Academic Integrity as a Teaching & Learning Issue: From Theory to Practice

References

• Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrantes, J. L., Seabra, C., & Lages, L. F. (2007). Pedagogical affect, student interest, and learning performance. Journal of Business Research, 60, 960–964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrose, S., Bridges, M. W., Lovett, M. C., DiPietro, M., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: 7 research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Anderman, E. M., Griesinger, T., & Westerfield, G. (1998). Motivation and cheating during early adolescence, Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 84–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashworth, P., Bannister, P., & Thorne, P. (1997). Guilty in whose eyes? University students’ perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 22, 187–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazerman, M. H., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (2011). Blind spots: Why we fail to do what’s right and what to do about it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bertram Gallant, T. (2008). Academic integrity in the twenty-first century: A teaching and learning imperative. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18, 57–75.
   Google Scholar
• Blasco-Arcas, L., Buil, I., Hernandez-Ortega, B., & Sese, F.J. (2013). Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance. Computers & Education, 62, 102–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, M., Seli, H., & Rosenthal, J. (2013). “Clickers” and metacognition: A quasi-experimental comparative study about metacognitive self-regulation and use of electronic feedback devices. Computers & Education, 65, 56–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braxton, J. M. (2011). Improprieties in teaching and learning. In T. Bertram Gallant (Ed), Creating the ethical academy: Understanding misconduct and empowering change in higher education (pp. 63–82). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69, 970–977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, N. E., Hudson, D., Dobies, P. R., & Waris, R. (2011). Student or situation? Personality and classroom context as predictors of attitudes about business school cheating. Social Psychology of Education, 14, 261–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donald, J. (1997). Improving the environment for learning: Academic leaders talk about what works. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Heaslip, G., Donovan, P., & Cullen, J.G. (2014). Student response systems and learner engagement in large classes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 15, 11–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith-Spiegel, P., Tabachnick, B. G., Whitley, Jr., B. E., & Washburn, J. (1998). Why professors ignore cheating: Opinions of a national sample of psychology instructors. Ethics & Behavior, 8, 215–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kember, D., Ho, A., & Hong, C. (2008). The importance of establishing relevance in motivating student learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9, 249–263.
   Google Scholar
• King, A. (1993). From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College Teaching, 41, 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4, 193–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. Journal of Economic Education, 31, 30–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, J. M. (2013). Cheating lessons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mazur, E. (2009). Farewell, lecture? Science, 323, 50–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meece, J. L., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Reviews in Psychology, 57, 487–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J. (1990). How critical reflection triggers transformative learning. In J. Mezirow and Associates (Eds), Fostering critical reflection in adulthood (pp. 1–20). San Francisco, MA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Murdock T. B., & Anderman, E. M. (2006). Motivational perspectives on student cheating: Toward an integrated model of academic dishonesty, Educational Psychologist, 41, 131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdock, T. B., Beauchamp, A. S., & Hinton, A. M. (2008). Predictors of cheating and cheating attributions: Does classroom context influence cheating and blame for cheating? European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23, 477–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdock, T. B., Miller, A., & Kohlhardt, J. (2004). Effects of classroom context variables on high school students’ judgments of the acceptability and likelihood of cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 765–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdock, T. B., Miller, A. D., & Goetzinger, A. (2007). Effects of classroom context on university students’ judgments about cheating: Mediating and moderating process. Social Psychology of Education, 10, 141–169.
   Google Scholar
• Newbury, P. (2016). Getting the most out of peer instruction (Blog entry, January 2). Rertrieved March 1, 2016 from http://www.peternewbury.org/
   Google Scholar
• Palazzo, D. J., Lee, Y., Warnakulasooriya, R., & Pritchard, D. E. (2010). Patterns, correlates, and reduction of homework copying, Physics Review Special Topics–Physics Education Research, 6, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J. C. (2008). The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: A meta-analysis of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 270–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 223–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulvers, K., & Diekhoff, G. M. (1999). The relationship between academic dishonesty and college classroom environment. Research in Higher Education, 40, 487–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sibley, J., & Robinson, B. (2016). A roadmap to TBL module development. Retrieved from http://learntbl.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Part2_4S_module_creating_reading_v0.7.docx
   Google Scholar
• Tlhoaele, M., Hofman, A., Naidoo, A., & Winnips, J. C. (2013). Using clickers to facilitate interactive engagement activities in a lecture room for improved performance by students. Innovation in Education and Teaching International, 51, 497–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vliet, E. A., Winnips, J. C., & Brouwer, N. (2015). Flipped-class pedagogy enhances student metacognition and collaborative-learning strategies in higher education but effect does not persist. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 14, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar