Longitudinal train dynamics: an overview

References

• Cole C. Longitudinal train dynamics. In: Iwnicki S, editor. Handbook of railway vehicle dynamics. Chapter 9. London: Taylor & Francis; 2006. p. 239–278.
   Google Scholar
• Wang F. Vehicle system dynamics. Beijing: China Railway Publishing House; 1994 ( Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Grag VK, Dukkipati RV. Dynamics of railway vehicle systems. New York (NY): Academic Press; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Grebenyuk PT. Braking dynamics of heavy haul trains. Moscow: Transport Publishing House; 1977 ( Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Raidt JB, Shum KL, Martin GC, et al. User’s documentation, detailed vertical train stability model. Chicago (IL): Association of American Railroads (AAR); 1977. (Technical report no. R-256).
   Google Scholar
• El-Sibaie M. Dynamic buff and draft testing techniques. Pueblo (CO): Association of American Railroads Transportation Test Center (AAR/TTC); Oct 1992. (Report NO. R-FRA/ORD92-31).
   Google Scholar
• Cole C, McClanachan M, Spiryagin M, et al. Wagon instability in long trains. Veh Syst Dyn. 2012;50(s1):303–317. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2012.659742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovalev R, Sakalo A, Yazykov V, et al. Simulation of longitudinal train dynamics of freight train operating through a car dumper. Veh Syst Dyn. 2016;54(6):707–722. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2016.1153115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi Z, Huang Z, Kong X. Simulation of longitudinal dynamics of long freight trains in positioning operations. Veh Syst Dyn. 2012;50(9):1049–1433. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2012.661063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole C, Sun Y, Spiryagin M. Longitudinal train dynamics during indexer train unloading operations. Paper presented at: The international heavy haul conference (IHHA 2015); 2015 Jun 21–24; Perth, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Sillcox LK. Mastering momentum: a discussion of modern transport trends and their influence upon the equipment of American railways. New York (NY): Simmons-Boardman Publishing Corporation; 1955.
   Google Scholar
• Birkin D, Cole C, Bosomworth C, et al. (2014). Elimination of low frequency linear vibrations in long heavy haul consists. Paper presented at: 2014 conference on railway excellence (CORE 2014); May 5–7; Adelaide, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Pipes LA. Analysis of longitudinal motions of trains by the electrical analog. J Appl Phys. 1942;13:780–786. doi: 10.1063/1.1714832
   Google Scholar
• Kerr K, Blair JR. Simulation of the longitudinal dynamics of a train. Paper presented at: 1977 dynamics of multibody systems symposium; Aug 29–Sep 3, 1977; Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Wu Q. Optimisations of draft gear designs for heavy haul trains [PhD thesis]. Rockhampton, (Australia): Central Queensland University; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Shabana AA, Ding L, Aboubakr AK. Use of the non-inertial coordinates in the analysis of train longitudinal forces. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn. 2011;7(1):011001/1–011001/10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blokhin YP, Manashki LA. Mathematical train dynamics models developed by Lazarian and his students. Bull Dnipropetrovsk Natl Univ Railway Transport. 2009;30:12–23 ( Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Myamlin SV, Kolesnykova TA. Development of scientific school of transport mechanics: artistic legacy of YE. P. Blokhin. Science and transport progress. Bull Dnipropetrovsk Natl Univ Railway Transport. 2014;49(1):7–21. doi: 10.15802/stp2014/22657
   Google Scholar
• Oprea RA, Cruceanu C, Spiroiu MA. Alternative friction models for braking train dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn. 2013;51(3):460–480. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2012.744459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Q, Cole C, Luo S, et al. A review of dynamics modelling of friction draft gear. Veh Syst Dyn. 2014;52(6):733–758. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2014.894199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhukovskii NE. Work (effort) through Russian and American traction devices when starting a train from a place and at the beginning of its motion. Bull Exp Inst Railways. 1919;13:31–57. Russian.
   Google Scholar
• Lazaryan VA, Lapkin BD. Application of electromechanical analogies and simulations to study the impact of mechanical systems. Tr.DIIT. 1951;21:13–32 ( Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Pankin A. The proliferation of strong disturbances in the train. Sci Notes VZIITa. 1961;7:105–166. Russian.
   Google Scholar
• Young CB. Report of draft gear tests. New York (NY): Simmons-Boardman Publishing Company; 1921.
