Robust Parameter Design With Computer Experiments Using Orthonormal Polynomials

REFERENCES

• Ankenman, B., Nelson, B.L., and Staum, J. (2010), “Stochastic Kriging for Simulation Metamodeling,” Operations Research, 58, 371–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apley, D.W., Liu, J., and Chen, W. (2006), “Understanding the Effects of Model Uncertainty in Robust Design With Computer Experiments,” Journal of Mechanical Design, 128, 945–958.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W., Jin, R., and Sudjianto, A. (2006), “Analytical Global Sensitivity Analysis and Uncertainty Propagation for Robust Design,” Journal of Quality Technology, 38, 333–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crestaux, T., Maître, O.L., and Martinez, J.M. (2009), “Polynomial Chaos Expansion for Sensitivity Analysis,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 94, 1161–1172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currin, C., Mitchell, T., Morris, M., and Ylvisaker, D. (1991), “Bayesian Prediction of Deterministic Functions, With Applications to the Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86, 953–963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deb, K. (1997), “GeneAS: A Robust Optimal Design Technique for Mechanical Component Design,” in Evolutionary Algorithms in Engineering Applications, eds. D. Dasgupta and Z. Michalewicz, New York: Springer, pp. 497–514.
   Google Scholar
• Efron, B., and Stein, C. (1981), “The Jackknife Estimate of Variance,” The Annals of Statistics, 9, 586–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautschi, W. (2004), Orthogonal Polynomials: Computation and Approximation, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• George, E.I., and McCulloch, R.E. (1993), “Variable Selection via Gibbs Sampling,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 881–889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanem, R., and Spanos, P.D. (1991), Stochastic Finite Elements: A Spectral Approach, New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Lehman, J.S., Santner, T.J., and Notz, W.I. (2004), “Designing Computer Experiments to Determine Robust Control Variables,” Statistica Sinica, 14, 571–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Maître, O.P., and Knio, O.M. (2010), Spectral Methods for Uncertainty Quantification: With Applications to Computational Fluid Dynamics, New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, R.H., Montgomery, D.C., and Anderson-Cook, C.M. (2009), Response Surface Methodology (3rd ed.), New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Nemirovski, A., Juditsky, A., Lan, G., and Shapiro, A. (2009), “Robust Stochastic Approximation Approach to Stochastic Programming,” SIAM Journal on Optimization, 19, 1574–1609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niederreiter, H. (1992), Random Number Generation and Quasi-Monte Carlo Methods, Philadelphia, PA: SIAM.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, J.E., and O’Hagan, A. (2004), “Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis of Complex Models: A Bayesian Approach,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 66, 751–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, P.Z. (2009), “Nested Latin Hypercube Designs,” Biometrika, 96, 957–970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, M., and Simon, B. (1980), Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics I: Functional Analysis, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riera, M.P., and Malumbres, J.L. V. (1995), “On Completeness of Orthogonal Systems and Dirac Deltas,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 58, 225–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riesz, M. (1923), “Sur le Probleme des Moments et le Theoreme de Parseval Correspondant,” Acta Litt. Ac. Sci. Szeged, 1, 209–225.
   Google Scholar
• Sacks, J., Welch, W.J., Mitchell, T.J., and Wynn, H.P. (1989), “Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments,” Statistical Science, 4, 409–423.
   Google Scholar
• Saltelli, A., Chan, K., and Scott, M. (eds.). (2000), Sensitivity Analysis, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Santner, T.J., Williams, B.J., and Notz, W.I. (2003), The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments, New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Sobol, I.M. (2001), “Global Sensitivity Indices for Nonlinear Mathematical Models and Their Monte Carlo Estimates,” Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 55, 271–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, D.M., and Bursztyn, D. (2004), “Data Analytic Tools for Understanding Random Field Regression Models,” Technometrics, 46, 411–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudret, B. (2008), “Global Sensitivity Analysis Using Polynomial Chaos Expansions,” Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 93, 964–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, M.H. Y., and Wu, C.F. J. (2012), “Robust Design Optimization with Quadratic Loss Derived From Gaussian Process Models,” Technometrics, 54, 51–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, W., Yu, T., Kang, S.M., and Sacks, J. (1990), “Computer Experiments for Quality Control by Parameter Design,” Journal of Quality Technology, 22, 15–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, B.J., Santner, T.J., and Notz, W.I. (2000), “Sequential Design of Computer Experiments to Minimize Integrated Response Functions,” Statistica Sinica, 10, 1133–1152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiu, D. (2010), Numerical Methods for Stochastic Computations: A Spectral Method Approach, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar