Argumentation in Educational Policy Disputes: Competing Visions of Quality and Equity

References

• abcde. (2011). An open letter to the DCPS. Retrieved from http://abcde.teachforus.org/2011/04/11/an-open-letter-to-dcps/.
   Google Scholar
• Anagnostopoulos, D., Rutledge, S., & Jacobsen, R. (Eds.). (2013). The infrastructure of accountability: Data use and the transformation of American education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Thevenot, L. (1999a). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Thevenot, L. (1999b). The sociology of critical capacity. European Journal of Social Theory, 2, 359–377.
   Google Scholar
• Cintron, A. (2014, February 19). Teacher evaluation, Part 2: In high-poverty schools, classroom observations miss the mark. Retrieved from http://greatergreatereducation.org/post/21758/teacher-evaluations-part-2-in-high-poverty-schools-classroom-observations-miss-the-mark/.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, R. (2011). District of Columbia Public Schools: Defining instructional expectations and aligning accountability and support. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
   Google Scholar
• DeVore, V., & Cheers, I. (2010, July 23). D.C. schools chief Rhee fires 241 teachers using new evaluation system. The Rundown, PBS Newshour. Retrieved from http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/dc-schools-chief-rhee-fires-241-teachers-using-new-evaluation-system/.
   Google Scholar
• Education Trust & TNTP. (2014). Building a foundation for equitable access: Webinar with Houston Independent School District and Washington, D.C. Public Schools. Retrieved from http://edtrust.org/resource/building-a-foundation-for-equitable-access/.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L. (2011). A D.C. teacher's troubled experience with IMPACT. The Answer Sheet Blog. Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, S. (2010, July 23). D.C. school system fires 241 teachers. CNN. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2010/US/07/23/district.of.columbia.teachers.fired/.
   Google Scholar
• Jacquemain, M. (2008). Boltanski: A sociology of actions, regimes, polities, worlds and grammar. Retrieved from http://orbi.ulg.ac.be/bitstream/2268/90314/1/Boltanski's%20moral%20sociology%20and%20his%20implicit%20theory%20of%20ideology.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jagd, S. (2011). Pragmatic sociology and competing orders of worth in organizations. European Journal of Social Theory, 14, 343–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamont, M. (2012). Toward a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 201–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, D. (2011). Policy as numbers: ac/counting for educational research. Australian Educational Research, 38(5), 355–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., Sellar, S., & Savage, G. C. (2014). Re-articulating social justice as equity in schooling policy: the effects of testing and data infrastructures. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 35, 710–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, K., & Niemann, D. (2013). When do numbers count? The differential impact of the PISA rating and ranking on educational policy in Germany and the US. German Politics, 22, 314–332. doi:10.1080/09644008.2013.794455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2007). Education and training policy No more failures Ten Steps to equity in education. Paris, France: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2013). PISA 2012 Results: Excellence through equity (Volume II): Giving Every Student the Chance to Succeed. Paris, France: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Pallas, A. (2010, July 28). Were some D.C. teachers fired based on flawed calculations? The Answer Sheet Blog. Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com.
   Google Scholar
• Patriotta, G., Gond, J. P., & Schultz, F. (2011). Maintaining legitimacy: Controversies, orders of worth, and public justification. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 1804–1836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perschke, A. (2011, August 16). D.C. teacher tells chancellor why IMPACT evaluation is unfair. The Answer Sheet Blog. Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com.
   Google Scholar
• Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, T. (1995). Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, D. (2013). Data before the fact. In L. Gitelman (Ed) ‘Raw data’ is an oxymoron. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• TNTP. (2013). The positive impact of IMPACT. Retrieved from http://tntp.org/blog/post/the-positive-impact-of-impact.
   Google Scholar
• Turque, B. (2010a, July 24). Rhee dismisses 241 teachers in the District; Union vows to challenge firings as result of new evaluations. The Washington Post, p. 1A.
   Google Scholar
• Turque, B. (2010b, September 13). Final count on fired teachers. The Washington Post, pp. 2B.
   Google Scholar
• Van Zanten, A. (2008). Competition and interaction between research knowledge and state knowledge in policy steering in France. In J. Ozga, T. Seddon, & T. Popkewitz (Eds), Education research and policy: steering the knowledge-based economy (pp. 259–269). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Washington DC Public Schools. (2009). IMPACT: The District of Columbia Public Schools effectiveness assessment system for school-based personnel, 2009–2010, Group 1. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Washington DC Public Schools. (2013). Teacher performance improved under DC's teacher evaluation system, new study finds. Washington, DC: Author  Retrieved from http://www.dcps.dc.gov.
   Google Scholar
• Washington DC Public Schools. (2014a). IMPACT, The District of Columbia Public Schools effectiveness assessment system for school-based personnel: Grades 1–12, General education teachers with individual value- added student achievement data, Group 1, 2014–2015. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Washington DC Public Schools. (2014b). IMPACT, The District of Columbia Public Schools effectiveness assessment system for school-based personnel: Grades 1–12, General education teachers without individual value- added student achievement data, Group 2, 2014–2015. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Washington DC Public Schools. (2014c). Lessons learned from four years of implementation in DC Public Schools: An overview. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar