Special Education Eligibility Decision Making in Response to Intervention Models

References

• Appelbaum , M. 2009 . The one-stop guide to implementing RTI: Academic and behavioral interventions, K–12 Thousand Oaks, CA : Corwin Press .
   Google Scholar
• Bender , W. N. and Shores , C. 2007 . Response to intervention: A practical guide for every teacher Thousand Oaks, CA : Corwin Press .
   Google Scholar
• Bradley , R. , Danielson , L. and Doolittle , J. 2007 . Responsiveness to intervention: 1997 to 2007 . Teaching Exceptional Children , 35 ( 5 ) : 8 – 12 .
   Google Scholar
• Burns , M. K. and Gibbons , K. A. 2008 . Implementing response-to-intervention in elementary and secondary schools: Procedures to assure scientific-based practices New York : Taylor & Francis .
   Google Scholar
• Council for Exceptional Children. 2008 . CEC's position on response to intervention (RTI): Unique role of special education and special educators . Teaching Exceptional Children , 40 ( 3 ) : 74 – 75 .
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs , D. and Deshler , D. D. 2007 . What we need to know about responsiveness to intervention (and shouldn't be afraid to ask) . Learning Disabilities Research and Practice , 22 : 129 – 136 .
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs , D. and Fuchs , L. S. 2006 . Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? . Reading Research Quarterly , 41 : 95 – 99 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs , D. and Fuchs , L. S. 1998 . Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities . Learning Disabilities Research and Practice , 13 : 204 – 219 .
   Google Scholar
• Gresham , F. M. 2007 . “ Evolution of the response-to-intervention concept: Empirical foundations and recent developments. ” . In Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention Edited by: Jimerson , S. R. , Burns , M. K. and VanDerHeyden , A. M. 10 – 24 . New York : Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Haager , D. and Mahdavi , J. 2007 . “ Teacher roles in implementing intervention. ” . In Evidence-based reading practices for response to intervention Edited by: Haager , D. , Klingner , J. and Vaughn , S. 245 – 264 . Baltimore : Paul H. Brookes .
   Google Scholar
• Harry , B. and Klingner , J. K. 2007 . Discarding the deficit model . Educational Leadeship , 64 ( 5 ) : 16 – 21 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover , J. J. Response to intervention models: Curricular implications and interventions Columbus, OH : Pearson Allyn & Bacon . (in press)
   Google Scholar
• Hoover , J. J. 2009 . RTI assessment essentials for struggling learners Thousand Oaks, CA : Corwin .
   Google Scholar
• Howell , R. , Patton , S. and Deiotte , M. 2008 . Understanding response to intervention: A practical guide to systemic implementation Bloomington, IN : Solution Tree .
   Google Scholar
• IDEA. 2004 . Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 2004 Washington, DC
   Google Scholar
• Ikeda , M. J. and Gustafson , J. K. 2002 . Heartland AEA 11's problem solving process: Impact on issues related to special education , Research Report No. 2002-01 Johnston, IA : Heartland Area Education Agency 11 .
   Google Scholar
• Kavale , K. A. and Flanagan , D. P. 2007 . “ Ability–achievement discrepancy, response to disability identification: Toward a contemporary operational definition. ” . In Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention Edited by: Jimerson , S. R. , Burns , M. K. and VanDerHeyden , A. M. 130 – 147 . New York : Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Klingner , J. K. and Bianco , M. 2006 . “ What is special about special education for culturally and linguistically diverse students with disabilities? ” . In What is special about special education? Edited by: Cook , B. and Schirmer , B . 37 – 53 . Austin, TX : Pro-Ed .
   Google Scholar
• Kovaleski , J. F. 2007 . “ Potential pitfalls of response to intervention. ” . In Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention Edited by: Jimerson , S. R. , Burns , M. K. and VanDerHeyden , A. M. 80 – 89 . New York : Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Mahdavi , J. N. and Beebe-Frankenberger , M. E. 2009 . Pioneering RTI systems that work: Social validity, collaboration and context . Teaching Exceptional Children , 42 ( 2 ) : 64 – 72 .
   Google Scholar
• Marston , D. , Reschly , A. L. , Lau , M. Y. , Muyskens , P. and Canter , A. 2007 . “ Historical perspectives and current trends in problem solving: The Minnesota story. ” . In Evidence-based reading practices for response to intervention Edited by: Haager , D. , Klingner , J. and Vaughn , S. 265 – 285 . Baltimore : Paul H. Brookes .
   Google Scholar
• Mellard , D. F. and Johnson , E. 2008 . RTI: A practitioner's guide to implementing response to intervention Thousand Oaks, CA : Corwin Press .
   Google Scholar
• Tucker , J. A. and Sornson , R. O. 2007 . “ One student at a time; One teacher at a time: Reflections on the use of instructional support. ” . In Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention Edited by: Jimerson , S. R. , Burns , M. K. and VanDerHeyden , A. M. 269 – 278 . New York : Springer .
   Google Scholar
• VanDerHeyden , A. M. , Witt , J. C. and Gilbertson , D. 2007 . A multi-year evaluation of the effects of a response to intervention (RTI) model on identification of children for special education . Journal of School Psychology , 45 ( 2 ) : 225 – 256 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn , S. and Klingner , J. 2007 . “ Overview of the three-tiered model of reading intervention. ” . In Evidence-based reading practices for response to intervention Edited by: Haager , D. , Klingner , J. and Vaughn , S. 3 – 10 . Baltimore : Paul H. Brookes .
   Google Scholar