External error modelling with combined model in terrestrial laser scanning

References

• Bähr, H., Altamimi, Z. and Heck, B. 2007. Variance component estimation for combination of terrestrial reference frames. Schriftenreihe des Studiengangs Geodäsie und Geoinformatik, Universität Karlsruhe.
   Google Scholar
• Baltsavias, E. P. 1999. Airborne laser scanning: basic relations and formulas. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 54(2), pp.199–214. doi: 10.1016/S0924-2716(99)00015-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deems, J. and Painter, T. 2006. Lidar measurement of snow depth: accuracy and error sources. In: Proceedings of the International Snow Science Workshop, Telluride, CO, USA, October 2006, pp.1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Eling, D. 2009. Terrestrisches Laserscanning für die Bauwerksüberwachung. PhD. DGK, Reihe C, Nr. 641. München.
   Google Scholar
• Fowles, G. R. 1975. Introduction to modern optics. New York: Holt McDougal.
   Google Scholar
• Gruen, A. and Beyer, H. A. 2001. System calibration through self-calibration. In: Calibration and orientation of cameras in computer vision. New York, Springer, pp.163–93.
   Google Scholar
• Hampel, F. R., Ronchetti, E. M., Rousseeuw, P. J. and Stahel, W. A. 2011. Robust statistics: the approach based on influence functions. Vol. 114. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hennes, M. and Ingensand, H. 2000. Komponentenkalibrierung versus Systemkalibrierung. In: Proceedings of the XIII International Course on Engineering Surveying, 166–177.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse, C. and Kutterer, H. 2006. Automated form recognition of laser scanned deformable objects. Geodetic Deformation Monitoring: From Geophysical to Engineering Roles, pp.103–11.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, P. J. 1964. Robust estimation of a location parameter. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 35(1), pp.73–101. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177703732
   Google Scholar
• Kahmen, H., 1997. Vermessungskunde. Berlin: de Gruyter Lehrbuch.
   Google Scholar
• Kersten, T., Mechelke, K., Lindstaedt, M. and Sternberg, H. 2009. Methods for geometric accuracy investigations of terrestrial laser scanning systems. Photogrammetrie-Fernerkundung-Geoinformation, 2009(4), pp.301–15. doi: 10.1127/1432-8364/2009/0023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, K.-R. 1999. Parameter estimation and hypothesis testing in linear models. Berlin/Heidelberg/NewYork: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kutterer, H. and Schön, S. 1999. Statistische Analyse quadratischer Formen -der Determinantenansatz. AVN 10, pp.322–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lichti, D. 2007. Error modelling, calibration and analysis of an AM–CW terrestrial laser scanner system. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 61(5), pp.307–24. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2006.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichti, D., Chow, J. and Lahamy, H. 2011. Parameter de-correlation and modelidentification in hybrid-style terrestrial laser scanner self-calibration. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66(3), pp.317–26. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichti, D. and Franke, J. 2005. Self-calibration of the iQsun 880 laser scanner. Proceedings of Optical 3D Measurement Techniques, 1, pp.112–21.
   Google Scholar
• Lichti, D. and Gordon, S. 2004. Error propagation in directly georeferenced terrestrial laser scanner point clouds for cultural heritage recording. In: Proceedings of FIG Working Week, Athens, Greece, May, pp.22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Lichti, D. D., Gordon, S. J. and Tipdecho, T., 2005. Error models and propagation in directly georeferenced terrestrial laser scanner networks. Journal of Surveying Engineering, 131(4), pp.135–42. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(2005)131:4(135)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manuel, E. 2002. 2002. Structural deformation surveying. Em-1110-2-1009, US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Mechelke, K., Kersten, T. and Lindstaedt, M. 2007. Comparative investigations into the accuracy behaviour of the new generation of terrestrial laser scanning systems. In: The 8th Conference on Optical 3D Measurement Techniques. Zurich, Switzerland. pp.319–27.
   Google Scholar
• Mikhail, E. M. and Ackermann, F. E. 1976. Observations and least squares. New York: IEP.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, A. 1972. Some pitfalls to be avoided in the iterative adjustment of nonlinear problems. In: Proceedings of 38th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, USA, American Society of Photogrammetry, pp.449–73.
   Google Scholar
• Reshetyuk, Y. 2009. Self-calibration and direct georeferencing in terrestrial laser scanning. PhD. Arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad, Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan.
   Google Scholar
• Reshetyuk, Y. 2010. A unified approach to self-calibration of terrestrial laser scanners. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 65(5), pp.445–56. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, T. 2008. Calibration of a terrestrial laser scanner for engineering geodesy. PhD. Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule ETH Zürich, Nr. 17036.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöberg, L. 1983. Unbiased estimation of variance-covariance components in condition adjustment with unknowns – a MINQUE approach. Zeitschrift für Vermessungswesen, 108(9), pp.382–87.
   Google Scholar
• Soudarissanane, S., Lindenbergh, R., Menenti, M. and Teunissen, P. 2011. Scanning geometry: influencing factor on the quality of terrestrial laser scanning points. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66(4), pp.389–99. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J. 2013a. Block-to-point fine registration in terrestrial laser scanning. Remote Sensing, 5(12), pp.6921–37. doi: 10.3390/rs5126921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J. 2013b. Towards deformation monitoring with terrestrial laser scanning based on external calibration and feature matching methods. PhD. Nr. 308. Fachrichtung Geodäsie und Geoinformatik, Leibniz Universität Hannover.
   Google Scholar
• Weichel, H. 1990. Laser beam propagation in the atmosphere. Washington: Bellingham.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, P. and Ghilani, C. 1997. Adjustment computations: statistics and least squares in surveying and GIS. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wunderlich, T. et al. 2013. Objective specifications of terrestrial laserscanners – a contribution of the gedetic laboratory at the Technishche Universitatet München. Tech.rep., Blue Series Books at the Chair of Geodesy.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Song, L. and Xu, T. 2002. Robust estimator for correlated observations based on bifactor equivalent weights. Journal of Geodesy, 76(6), pp.353–58. doi: 10.1007/s00190-002-0256-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, Z. 1992. A generalization theory of estimation of variance-covariance components. Manuscripta Geodaetica, 17, p.295.
   Google Scholar
• Zogg, M. H. 2008. Investigations of high precision terrestrial laser scanning with emphasis on the development of a robust close-range 3D-laser scanning system. PhD. Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule ETH Zürich, Nr. 18013.
   Google Scholar