Blockchain-oriented geospatial architecture model for real-time land registration

References

• Adams, B., and Tomko, M., 2018. A critical look at cryptogovernance of the real world: challenges for spatial representation and uncertainty on the blockchain. 10th international conference on geographic information science (GIScience 2018), Melbourne, Australia. doi: 10.4230/LIPIcs.GIScience.2018.19.
   Google Scholar
• Aloufi, A., et al., 2021. Universal location referencing and homomorphic evaluation of geospatial query. Computers & security, 102, 102137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ameyaw, P.D., and De Vries, W.T., 2020. Transparency of land administration and the role of blockchain technology, a four-dimensional framework analysis from the Ghanaian land perspective. Land, 9, 491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ameyaw, P.D., and De Vries, W.T., 2021. Toward smart land management: land acquisition and the associated challenges in Ghana. A look into a blockchain digital land registry for prospects. Land, 10, 239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, R., et al., 2021. Hybrid approaches for smart contracts in land administration: lessons from three blockchain proofs-of-concept. Land, 10 (2), 220. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, R.M., Pickering, M., and Sargent, J., 2019. Transformations, transitions, or tall tales? A global review of the uptake and impact of NoSQL, blockchain, and big data analytics on the land administration sector. Land use policy, 83, 435–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulos, K., et al., 2018. Geospatial blockchain: promises, challenges, and scenarios in health and healthcare. International journal of health geographics, 17, 25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouraga, S., 2021. A taxonomy of blockchain consensus protocols: a survey and classification framework. Expert systems with applications, 168, 114384.
   Google Scholar
• Cete, M., and Yomralioglu, T., 2013. Re-engineering of Turkish land administration. Survey review, 45, 197–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, D., and Ifejika Speranza, C., 2020. The role of blockchain in documenting land users’ rights: the canonical case of farmers in the vernacular land market. Frontiers in blockchain, 3 (19).
   Google Scholar
• Döner, F., 2015. Evaluation of cadastre renovation studies in Turkey. Survey review, 47, 141–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith-Charles, C., and Opadeyi, J., 2009. Anticipating the impacts of land registration programmes. Survey review, 41, 364–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO. 2020a. Blockchain and distributed ledger technologies — Overview of and interactions between smart contracts in blockchain and distributed ledger technology systems, ISO/TR 23455, Technical Report, First Edition. International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2020b. Blockchain and distributed ledger technologies — Privacy and personally identifiable information protection considerations, ISO/TR 23244, Technical Report. International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2020c. Blockchain and distributed ledger technologies — Reference architecture, Draft International Standard, ISO/DIS 23257. International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2020d. Blockchain and distributed ledger technologies — Security management of digital asset custodians, ISO/TR 23576, Technical Report, First Edition. International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2020e. Blockchain and distributed ledger technologies — Vocabulary, ISO 22739. International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Kalogianni, E., et al., 2020. 3D land administration: a review and a future vision in the context of the spatial development lifecycle. ISPRS international journal of geo-information, 9, 107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kara, A., et al., 2020. 3 dimensional data research for property valuation in the context of the LADM valuation information model. Land use policy, 98, 104179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krigsholm, P., Ridanpää, K., and Riekkinen, K. 2019. Blockchain as a technological solution in land administration – What are current barriers to implementation? . FIG Working Week 2019, Geospatial information for a smarter life and environmental resilience Hanoi, Vietnam, April 22–26.
   Google Scholar
• Krigsholm, P., Riekkinen, K., and Ståhle, P., 2020. Pathways for a future cadastral system: a socio-technical approach. Land use policy, 94, 104504.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnapriya, S., and Sarath, G., 2020. Securing land registration using blockchain. Procedia computer science, 171, 1708–1715.
   Google Scholar
• Latif, S., et al., 2021. A blockchain-based architecture for secure and trustworthy operations in the industrial internet of things. Journal of industrial information integration, 21, 100190.
   Google Scholar
• Lemmen, C., et al., 2018. Exploring options for standardization of processes and transactions in land administration. 7th international FIG workshop on the land administration domain model, April 12–13, Zagreb, Croatia.
   Google Scholar
• Lemmen, C., et al., 2019. The scope of LADM revision is shaping-up. 8th international FIG workshop on the land administration domain model, October 1–3, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Lemmen, C., Vos, J., and Beentjes, B., 2017. Ongoing development of land administration standards: blockchain in transaction management. European property law journal, 6, 478–502.
   Google Scholar
• Li, X., Zheng, Z., and Dai, H.-N., 2021. When services computing meets blockchain: challenges and opportunities. Journal of parallel and distributed computing, 150, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., et al., 2020. Blockchain-based identity management systems: a review. Journal of network and computer applications, 166, 102731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Q., et al., 2019. Ubaas: a unified blockchain as a service platform. Future generation computer systems, 101, 564–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manupati, V.K., et al., 2020. A blockchain-based approach for a multi-echelon sustainable supply chain. International journal of production research, 58, 2222–2241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyachi, K., and Mackey, T.K., 2021. hOCBS: a privacy-preserving blockchain framework for healthcare data leveraging an on-chain and off-chain system design. Information processing & management, 58, 102535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandi, M., et al. A secured land registration framework on blockchain. 2020 third ISEA conference on security and privacy (ISEA-ISAP), February 27–March 1, pp. 130–138.
   Google Scholar
• Nasrulin, B., Muzammal, M., and Qu, Q., 2018. A robust spatio-temporal verification protocol for blockchain. In: H. Hacid, W. Cellary, H. Wang, HY. Paik, and R. Zhou, eds. Web information systems engineering – WISE 2018. WISE 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer, vol. 11233, 52–67. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-02922-7_4.
   Google Scholar
• Nurgaliev, I., Muzammal, M., and Qu, Q., 2018. Enabling blockchain for efficient spatio-temporal query processing. In: H. Hacid, W. Cellary, H. Wang, HY. Paik, and R. Zhou, eds. Web information systems engineering – WISE 2018. WISE 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer, vol. 11233, 36–51. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-02922-7_3.
   Google Scholar
• Oosterom, P.V., et al., 2019. Joint ISO/TC211 and OGC revision of the LADM: valuation information, spatial planning information, SDG land indicators, refined survey model, links to BIM, support of LA processes, technical encodings, and much more on their Way!. In proceedings FIG working week 2019: geospatial information for a smarter life and environmental resilience international federation of surveyors (FIG).
   Google Scholar
• Perera, S., et al., 2020. Blockchain technology: Is it hype or real in the construction industry? Journal of industrial information integration, 17, 100125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polat, Z.A., et al., 2020. A LADM-based temporal cadastral information system for modelling of easement rights – A case study of Turkey. Survey review, 52, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przytarski, D., et al., 2022. Query processing in blockchain systems: current state and future challenges. Future internet, 14 (1).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putz, B., et al., 2021. Ethertwin: blockchain-based secure digital twin information management. Information processing & management, 58, 102425.
   Google Scholar
• Qu, Q., et al., 2019. On spatio-temporal blockchain query processing. Future generation computer systems, 98, 208–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel, A., and Fati, T., 2020. Application of blockchain technology in land administration in Ghana. In: W. Idongesit, ed. Cross-industry use of blockchain technology and opportunities for the future. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 103–116.
   Google Scholar
• Sladić, G., et al., 2021. A blockchain solution for securing real property transactions: a case study for Serbia. ISPRS international journal of geo-information, 10 (1).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, H., et al., 2021. Proof-of-contribution consensus mechanism for blockchain and its application in intellectual property protection. Information processing & management, 58, 102507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakur, V., et al., 2020. Land records on blockchain for implementation of land titling in India. International journal of information management, 52, 101940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thamrin, R.M.H., et al., 2021. Blockchain-based land certificate management in Indonesia. ADI journal on recent innovation, 2, 232–252.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, R.J., 2015. A model for the creation and progressive improvement of a digital cadastral data base. Land use policy, 49, 565–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unger, E.-M., et al., 2020. Global policy transfer for land administration and disaster risk management. Land use policy, 99, 104834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oosterom, P., et al., 2020. 3D land administration for 3D land uses. Land use policy, 98, 104665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent, N.E., Skjellum, A., and Medury, S., 2020. Blockchain architecture: a design that helps CPA firms leverage the technology. International journal of accounting information systems, 38, 100466.
   Google Scholar
• Vos, J., Lemmen, C., and Beentjes, B. 2017. Blockchain-based land administration: feasible, illusory or panacae? Responsible land governance: towards and evidence based approach, 2017. World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty the World Bank - Washington DC, March 20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., et al., 2020. Blockchain-based framework for improving supply chain traceability and information sharing in precast construction. Automation in construction, 111, 103063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang, Y., et al., 2021. A multi-type and decentralized data transaction scheme based on smart contracts and digital watermarks. Journal of network and computer applications, 176, 102953.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, Y., et al., 2020. A novel temporal and spatial panorama stream processing engine on IoT applications. Journal of industrial information integration, 18, 100143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahed Benisi, N., Aminian, M., and Javadi, B., 2020. Blockchain-based decentralized storage networks: a survey. Journal of network and computer applications, 162, 102656.
   Google Scholar