Science in Action: How Middle School Students Are Changing Their World Through STEM Service-Learning Projects

References

• Alabama Course of Study: Science (Bulletin 2005, No. 20). Montgomery, Alabama: Alabama Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Balfanz, R., Bridgeland, J. M., Bruce, M., & Fox, J. H. (2013). Building a grad nation: Progress and challenge in ending the high school dropout epidemic. Retrieved November 19, 2014 from http://civicenterprises.net/MediaLibrary/Docs/Building-A-Grad-Nation-2013-ES-FlNAL-web-Reduced.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, S. H. (2002). Support for K–12 SL practice: A brief review of the research. Educational Horizons, 80, 184–190.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, S. H. (2007). Unpacking what works in S-L: Promising research-based practices to improve student outcomes. In, J. C.Kielsmeier (Ed.), Growing to Greatness 2007 (pp. 18–28). St. Paul, MN: National Leadership Council.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, S. H., Root, S., & Jesse, D. (2005). The relationship between quality indicators of SL and student outcomes: Testing professional wisdom. In S.Root, J.Callahan, & S. H.Billig (Eds.), Advances in SL research: Vol. 5. Improving SL practice: Research on models to enhance impacts (pp. 97–215). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, A. N. (2012). Effects of one school on gifted and high ability students' Project quality, academic engagement, and investment in academic learning. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.
   Google Scholar
• DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Many, T. (2006). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work. Bloomington, IL: Solution Tree.
   Google Scholar
• Furco, A. (2002). Is SL really better than community service? A study of high school service. In A.Furco & S. H.Billig (Eds.), Advances in service-learning research, Vol.1. Service Learning: The essence of pedagogy (pp. 23–50). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, D., Xie, H., Nord, C. W., Jenkins, F., Chan, J. Y., & Kastberg, D. (2013). Performance of U.S. 15-year-old students in mathematics, science, and reading literacy in an international context: First look at PISA 2012 (NCES 2014-024). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). Out-of-Field teaching in middle and high school grades, indicator 28. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/cce/2003/pdf/28_2003_pdf.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). The nation's report card: Mathematics 2011 (NCES 2012-458). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Youth Leadership Council. (2010). High quality instruction that transforms: A Guide to NYLC National Youth Leadership Council. (2010). IPARD/C: Implementing quality academic service-learning. Retrieved from http://dpi.wi.gov/sl/pdf/high_quality_learning_web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J. L. (2008). Talents are unlimited: It's time to teach thinking skills again!Gifted Child Today, 3I(3), 34–44.
   Google Scholar
• President's Council of Advisors on Science & Technology Strategy to Improve K–12 STEM Education. (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Retrieved November 19, 2014 from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-to-excel-final_feb.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Raju, P. K., & Clayson, A. (2010). The future of STEM education: An analysis of two national reports. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 11(5–6), 25–28.
   Google Scholar
• Roehlkepartain, E. C. (2009). IPARD/C Model. National Service-Learning Clearinghouse. Minneapolis, MN: Search Institute. Retrieved November 19, 2014 from http://http://www.servicelearning.org/library/resource/8543.
   Google Scholar
• Schlichter, C. (1986). Talents Unlimited: An inservice education model for teaching thinking skills. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30(3), 119–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlichter, C. L., & Palmer, W. R. (2002). Talents Unlimited: Thinking skills instruction as enrichment for all students. Research in the Schools, 9, 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Stetser, M., & Stillwell, R. (2014). Public high school four-year on-time graduation rates and event dropout rates: School years 2010–11 and 2011–12. First look (NCES 2014-391). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. W. (1978). How many types of giftedness can your program tolerate?Journal of Creative Behavior, 12, 39–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar