Optimal control of motorsport differentials

References

• Tremlett A, Assadian F, Purdy D, Vaughan N, Moore A, Halley M. Quasi steady state linearisation of the racing vehicle acceleration envelope: a limited slip differential example. Vehicle Syst Dyn: Int J Vehicle Mech Mobil. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Brayshaw D. The use of numerical optimisation to determine on-limit handling behaviour of race cars. [PhD thesis], Department of Automotive, Mechanical and Structural Engineering, Cranfield University; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly DP. Lap time simulation with transient vehicle and tyre dynamics. [PhD thesis], Cranfield University, School of Engineering, Automotive Studies Group; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Wright P. Formula 1 Technology. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE); 2001, p86.
   Google Scholar
• FIA technical regulations [cited 2013 June 3], Available from: www.fia.com/sport/regulations.
   Google Scholar
• Perantoni G, Limebeer DJ. Optimal control for a formula one car with variable parameters. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timings JP, Cole DJ. Minimum manoeuvre time calculation using convex optimization. J Dyn Syst Meas Cont. 2013;135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casanova D, Sharp RS, Symonds P. Minimum time manoeuvring: the significance of yaw inertia. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2000;34:77–115. doi: 10.1076/0042-3114(200008)34:2;1-G;FT077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavernini D, Massaro M, Velenis E, Katzourakis DI, Lot R. Minimum time cornering: the effect of road surface and car transmission layout. Vehicle Syst Dyn. 2013;51:1533–1547. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2013.813557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacejka HB. Tyre and vehicle dynamics. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson AE, Ho Y. Applied optimal control: optimization, estimation and control. Abingdon, Oxon: Taylor and Francis; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Milliken WF, Milliken DL. Race car vehicle dynamics. Warrendale, Pa: SAE; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Tavernini D, Velenis E, Lot R, Massaro M. The optimality of the handbrake cornering technique. ASME J Dyn Syst Meas Cont. 2014;136:041019-1--041019-11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolazzi E, Biral F, Da Lio M. Symbolic-numeric efficient solution of optimal control problems for multibody systems. J Comput Appl Math. 2006;185:404–421. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2005.03.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betts X. Practical methods for optimal control and estimation using nonlinear programming. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM); 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Pesch HJ. A practical guide to the solution of real-life optimal control problems. Cont Cybern. 1994;23(1/2):7–60.
   Google Scholar
• Bertolazzi E, Biral F, Da Lio M. Real-time motion planning for multibody systems. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2007;17:119–139. doi: 10.1007/s11044-007-9037-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massaro M, Cole DJ. Neuromuscular-steering dynamics: motorcycle riders vs car drivers. ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, 2012 October 17–19, Fort Lauderdale, FL; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Knisley S. A correlation between rolling tire contact friction energy and indoor tread wear. Tire Sci Technol. 2002;30(2):83–99. doi: 10.2346/1.2135251
   Google Scholar
• Da Silva MM, Cunha RH, Neto AC. A simplified model for evaluating tire wear during conceptual design. Int J Auto Tech. 2012;13(6):915–922. doi: 10.1007/s12239-012-0092-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veith AG. The most complex tire-pavement interaction: tire wear. ASTM Special Technical Publication. 1986;929:125–158.
   Google Scholar
• Radt H, Van Dis D. Vehicle handling responses using stability derivatives. SAE Technical Paper 960483; 1996. doi:10.4271/960483.
   Google Scholar
• Yi J, Li J, Lu J, Liu Z. On the stability and agility of aggressive vehicle manoeuvres: a pendulum-turn manoeuvre example. Control Systems Technology, IEEE Transactions. 2012;20(3):663–676. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2011.2121908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar