Determining damping characteristics of railway-overhead-wire system for finite-element analysis

References

• Wu TX, Brenan MJ. Dynamic stiffness of a railway overhead wire system and its effect on pantograph-catenary system dynamics. J Sound Vib. 1999;219:483–502. doi: 10.1006/jsvi.1998.1869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou N, Li RP, Wang SX. Investigation on the wave propagation characteristics of the catenary. In: Pombo J, editor. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Railway Technology: Research, Development and Maintenance; Corsica, France; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg T. Moving force on an axially loaded beam with applications to a railway overhead contact wire. Veh Syst Dyn. 2006;44:631–644. doi: 10.1080/00423110500165523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsuo A, Mitsuru I, Sei N. Analyses of contact force fluctuation between catenary and pantograph. Quarterly Reports of RTRI. 2000;41:182–187. doi: 10.2219/rtriqr.41.182
   Google Scholar
• Manabe K, Fujii Y. Overhead systems resonance with multi-pantographs and counter measures. Quarterly Reports of RTRI. 1989;30:175–180.
   Google Scholar
• Hayasaka T. Effect of reduced reflective wave propagation on overhead contact line in overlap section. Quart Rep RTRI. 2004;45:68–73. doi: 10.2219/rtriqr.45.68
   Google Scholar
• Cho YH, Lee JM, Park SY, Lee ES. Robust measurement of damping ratios of a railway contact wire using wavelet transforms. Key Eng Mater. 2006;321–323:1629–1635. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.321-323.1629
   Google Scholar
• Lardies J, Ta MN, Erthillier M. Modal parameter estimation based on the wavelet transform of output data. Arch Appl Mech. 2004;73:718–733. doi: 10.1007/s00419-004-0329-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le T-P, Argoul A. Continuous wavelet transform for modal identification using free decay response. J Sound Vib. 2004;277:73–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jsv.2003.08.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi J-P, Balmes E, Bobillot A, et al. Using modal damping for full model transient analysis: application to pantograph/catenary vibration. In: Sas P, Bergen B, editor. Proceedings of ISMA2010 – International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering Including USD2010; 2010; Leuven (Belgium); 2010 Sept 20–22.
   Google Scholar
• Vo Van O, Balmes E, Lorang X. Damping characterization of a high speed train catenary. Poster session presented at: Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Dynamics of Vehicles on Roads and Tracks (IAVSD 2015); 2015 Aug 17–21.Graz, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Bruni S, Ambrosio J, Carnicero A, et al. The results of the pantograph–catenary interaction benchmark. Veh Syst Dyn. 2014;3:412–435.
   Google Scholar
• Leger P, Asce M, Dussault S. Seismic-energy dissipation in MDOF structures. J Struct Eng. 1992;118:1251–1270. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:5(1251)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeary AP. The description and measurement of nonlinear damping in structures. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod. 1996;59:103–114. doi: 10.1016/0167-6105(96)00002-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall JF. Problems encountered from the use (or misuse) of Rayleigh damping. Earthq Eng Struct D. 2006;35:525–545. doi: 10.1002/eqe.541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kareem A, Gurley K. Damping in structures: its evaluation and treatment of uncertainty. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod. 1996;59:131–157. doi: 10.1016/0167-6105(96)00004-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai C, Zheng H, Khan MS, et al. Modeling of material damping properties in ANSYS. ANSYS 2002 Users Conference and Exhibition. Pittsburgh. 2002 Apr.
   Google Scholar
• Puthanpurayil AM, Dhakal RP, et al. Modelling of in-structure damping: a review of the state-of-the-art. In: Ma Q, Ingham J, editors. Proceedings of the Ninth Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering Building an Earthquake-Resilient Society. Auckland, New Zealand, 14–16 Apr 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Tamura Y, Suganuma S-Y. Evaluation of amplitude-dependent damping and natural frequency of buildings during strong winds. J Wind Eng Ind Aerod. 1996;59:115–130. doi: 10.1016/0167-6105(96)00003-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guanghan Z. Data process and accuracy analysis of damping measurement. J HuNan Univ. 1988;15:110–121.
   Google Scholar
• Slavic J, Simonnovski I, Boltezar M. Damping identification using a continuous wave transform: application to real data. J Sound Vib. 2003;262:291–307. doi: 10.1016/S0022-460X(02)01032-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ülker-Kaustell M, Karoumi R. Application of the continuous wavelet transform on the free vibrations of a steel–concrete composite railway bridge. Eng Struct. 2011;33:911–919. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amiri MM, Yahyai M. Estimation of damping ratio of TV towers based on ambient vibration monitoring. Struct Des Tall Spec. 2013;22:862–875. doi: 10.1002/tal.733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RedaTaha MM, Noureldin A, Lcero JL. Wavelet transform for structural health monitoring: a compendium of uses and features. Struct Health Monit. 2006;5:267–296. doi: 10.1177/1475921706067741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang M, Tangwen Y, Jianda H. Review on image edge detection technologies. J Central South Univ (Sci Technol). 2011;42(Suppl.1):811–816. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Delprat N, Escudie B, Guillemain P, Kronland-Martinet R, Tchamitchian P, Torresani B. Asymptotic wavelet and Gabor analysis: extraction of instantaneous frequencies. IEEE T Inform Theory. 1992;38:644–664. doi: 10.1109/18.119728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chao W, Hongping Z, Bo Z. Identifying damping ratio of cable structures using complex wavelet transform. J Huazhong Univ Sci Tech. (Nat Sci Ed). 2012;40:115–119. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Mohammad DRA, Khan NU. On the role of Rayleigh damping. J Sound Vib. 1995;185:207–218. doi: 10.1006/jsvi.1995.0376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury I, Dasgupta SP. Computation of Rayleigh damping coefficients for structures with large degrees of freedom. Elect J Geotech Eng. 2003;8:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Ju S-H, Ni S-H. Determining Rayleigh damping parameters of soils for finite element analysis. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech. 2007;31:1239–1255. doi: 10.1002/nag.598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danguang P. An optimization solution for Rayleigh damping coefficients in seismic response analysis. Eng Mech. 2013;30:16–22. (in Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Wavelab 850. A collection of Matlab functions to implement a variety of algorithms related to wavelet analysis [Internet]. Stanford: Stanford University [cited 2016 Jul 2]. Available from: http://statweb.stanford.edu/~wavelab/
   Google Scholar