Maximum One-Factor-At-A-Time Designs for Screening in Computer Experiments

References

• Ba, S. (2015), SLHD: Maximin-Distance (Sliced) Latin Hypercube Designs, R package version 2.1-1.
   Google Scholar
• Ba, S., Myers, W. R., and Brenneman, W. A. (2015), “Optimal Sliced Latin Hypercube Designs,” Technometrics, 57, 479–487. DOI: 10.1080/00401706.2014.957867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., and Saltelli, A. (2007), “An Effective Screening Design for Sensitivity Analysis of Large Models,” Environmental Modelling & Software, 22, 1509–1518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W., Jin, R., and Sudjianto, A. (2005), “Analytical Variance-based Global Sensitivity Analysis in Simulation-based Design Under Uncertainty,” Journal of Mechanical Design, Transactions Of the ASME, 127, 875–886. DOI: 10.1115/1.1904642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Veiga, S., Gamboa, F., Iooss, B., and Prieur, C. (2021), Basics and Trends in Sensitivity Analysis: Theory and Practice in R, Philadelphia: SIAM.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, C. (1973), “One-at-a-Time Plans,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 68, 353–360. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1973.10482433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dueck, G., and Scheuer, T. (1990), “Threshold Accepting: A General Purpose Optimization Algorithm Appearing Superior to Simulated Annealing,” Journal of Computational Physics, 90, 161–175. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(90)90201-B.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, K.-T., and Wang, Y. (1993), Number-Theoretic Methods in Statistics (Vol. 51), Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, J. H. (1991), “Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines,” The Annals of Statistics, 19, 1–67. DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176347963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iooss, B., Veiga, S. D., Janon, A., Pujol, G., with contributions from Baptiste Broto, Boumhaout, K., Delage, T., Amri, R. E., Fruth, J., Gilquin, L., Guillaume, J., Idrissi, M. I., Le Gratiet, L., Lemaitre, P., Marrel, A., Meynaoui, A., Nelson, B. L., Monari, F., Oomen, R., Rakovec, O., Ramos, B., Roustant, O., Song, E., Staum, J., Sueur, R., Touati, T., and Weber, F. (2021), sensitivity: Global Sensitivity Analysis of Model Outputs, R package version 1.24.0.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, M. J. (1999), “Analysis of Variance Designs for Model Output,” Computer Physics Communications, 117, 35–43. DOI: 10.1016/S0010-4655(98)00154-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. E., Moore, L. M., and Ylvisaker, D. (1990), “Minimax and Maximin Distance Designs,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 26, 131–148. DOI: 10.1016/0378-3758(90)90122-B.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, B., and Nachtsheim, C. J. (2011), “A Class of Three-Level Designs for Definitive Screening in the Presence of Second-Order Effects,” Journal of Quality Technology, 43, 1–15. DOI: 10.1080/00224065.2011.11917841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, V. R. (2016), “Space-Filling Designs for Computer Experiments: A Review,” Quality Engineering, 28, 28–35. DOI: 10.1080/08982112.2015.1100447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, M. D., Beckman, R. J., and Conover, W. J. (1979), “Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code,” Technometrics, 21, 239–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, H., Dean, A. M., and Santner, T. J. (2012), “Two-Stage Sensitivity-based Group Screening in Computer Experiments,” Technometrics, 54, 376–387. DOI: 10.1080/00401706.2012.725994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, M. D. (1991), “Factorial Sampling Plans for Preliminary Computational Experiments,” Technometrics, 33, 161–174. DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1991.10484804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, M. D., and Mitchell, T. J. (1995), “Exploratory Designs for Computational Experiments,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 43, 381–402. DOI: 10.1016/0378-3758(94)00035-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakley, J. E., and O’Hagan, A. (2004), “Probabilistic Sensitivity Analysis of Complex Models: A Bayesian Approach,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 66, 751–769. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2004.05304.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pires, E. S., Machado, J. T., de Moura Oliveira, P., Cunha, J. B., and Mendes, L. (2010), “Particle Swarm Optimization with Fractional-Order Velocity,” Nonlinear Dynamics, 61, 295–301. DOI: 10.1007/s11071-009-9649-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roustant, O., Ginsbourger, D., and Deville, Y. (2012), “DiceKriging, DiceOptim: Two R Packages for the Analysis of Computer Experiments by Kriging-based Metamodeling and Optimization,” Journal of Statistical Software, 51, 1–55. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v051.i01.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T., Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Gatelli, D., Saisana, M., and Tarantola, S. (2008), Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer, Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Campolongo, F., and Ratto, M. (2004), Sensitivity Analysis in Practice: A Guide to Assessing Scientific Models (Vol. 1), Chichester: Wiley Online Library.
   Google Scholar
• Santner, T. J., Williams, B. J., Notz, W. I., and Williams, B. J. (2003), The Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments (Vol. 1), New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sobol’, I. M. (1990), “On Sensitivity Estimation for Nonlinear Mathematical Models,” Matematicheskoe Modelirovanie, 2, 112–118 (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Sobol’, I. M. (1993), “On Sensitivity Estimation for Nonlinear Mathematical Models,” Mathematical Modeling and Computational Experiments, 1, 407–414.
   Google Scholar
• Sobol’, I. M. (2001), “Global Sensitivity Indices for Nonlinear Mathematical Models and their Monte Carlo Estimates,” Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 55, 271–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., Xiao, Q., and Mandal, A. (2020), “Musings about Constructions of Efficient Latin Hypercube Designs with Flexible Run-Sizes,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.09154.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, D. C., and Lewis, S. M. (2017), “Design of Experiments for Screening,” in Handbook of Uncertainty Quantification, eds. R. Ghanem, D. Hidgon and H. Owhadi, pp. 1143–1185, Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Worley, B. A. (1987), “Deterministic Uncertainty Analysis,” Technical Report, Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (USA).
   Google Scholar
• Wu, C. F. J., and Hamada, M. S. (2021), Experiments: Planning, Analysis, and Optimization (3rd ed.), Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, Q., and Joseph, V. R. (2022), MOFAT: Maximum One-Factor-at-a-Time Designs, R package version 1.0. DOI: 10.1080/00401706.2022.2141897.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, Q., and Xu, H. (2018), “Construction of Maximin Distance Designs via Level Permutation and Expansion,” Statistica Sinica, 28, 1395–1414. DOI: 10.5705/ss.202016.0423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, N., and Apley, D. W. (2014), “Fractional Brownian Fields for Response Surface Metamodeling,” Journal of Quality Technology, 46, 285–301. DOI: 10.1080/00224065.2014.11917972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar