2014. “Characterisation of Funori as a Conservation Material: Influence of Seaweed Species and Extraction Temperature.” Studies in Conservation 59: S230–S231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofenk de Graaff, J. H., W. Roelofs, and MRv Bommel. 2004. “Dyeing and Writing; A Comparison of the use and Degradation of Iron-Gall Complexes on Textiles and Paper.” In The Colourful Past: Origins, Chemistry and Identification of Natural Dyestuffs, edited by J. H. Hofenk de Graaff, 31–41. Switzerland; London: Archetype Publications; Abegg-Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Horie, C. V. 1987. Materials for Conservation: Organic Consolidants, Adhesives and Coatings. London: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Hummert, E., U. Henniges, and A. Potthast. 2013. “Fluorescence Labeling of Gelatin and Methylcellulose: Monitoring Their Penetration Behavior Into Paper.” Cellulose 20: 919–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Corporation. 2016. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, New York: IBM Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• International Organisation for Standardisation. 1994. ISO 105-A01:1994(E) Textiles – Tests for Colour Fastness. Part A01 General Principles of Testing Edition. 5. Geneva: International Organisation for Standardisation.
   Google Scholar
• Lenth, R. V. 2018. Emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
   Google Scholar
• Llamas, R., and D. R. San Pedro. 2014. “Colorimetric Evaluation of Three Adhesives Used in the Consolidation of Contemporary Matte Paint After Artificial Ageing.” Conservar Património 20: 11–21.
   Google Scholar
• Luxford, N., and D. Thickett. 2011. “Designing Accelerated Ageing Experiments to Study Silk Deterioration in Historic Houses.” Journal of the Institute of Conservation 34: 115–127.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A., V. Rouchon, T. Aubry, N. Cauliez, Marthes Desroches, and M. Margez. 2011. “Local Strenghtening of Mould-Damaged Manuscripts: A Case Study on Logbooks of Early French Expeditions in Louisiana (1684–1722).” Journal of Paper Conservation 12 (1): 21–29.
   Google Scholar
• Michalski, S. 2008. “A Physical Model of the Consolidation Process, Particularly of Paintings. The Care of Painted Surfaces. Materials and Methods for Consolidation, and Scientific Methods to Evaluate Their Effectiveness.” Proceedings of the CESMAR Conference, Milan, November, 2006, Milan. 27–47.
   Google Scholar
• Michalski, S., and C. Dignard. 1997. “Ultrasonic Misting. Part 1, Experiments on Appearance Change and Improvement in Bonding.” Journal of the American Institute for Conservation 36: 109–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, F. 2011. “Funori and JunFunori: Two Related Consolidants with Surprising Properties.” Adhesives and Consolidants for Conservation: Research and Applications, CCI Symposium, The Canadian Conservation Institute, Ottawa, Canada. 27–47.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, W. E., and J. W. S. Hearle. 2008. “Tensile Properties.” In Physical Properties of Textile Fibres, 274–321. 4th ed. Manchester: The Textile Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa. 2001. “Preventive Conservation”. In Te Papa National Services Resource Guides | He Rauemi. Accessed 21 April 2016. https://www.tepapa.govt.nz/sites/default/files/5-preventative-conservation_3.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Padfield, T. 2004. “The Preservation Index and the Time Weighted Preservation Index.” Accessed 26 June, 2017. http://www.conservationphysics.org/twpi/twpi_01.php.
   Google Scholar
• Porck, H. J. 2000. Rate of Paper Degradation. The Predictive Value of Artificial Aging Tests. Amsterdam: European Commission on Preservation and Access.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2018. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Sato, M., S. Okubayashi, and M. Sato. 2011. “Development of Conservation Procedures for Late Edo Period Japanese Ceremonial Dolls’ Hair: Evaluation of Effective Treating Reagents by Using Artificially Degraded Black-Dyed Silk Fibres.” Journal of Cultural Heritage 12: 157–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawoszczuk, T., A. Barański, J. M. Łagan, T. Łojewski, and K. Zięba. 2008. “On the use of ASTM Closed Vessel Tests in Accelerated Ageing Research.” Journal of Cultural Heritage 9: 401–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheele, S. 2005. Harakeke the Rene Orchiston Collection. 3rd ed. Lincoln: Manaaki Whenua Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shashoua, Y. 1995. “Cellulose Ethers for Textile Conservation.” In Starch and Other Carbohydrate Adhesives for use in Textile Conservation, edited by P. Cruickshank, and Z. Tinker, 1–5. London: United Kingdom Institute for Conservation. Textile Section.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. A., R. A. Paterson, B. J. Lowe, and R. Te Kanawa. 2016. “(Published Online 2016; in Print 2018). Consolidation of Black-Dyed Māori Textile Artefacts: Evaluating the Efficacy of Sodium Alginate.” Studies in Conservation 63 (3): 139–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, C. H., and P. M. Whitmore. 2013. “Comparison of the Degradation Behavior of Cotton, Linen, and Kozo Papers.” Cellulose 20: 1099–1108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swider, J. R., and M. Smith. 2005. “Funori: Overview of a 300-Year-old Consolidant.” Journal of the American Institute for Conservation 44: 117–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TALAS. 2017. Methocel A4C Mixing Instructions. Accessed 17 April, 2017. https://www.talasonline.com/images/PDF/Instructions/methocel_A4C_mixing_inst.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tamarapa, A. 2011. Whatu Kakahu: Maori Cloaks. pp. 53. Wellington: Te Papa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Te Kanawa, D. 1992. Weaving a Kakahu. Wellington: Bridget Williams Books in Association with Aotearoa Moananui a Kiwa Weavers.
   Google Scholar
• Te Kanawa, R. 2001. “Conservation of Māori Textiles Decorated with Traditional Dyes.” In American Institute for Conservation, 29th Annual Meeting, Postprints, edited by J. L. Merritt, and V. J. Whelan, vol. 11, 1–10. Washington: The Textile Specialty Group Postprints.
   Google Scholar
• Te Kanawa, R. 2005. “Consolidation of Degraded Iron-Tannate Dyed Phormium Tenax Fibres Using Zinc Alginate.” Unpublished Masters of Science thesis, Victoria University of Wellington.
   Google Scholar
• Te Kanawa, R. 2015. 16 February [personal communication]. Wellington: Te Papa Tongarewa National Museum of New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Te Kanawa, R., G. J. Smith, G. A. Fenton, I. J. Miller, and C. L. Dunford. 2008. “Evaluation of Consolidants for Black Iron Tannate-Dyed Maori Textiles.” Dyes in History and Archaeology 21: 225–230.
   Google Scholar
• Te Kanawa, R., S. Thomsen, G. Smith, I. Miller, C. Anadry, and D. Cardon. 2002. “Traditional Maori Dyes.” Dyes in History and Archaeology 18: 47–50.
   Google Scholar
• Tse, S. 2007. “Guidelines for pH Measurement in Conservation.” In CCI Technical Bulletin No. 28. Ottawa: Department of Canadian Heritage.
   Google Scholar
• Travis, K. 2008. “Consolidants for dry Archaeological Organics.” In The Conservation DistList, edited by LmS Devine: Foundation of the American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works (FAIC). Accessed 24 April 2017. https://cool.culturalheritage.org/byform/mailing-lists/cdl/2008/1347.html.
   Google Scholar
• TRI-Funori. 2017. How to Re-Hydrate TRI-Funori FD. Accessed 17 April, 2017. https://tri-funori.com/faq/.
   Google Scholar
• Vuori, J., and S. A. Tse. 2004. “Preliminary Study of a Micro Extraction Method for Measuring the pH of Textiles.” ICOM Textile Working Group Newsletter 19: 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, H., C. Carr, and M. Hacke. 2012. “Production and Validation of Model Iron-Tannate Dyed Textiles for use as Historic Textile Substitutes in Stabilisation Treatment Studies.” Chemistry Central Journal 6: 44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang, H. H. 2006. “Polyamide Fibers.” In Handbook of Fiber Chemistry, edited by M. Lewin, 107–108. 3rd ed. Boca Rafton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar