498
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Argumentation and Education in Democratic Society

Argumentation and Decision Making in Professional Practice

References

  • Addis, W. (1990). Structural engineering: The nature of theory and design. New York, NY: Ellis Horwood Limited.
  • Besnard, P., & Hunter, A. (2008). Elements of argumentation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Davis, P. J. (2015). Unity and disunity and other mathematical essays. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
  • Dung, P. M. (1995). On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming, and n–person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77, 321–357.
  • Dworkin, R. (1986). Law's empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Dym, C. L. (1994). Engineering design: A synthesis of views. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Federal Baseball Club v. National League. 259 U.S. 200 (1922).
  • Flood v. Kuhn. 407 U.S. 258 (1972).
  • Fox, J. (2002). Quality and safety of clinical decision support technologies: A discussion of the role of formal methods. Proceedings of the International Conference on Integrated Design and Process Technology, IDPT-2002. Pasadena, CA.
  • Fox, J. (2011a). Arguing about the evidence. In P. Dawid, W. Twining, & M. Vasilaki (Eds.), Evidence, inference and enquiry (pp. 152–181). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Fox, J. (2011b). Artificial cognitive systems: Where does argumentation fit in? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 78–79.
  • Fox, J., Glasspool, D., Grecu, D., Modgil, S., South, M., & Patkar, V. (2007). Argumentation-based inference and decision making—A medical perspective. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22(6), 34–41.
  • Gainsburg, J. (2007). The mathematical disposition of structural engineers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 477–506.
  • Gainsburg, J. (2006). The mathematical modeling of structural engineers. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8, 3–36.
  • Health Foundation. (2012, December). Using safety cases in industry and healthcare. London, UK: Health Foundation  Retrieved from http://www.health.org.uk/sites/default/files/UsingSafetyCasesInIndustryAndHealthcare.pdf.
  • Koen, B. V. (2003). Discussion of the method: Conducting the engineer's approach to problem solving. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lindley, D. V. (1985). Making decisions (2nd ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011). Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 34, 57–111.
  • Schauer, F. (2012). Precedent. In A. Marmor (Ed.), The Routledge companion to the philosophy of law (pp. 123–136). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Smith v. United States. 508 U.S. 223 (1993).
  • Solan, L. M. (2010). The language of statutes. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. Casey. 499 U.S. 83 (1991).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.