References
- Allan, D. (1997). The secrets of in-service training. NovELTy, 4, 43–55.
- Baetens-Beardsmore, H. (Ed.). (1993). European models of bilingual education. Clevedon, US: Multilingual Matters.
- Ball, P. (2014). CLIL and competences: Assessment. British Council Regional Policy Dialogues 2013–2014, 76–83. Retrieved from https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/bc_regional_policy_dialogues.pdf
- Ball, P., Kelly, K., & Clegg, J. (2015). Putting CLIL into practice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Bentley, K. (2010). The TKT course CLIL module. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Beobide, H., & Ball, P. (2009). Geography 3. San Sebastián, SP: Ikastolen Elkartea.
- Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32, 347–364.
- Clegg, J. (2002). The language of thinking. In Science Across the World (Ed.), Ethical English: Teaching language through content and content through language (pp. 97–99). Sofia, BG: Science Across the World and The British Council.
- Coyle, D. (2005). Developing CLIL: Towards a theory of practice. APAC Monograph, 6, 5–29.
- Coyle, D. (2008). Content and language integrated learning: Motivating learners and teachers. Retrieved from http://blocs.xtec.cat/clilpractiques1/files/2008/11/slrcoyle.pdf
- Georgiou, I. S. (2012). Reviewing the puzzle of CLIL. ELT Journal, 66, 495–504. doi:10.1093/elt/ccs047
- Gondoavá, D. (2015). Selecting, adapting and creating CLIL materials. In S. Pokrivcáková, (Ed.), CLIL in foreign language education (pp. 151–163). Nitra, SK: Constantine the Philosopher University.
- Grellet, F. (1981). Developing reading skills: A practical guide to reading comprehension exercises. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Guerrini, M. (2009). CLIL materials as scaffolds to learning. In D. Marsh, P. Mehisto, D. Wolff, R. Aliaga, T. Asikainen, M. J. Frigols, … G. Langé (Eds.), CLIL practice: Perspectives from the field (pp. 74–78). Jyväskylä, FI: University of Jyväskylä.
- Hattie, J. (2015). The applicability of visible learning to higher education. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1, 79–91. doi:10.1037/stl0000021
- Kelly, K. (2010). CLIL interview with Keith Kelly. Retrieved from http://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/think/articles/interview-keith-kelly
- Lee, C. (2006). Language for learning mathematics: Assessment for learning in practice. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
- Mehisto, P. (2012). Criteria for producing CLIL learning material. Encuentro, 21, 15–33. Retrieved from http://www.unifg.it/sites/default/files/allegatiparagrafo/21-01-2014/mehisto_criteria_for_producing_clil_learning_material.pdf
- Meyer, O. (2010). Towards quality CLIL: Successful planning and teaching strategies. Pulso, 33, 11–29.
- Meyer, O. (2014). A pluriliteracies approach to content and language integrated learning – Mapping learner progressions in knowledge construction and meaning-making. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28, 41–57. doi:10.1080/07908318.2014.1000924
- Roegiers, X. (2000). Une pédagogie de l’integration. Competences et l’integration des acquis dans l’enseignement. Brussels, Belgium: De Boeck.
- Thornbury, S. (2000). A dogma for EFL. IATEFL Issues, 153, 2.