Otho’s duo facinora (Tacitus, Hist. 2.50.1): Conflict, Congruence, Exemplarity

References

• Arand, T. 2002. Das schmähliche Ende: Der Tod des schlechten Kaisers und seine literarische Gestaltung in der römischen Historiographie. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Ash, R. 1999. Ordering Anarchy: Armies and Leaders in Tacitus’ Histories. London: Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Ash, R., ed. 2007. Tacitus: Histories Book II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aubrion, E. 1985. Rhétorique et histoire chez Tacite. Metz: Université de Metz.
   Google Scholar
• Balmaceda, C. 2017. Virtus Romana: Politics and Morality in the Roman Historians. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Batstone, W. W. 2010. “Word at War: The Prequel.” In Citizens of Discord: Rome and Its Civil Wars, edited by B. W. Breed, C. Damon, and A. Rossi, 45–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bittarello, M. B. 2011. “Otho, Elagabalus and the Judgement of Paris: The Literary Construction of the Unmanly Emperor.” Dialogues d’Histoire Ancienne 37: 93–113.
   Google Scholar
• Charles, M. B., and E. Anagnostou-Laoutides. 2013. “Unmanning an Emperor: Otho in the Literary Tradition.” Classical Journal 109: 199–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilver, G. E. F. 1979. A Historical Commentary on Tacitus’ Histories I and II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daitz, S. G. 1960. “Tacitus’ Technique of Character Portrayal.” American Journal of Philology 81: 30–52.
   Google Scholar
• Damon, C., ed. 2003. Tacitus: Histories Book I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duchêne, P. 2020. Comment écrire sur les empereurs? Les procédés historiographiques de Tacite et Suétone. Bordeaux: Ausonius Éditions.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, C. 2007. Death in Ancient Rome. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fludernik, M. 2009. An Introduction to Narratology. New York, NY and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fögen, T. 2015. “Ars moriendi: Literarische Portraits von Selbsttötung bei Plinius dem Jüngeren und Tacitus.” Antike und Abendland 61: 21–56.
   Google Scholar
• Galtier, F. 2011. L’image tragique de l’histoire chez Tacite. Brussels: Éditions Latomus.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Grisé, Y. 1982. Le suicide dans la Rome antique. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, B. F. 1962. “Tacitus on the Death of Otho.” Classical Journal 58: 73–77.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, H. 2003. The History of Make-Believe: Tacitus on Imperial Rome. Berkeley, CA and London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heraeus, K., ed. 1929. Cornelii Taciti Historiarum Libri qui supersunt. Erster Band, Buch I und II⁶, revised by W. Heraeus. Leipzig and Berlin: Teubner (repr. 1966, Amsterdam: Hakkert).
   Google Scholar
• Heubner, H. 1963. P. Cornelius Tacitus, Die Historien. Band I, Erstes Buch. Heidelberg: Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Heubner, H. 1968. P. Cornelius Tacitus, Die Historien. Band II, Zweites Buch. Heidelberg: Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, G. O. 1993. Latin Literature from Seneca to Juvenal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keitel, E. 1987. “Otho’s Exhortations in Tacitus Histories.” Greece and Rome 34: 73–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keitel, E. 1991. “The Structure and Function of Speeches in Tacitus’ Histories I–III.” In Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt II 33.4, edited by H. Temporini and W. Haase, 2772–2794. Berlin and New York, NY: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Keitel, E. 2006. “Sententia and Structure in Tacitus Histories 1.12-49.” Arethusa 39: 219–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ker, J. 2009. The Deaths of Seneca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchner, R. 2001. Sentenzen im Werk des Tacitus. Stuttgart: Steiner.
   Google Scholar
• Klingner, F. 1986 [1940]. “Die Geschichte Kaiser Othos bei Tacitus.” In Tacitus², edited by V. Pöschl, 403–427. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Kneppe, A. 1994. Metus temporum: Zur Bedeutung von Angst in Politik und Gesellschaft der römischen Kaiserzeit des 1. und 2. Jhdts n. Chr. Stuttgart: Steiner.
