Που in Attic Drama: Evidential Marker and Common Ground Manager

References

• Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allan, Rutger J. 2017. “The Grammaticalization of Greek Particles.” In Ancient Greek Linguistics: New Approaches, Insights, Perspectives, edited by Felicia Logozzo and Paolo Poccetti, 103–118. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Allan, Rutger J. 2020. “Focus of Attention and Common Ground: The Function of the Particle δή in Thucydides.” In Proceedings of the Ninth International Colloquium on Ancient Greek Linguistics (ICAGL 9), edited by Martti Leiwo, Marja Vierros, and Sonja Dahlgren, 207–234. Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica / The Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters.
   Google Scholar
• Bolling, George Melville. 1929. “The Meaning of Που in Homer.” Language 5 (2): 100–105.
   Google Scholar
• Boogaart, Ronny, and Alex Reuneker. 2017. “Intersubjectivity and Grammar.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Barbara Dancygier, 188–206. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caspers, Christiaan L. 2010. “The Pragmatic Function and Textual Status of Euripidean οὔ που and ἦ που.” The Classical Quarterly 60 (2): 327–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, Herbert H., ed. 1996. “Common Ground.” In Using Language, 92–122. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Herbert H., and Edward F. Schaefer. 1989. “Contributing to Discourse.” Cognitive Science 13 (2): 259–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, Guy L. 1998. Attic Greek Prose Syntax. Vol. 2. 4 vols. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. [English adaptation of Karl Wilhelm Krüger’s nineteenth-century Greek school grammar, written in German.]
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, Guy L. 2002. Greek Syntax: Early Greek Poetic and Herodotean Syntax. Vol. 4. 4 vols. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denniston, J. D. 1966. The Greek Particles. Second Edition. Oxford: Gerald Duckworth.
   Google Scholar
• Devares, Matthaios. 1588. Liber de Græcæ linguæ particulis. Romæ: Apud Franciscum Zannettum.
   Google Scholar
• Diggle, J., ed. 1981. Euripidis Fabulae. Tomus II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dik, Helma. 2007. Word Order in Greek Tragic Dialogue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emde Boas, Evert van, Albert Rijksbaron, Luuk Huitink, and Mathieu de Bakker. 2019. The Cambridge Grammar of Classical Greek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, Bruce. 1999. “What are Discourse Markers?” Journal of Pragmatics 31 (7): 931–952.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, Bruce. 2010. “Pragmatic Competence: The Case of Hedging.” In New Approaches to Hedging, edited by Gunther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch, and Stefan Schneider, 15–34. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, Robert L. 2003. “Making the Stronger Argument the Weaker: Euripides, ‘Electra’ 518–44.” The Classical Quarterly 53 (2): 401–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzech, Karolina. 2020. “Epistemic Primacy, Common Ground Management and the Epistemic Perspective Domain.” In Evidentiality, Egophoricity and Engagement, edited by Henrik Bergqvist and Seppo Kittilä, 23–60. Berlin: Language Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, Jeffrey, ed. 2000. Aristophanes. Birds. Lysistrata. Women at the Thesmophoria. Loeb Classical Library 179. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, Jeffrey, ed. 2002a. Aristophanes. Frogs. Assemblywomen. Wealth. Loeb Classical Library 180. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, Jeffrey, ed. 2002b [1987]. Aristophanes. Lysistrata. Edited with an Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, Thomas, and Audrey Perdew. 2016. “Politeness and the Communication of Uncertainty.” Cognition 154: 1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopper, Paul J., and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization. Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janse, Mark. 2021. “The Tragic Irony of a Particle: Agamemnon’s νόστος and the Use of που in the διάπϵιρα Episode (Il., 2.136).” Les Études Classiques 89 (1–4): 133–141.
   Google Scholar
• Kannicht, Richard, ed. 1969. Euripides. Helena. Herausgegeben und erklärt. 2 vols. Heidelberg: Carl Winter, Universitätsverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Keersmaekers, Alek. 2020. “A Computational Approach to the Greek Papyri: Developing a Corpus to Study Variation and Change in the Post-Classical Greek Complementation System.” PhD diss., KU Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• Knox, Bernard M. W. 1972. “Aeschylus and the Third Actor.” The American Journal of Philology 93 (1): 104–124.
   Google Scholar
• Koier, Elizabeth. 2013. Interpreting Particles in Dead and Living Languages: A Construction Grammar Approach to the Semantics of Dutch ergens and Ancient Greek που. Utrecht: LOT.
   Google Scholar
• Kovacs, David, ed. 1999. Euripides. Trojan Women. Iphigenia among the Taurians. Ion. Loeb Classical Library 10. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kovacs, David, ed. 2018. Euripides. Troades. Edited with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Labéy, Daniel. 1950. Manuel des particules grecques. Paris: Klincksieck.
   Google Scholar
• Larrivée, Pierre, and Amel Kallel. 2020. “The Empirical Reality of Bridging Contexts: Strong Polarity Contexts as the Transition between NPIs and n-Words.” Journal of Historical Linguistics 10 (3): 427–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liddell, Henry George, Robert Scott, Henry Stuart Jones, and Roderick McKenzie. 1996. A Greek-English Lexicon. Rev. and augm. throughout. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd-Jones, Hugh, ed. 1994. Sophocles. Antigone. The Women of Trachis. Philoctetes. Oedipus at Colonus. The Loeb Classical Library 21. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loudová, Kateřina Bočková. 2014. “Particles (Formal Features).” In Encyclopedia of Ancient Greek Language and Linguistics, edited by Georgios K. Giannakis, 24–31. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, Maurice. 1974. “Merciful Heavens? A Question in Aeschylus’ Agamemnon.” The Journal of Hellenic Studies 94: 100–113.
   Google Scholar
• Sicking, C. M. J., and J. M. van Ophuijsen. 1993. Two Studies in Attic Particle Usage: Lysias and Plato. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Tomaka, Kamila. 2020. “The Status and Functions of the Ancient Greek particle δή in the Dialogues of Plato, with an Analysis of its Translation into Dutch and Polish.” Unpublished PhD diss., Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II and KU Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rooy, Raf. 2016. “The Relevance of Evidentiality for Ancient Greek: Some Explorative Steps through Plato.” Journal of Greek Linguistics 16 (1): 3–46.
   Google Scholar
• Wackernagel, Jakob. 1895. “Miszellen zur griechischen Grammatik.” Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung auf dem Gebiete der Indogermanischen Sprachen 1 (33): 1–62. [Reprinted in Wackernagel, Jakob. 1969 [1955]. Kleine Schriften 1, 564–741. Göttingen: Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen.]
   Google Scholar
• West, Martin L. 1990. Studies in Aeschylus. Stuttgart: B. G. Teubner.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, N. G., ed. 2008. Aristophanis Fabulae. Tomus II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zakowski, Samuel. 2014. “Inference and Metarepresentation: Ancient Greek ἦ που as a Constraint on Higher-Level Explicatures.” Journal of Pragmatics 74: 109–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, Bernhard. 2006. “Aeschylus [1] of Athens Tragedian, 5th Cent. BC.” In Brill’s New Pauly, edited by Hubert Cancik, Helmuth Schneider, and Christine F. Salazar. Online edition. Leiden and Boston: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/1574-9347_bnp_e110710. Accessed June 22, 2022.
   Google Scholar