Δια as a Polysemous Preposition in Early Byzantine Greek: “Dead Ends” and Other Uses in the Qurrah Archive (VIII AD)

References

• Abbott, N. 1938. The Kurrah Papyri from Aphrodito in the Oriental Institute. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, H. I. 1910. Greek Papyri in the British Museum. London: Trustees of the British Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, H. I. 1926. “Two Official Letters of the Arab Period.” The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 12: 265–281. doi: 10.2307/3854396
   Google Scholar
• Benedetti, M. 1986. “Un caso di interferenza tra preposizioni nel greco ellenistico.” Studi Classici e Orientali 35: 93–98.
   Google Scholar
• Bortone, P. 2010. Greek Prepositions from Antiquity to the Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cadell, H. 1983. “Nouveaux fragments de la correspondance de Kurrah ben Sharik.” Recherches de Papyrologie 4: 107–160.
   Google Scholar
• Crespo, E. 1988. “La expresión de la función manera en griego.” Emerita 56: 43–64. doi: 10.3989/emerita.1988.v56.i1.604
   Google Scholar
• George, C. H. 2005. Expressions of Agency in Ancient Greek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• González González, M. M. 1996. Sintaxis casual y preposicional de la correspondencia real del período helenistico. Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo.
   Google Scholar
• Halla-aho, H. 2010. “Linguistic Varieties and Language Level in Latin Non-literary Letters.” In The Language of the Papyri, edited by T. V. Evans and D. D. Obbink, 171–183. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haspelmath, M. 2004. “On Directionality in Language Change with Particular Reference to Grammaticalization.” In Up and Down the Cline: The Nature of Grammaticalization, edited by O. Fischer, M. Norde, and H. Perridon, 17–44. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Holton, D., P. Mackridge, and I. Philippaki-Warburton. 2004. Greek: A Comprehensive Grammar of the Modern Language. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jannaris, A. 1897. An Historical Greek Grammar Chiefly of the Attic Dialect. Hildesheim: Olms.
   Google Scholar
• Jernstedt, P. [1927] 1966. Die Kome-Aphrodito Papyri der Sammlung Lichačov. Amsterdam: Hakkert.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lestrade, S., and P. J. F. de Swart. 2010. “Individuation and Semantic Role Interpretation in the Adpositional Domain.” In Transitivity. Form, Meaning, Acquisition, and Processing, edited by M. Garcia and P. Brandt, 279–300. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Liddell, H. G., and R. Scott. 1996. A Greek-English Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Liebeschuetz, W. 1974. “The Pagarch: City and Imperial Administration in Byzantine Egypt.” The Journal of Juristic Papyrology 18: 163–168.
   Google Scholar
• Ljungvik, H. 1932. Beiträge zur Syntax der pätgriechischen Volkssprache. Uppsala: Almqvist och Wiksell.
   Google Scholar
• Luraghi, S. 1989. “Cause and Instrument Expressions in Classical Greek.” Mnemosyne 43: 294–308.
   Google Scholar
• Luraghi, S. 2000. “Spatial Metaphors and Agenthood in Ancient Greek.” In 125 Jahre Indogermanistik in Graz, edited by Ch. Zinko and M. Offisch, 283–298. Graz: Leykam.
   Google Scholar
• Luraghi, S. 2003. On the Meaning of Prepositions and Cases. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Luraghi, S. 2012. “The Spatial Meaning of διά with the Accusative in Homeric Greek.” Mnemosyne 65: 357–386. doi: 10.1163/156852511X547965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luraghi, S. 2014. “Agency and Causation.” In Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics, edited by G. Giannakis, V. Bubenik, E. Crespo, C. Golston, A. Lianeri, S. Luraghi, and S. Matthaios, 65–72. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Mayser, E. 1934. Grammatik der griechischen Papyri aus der Ptolemäerzeit, Band II.2: Satzlehre. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Papaconstantinou, A. 2015a. “Fustat and its Governor.” In A Cosmopolitan City. Muslims, Christians and Jews in Old Cairo, edited by T. Vorderstrasse and T. Treptow, 43–47. Chicago, IL: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Papaconstantinou, A. 2015b. “The Rhetoric of Power and the Voice of Reason: Tensions Between Central and Local in the Correspondence of Qurra ibn Sharīk.” In Official Epistolography and the Language(s) of Power, edited by S. Procházka, L. Reinfandt, and S. Tost, 267–281. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Preisigke, F. [1925] 1927. Wörterbuch der griechischen Papyrusurkunden mit Einschluss der griechischen Inschriften, Aufschriften, Ostraka, Mumienschilder usw. aus Ägypten. 2 vols. Berlin: Selbstverlag der Erben.
   Google Scholar
• Richter, T. S. 2010. “Language Choice in the Qurra Dossier.” In The Multilingual Experience in Egypt from the Ptolemies to the ‘Abbāsids, edited by A. Papaconstantinou, 189–220. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Vandorpe, K. 2009. “Archives and Dossiers.” In Oxford Handbook of Papyrology, edited by R. Bagnall, 216–255. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vassilaki, S. 1992. “I Prothesis GIA.” Studies in Greek Linguistics 12: 183–194.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, L. 1906. Die Stellvertretung im Rechte der Papyri. Leipzig: Teubner.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, K. 1912. Studien zur Sprache des Malalas. II. Syntax. München: Progr.
   Google Scholar