   Google Scholar
• Krohn, F. 1934. Personendarstellungen bei Tacitus. PhD diss., Leipzig.
   Google Scholar
• Labate, M. 1977–1978. “Le ambiguità di Otone.” Maia 29–30: 27–60.
   Google Scholar
• Lindl, A. 2020. Narrative Technik und Leseraktivierung: Tacitus’ Annalen XIII–XVI. Stuttgart: Steiner.
   Google Scholar
• Lowrie, M. “Making an Exemplum of Yourself: Cicero and Augustus.” In Classical Constructions: Papers in Memory of Don Fowler, Classicist and Epicurean, edited by S. J. Heyworth, P. G. Fowler, and S. J. Harrison, 91–112. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maltz, M. 1960. Psycho-Cybernetics. New York, NY: Pocket Books.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, M. G. 2006. 69 A.D.: The Year of the Four Emperors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neumeister, C. 1986. “Die psychologische Geschichtsschreibung des Tacitus.” In Tacitus², edited by V. Pöschl, 194–216. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Neumeister, C. 2000. “Otho: Demagoge – Staatsmann – stoischer Held. Seine drei Reden in den Historien des Tacitus.” In Rede und Redner. Bewertung und Darstellung in den antiken Kulturen, edited by C. Neumeister and W. Raeck, 191–203. Möhnesee: Bibliopolis.
   Google Scholar
• Orwell, G. 1951. Down and Out in Paris and London. London: Secker and Warburg.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, C. A. 1993. “Tacitus on Otho.” Latomus 52: 848–855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plass, P. 1995. The Game of Death in Ancient Rome: Arena Sport and Political Suicide. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pöschl, V. 1959. “Das Bild der politischen Welt bei Tacitus.” In Tacitus, Historien, trans. W. Sontheimer, vii–xxxix. Stuttgart: Kröner.
   Google Scholar
• Pöschl, V. 1972. “Tacitus als Politologe.” In Zeitkritik bei Tacitus, edited by V. Pöschl and A. Klinz, 5–32. Heidleberg: Kerle.
   Google Scholar
• Pöschl, V., ed. 1986. Tacitus². Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Ramage, E. S. 1987. The Nature and Purpose of Augustus’ “Res Gestae.” Stuttgart: Steiner.
   Google Scholar
• Ries, W. 1969. Gerücht, Gerede, öffentliche Meinung: Interpretationen zur Psychologie und Darstellungskunst des Tacitus. PhD diss., Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Römer, F. 1999. “Kontrastfiguren in den Annalen des Tacitus.” Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 39: 297–312.
   Google Scholar
• Sailor, D. 2008. Writing and Empire in Tacitus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz, T. A. 2007. Modern Literary Theory and Ancient Texts. Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Schönlein, P. W. 1965. Sittliches Bewußtsein als Handlungsmotiv bei römischen Historikern. PhD diss., Erlangen-Nürnberg.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, P. 1964. “Studien zur Darstellung des Endes von Galba, Otho und Vitellius in den Historien des Tacitus.” Symbolae Osloenses 39: 38–82.
   Google Scholar
• Spielberg, L. 2017. “Language, Stasis and the Role of the Historian in Thucydides, Sallust and Tacitus.” American Journal of Philology 138: 331–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suerbaum, W. 2015. Skepsis und Suggestion. Heidelberg: Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Syme, R. 1958. Tacitus. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Utard, R. 2004. Le discours indirect chez les historiens latins: écriture ou oralité? Étude stylistique. Louvain and Paris: Peeters.
   Google Scholar
• Vielberg, M. 2000. “Tacitus als Psychologe.” Antike und Abendland 46: 173–189.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, B. C. 2010. Rhetorical Pathos and the Critique of Leadership in Tacitus’ Histories. PhD diss., Indiana.
   Google Scholar
• Woodman, A. J., ed. 1983. Velleius Paterculus: The Caesarian and Augustan Narrative (2.41–93). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar