Risk management algorithm for rear-side collision avoidance using a combined steering torque overlay and differential braking

References

• Huang S, Ren W, Chan SC. Design and performance evaluation of mixed manual and automated control traffic. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyb A. 2000;30(6):661–673. doi: 10.1109/3468.895889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tideman M, van der Voort MC, van Arem B, Tillema F. A review of lateral driver support systems. Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference; 2007 Sept 30–Oct 3; Seattle, WA, p. 992–999.
   Google Scholar
• Habenicht S, Winner H, Bone S, Sasse F, Korzeniet P. A maneuver-based lane change assistance system. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium; 2011 Jun 5–9; Germany, p. 375–380.
   Google Scholar
• Najm WG, Stearns MD, Yanagisawa M. Pre-crash scenario typology for crash avoidance research. Washington (DC): National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA); 2007. (Report No. DOT HS 810 767).
   Google Scholar
• Sepulcre M, Gozalvez J. On the importance of application requirements in cooperative vehicular Communications. International conference on wireless on-demand network systems and services; 2011 Jan 26–28; Bardonecchia, Italy, p. 124–131.
   Google Scholar
• Jin LS, Fang WP, Zhang YN, Yang SB, Hou HJ. Research on safety lane change model of driver assistant system on highway. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium; 2009 June 3–5; Xi'an, China, p. 1051–1056.
   Google Scholar
• Jula H, Kosmatopoulos EB, Ioannou PA. Collision avoidance analysis for lane changing and merging. IEEE Trans Veh Technol. 2000;49:2295–2308. doi: 10.1109/25.901899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eidehall A, Pohl J, Gustafsson F. A new approach to lane guidance systems. Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference; 2005 Sept 13–15; Vienna, Austria, p. 108–112.
   Google Scholar
• Minoiu N, Netto M, Mammar S, Lusetti B. Driver steering assistance for lane departure avoidance. Control Eng Pract. 2009;17(6):642–651. doi: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2008.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Choi J, Yi K, Shin M, Ko B. Lane-keeping assistance control algorithm using differential braking to prevent unintended lane departures. Control Eng Pract. 2014;23:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2013.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayakawa Y, Sato K, Kobayashi M. Development of blind spot assistance system based on lane-marker detection and blind spot vehicle detection. Fast-zero 2011, Tokyo, Japan; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Minoiu N, Mammar S, Glaser S, Lusetti B. Driver assistance system for lane departure avoidance by steering and differential braking. in 6th IFAC Symposium Advances in Automotive Control; 2010 Jul 12–14; Munich, Germany, p. 471–476.
   Google Scholar
• Kasuya K, Suzuki M. Effects of support level of direct yaw moment control systems on driver's obstacle avoidance behavior, Fast-zero 2011. Tokyo, Japan; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Minoiu N, Netto M, Mammar S, Glaser S. A new strategy for lane departure avoidance. IEEE International Conference on Control Applications; 2006 Oct 4–6; Munich, Germany, p. 897–902.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang J, Huh K, Na H, Jung H, Kang H, Yoon P. Development of a model based predictive controller for lane keeping assistance. SAE Transaction, Paper no. 2008-01-1454.
   Google Scholar
• Kothare MV, Balakrishnan V, Morari M. Robust constrained model predictive control using linear matrix inequalities. Automatica. 1996;32:1361–1379. doi: 10.1016/0005-1098(96)00063-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tim D, Geert AJ, Heijden. VisionSense: an advanced lateral collision warning system. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium; 2005 Jun 6–8; Las Vegas, NV, USA, p. 296–301.
   Google Scholar
• Mar J, Lin HT. The car-following and lane-changing prevention system based on the cascaded fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans Veh Tech. 2005;54(3):910–924. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2005.844655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon S, Kang H, Yi K. Multi-vehicle target selection for adaptive cruise control. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2010;48(11):1325–1343. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2010.499952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ference JJ, Szabo S, Najm WG. Objective test scenarios for integrated vehicle-based safety systems. Proceedings of the 20th international Technical Conference on Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV'07); 2007 Jun 18–21; Lyon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Lee T, Yi K, Jeong C. Integrated stochastic driver model for evaluation of the vehicle active safety systems. Fast-zero 2011, Tokyo, Japan; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Mammar S, Glaser S, Netto M. Time to line crossing for lane departure avoidance: a theoretical study and an experimental setting. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst. 2006;7(2):226–241. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2006.874707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angkititrakul P, Terashima R, Wakita T. On the use of stochastic driver behavior model in lane departure warning. IEEE Trans Intell Transport Syst. 2011;12(1):174–183. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2010.2072502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajamani R. Vehicle dynamics and control. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia CE, Prett DM. Model predictive control: theory and practice-a survey. Automatica. 1989;25:335–348. doi: 10.1016/0005-1098(89)90002-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon WH, Han S. Receding horizon control – model predictive control for state models. London: Springer-Verlag London Limited; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Muske KR, Rawlings JB. Model predictive control with linear models. AICHE J. 1993;39:262–287. doi: 10.1002/aic.690390208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahinet P, Nemirovski A, Laub J, Chilali M. LMI control tool box: for use with MATLAB. Natick: The Mathworks; 1995.
   Google Scholar