   Google Scholar
• Nikolskii LN. Friction shock absorbers: the calculation and design. Moscow: Mechanical Engineering Publishing House; 1964 ( Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Wu Q, Spiryagin M, Cole C. Advanced dynamic modelling for friction draft gears. Veh Syst Dyn. 2015;53(4):475–492. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2014.1002504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin GC, Hay WW. Method of analysis for determining the coupler forces and longitudinal motion of a long freight train. Urbana (IL): University of Illinois; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Low EM, Garg VK. Programming manual detailed longitudinal train action model. Chicago (IL): Association of American Railroads (AAR); 1978. (Technical Report No. R-296).
   Google Scholar
• Genin J, Ginsberg JH, Ting EC. Longitudinal track-train dynamics: a new approach. J Dyn Syst Meas Control. 1974;96(4):466–469. doi: 10.1115/1.3426847
   Google Scholar
• de Pater AD. The longitudinal vibrations of long trains composed of identical cars caused by braking forces. Veh Syst Dyn. 1975;4(2–3):75–76. doi: 10.1080/00423117508968463
   Google Scholar
• Sun X, Chen Q. A fast algorithm of longitudinal train dynamics. Paper presented at: The fourth international heavy haul railway conference; 1989 Sep 11–15; Brisbane, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Klauser PE. Advances in the simulation of long train longitudinal dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn. 1988;17(s1):210–214. doi: 10.1080/00423118808969261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transportation Technology Center, Inc. Technical manual: simulation of train action to reduce cost of operations (STARCO). Pueblo (CO): Transportation Technology Center, Inc.; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen DR, Booth GF, Vithani AR, et al. Train energy and dynamics simulator (TEDS)-A state-of-the-art longitudinal train dynamics simulator. Paper presented at: The ASME 2012 rail transportation division fall technical conference (RTDF2012); 2012 Oct 16–17; Omaha NE.
   Google Scholar
• Muller L, Dirk H, Witt T. TRAIN – a computer model for the simulation of longitudinal dynamics in trains. Paper presented at: 1998 conference on railway engineering; 1998 Sep 7–9; Rockhampton, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Witt T, Muller L. Methods for the validation of algorithms for the simulation of longitudinal dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn. 1999;33(S):386–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantone L, Karbstein R, Müller L, et al. Train dynamic simulation – a new approach. Paper presented at: the 8th world congress on railway research; 2008 May 18–22; Seoul, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Belforte P, Cheli F, Diana G, et al. Numerical and experimental approach for the evaluation of severe longitudinal dynamics of heavy freight trains. Veh Syst Dyn. 2008;46(s1):937–955. doi: 10.1080/00423110802037180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun X. Technical manual of detailed train operation simulation program (TOS-A). Chegdu (China): Rail Vehicle Institute of Southwest Jiaotong University; 1989 ( Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Geng Z. Heavy-haul transportation technologies on Datong-Qinhuangdao railway. Beijing: China Railway Publishing House; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Wu Q, Luo S, Cole C. Longitudinal dynamics and energy analysis for heavy haul trains. J Mod Transport. 2014;2(3):127–136. doi: 10.1007/s40534-014-0055-x
   Google Scholar
• Zhai W. Two simple fast integration methods for large-scale dynamic problems in engineering. Int J Numer Meth Eng. 1996;39(24):4199–4214. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19961230)39:24<4199::AID-NME39>3.0.CO;2-Y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole C. Longitudinal train dynamics: characteristics, modelling, simulation and neural network prediction for Central Queensland coal trains [PhD Thesis]. Rockhampton (Australia): Central Queensland University; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Wei W, Xue Q. Study of heavy haul freight wagon buffer model based on BP neural network. J Dalian Jiaotong Univ. 2012;33(6):1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Pugi L, Fioravanti D, Rindi A. Modelling the longitudinal dynamics of long freight trains during the braking phase. Paper presented at: The 12th IFToMM world congress; 2007 Jun 17–20; Besancon, France.
   Google Scholar
• Li F. Role in increasing route capacity through long freight trains [PhD thesis]. Aachen: Aachen University of Technology; 1998 (German).
   Google Scholar
• Oprea RA. A constrained motion perspective of railway vehicles collision. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2013;30(1):101–116. doi: 10.1007/s11044-013-9368-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheli F, Melzi S. Experimental characterization and modelling of a side buffer for freight trains. J Rail Rapid Transit. 2010;224(6):535–546. doi: 10.1243/09544097JRRT317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumont E, Maurer W. DyMoRail: a Modelica library for modelling railway buffers. Paper presented at: The 9th international modelica conference; 2012 Sep 3–5; Munich, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Belousov A. Development of design and numerical modelling of friction-polymer draft gears [PhD thesis]. Bryansk (Russia): Bryansk State University, 2006 (Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Cole C, Spiryagin M, Wu Q, et al. Modelling issues in passenger draft gear connections. Paper presented at: 24th international symposium on dynamics of vehicles on roads and tracks (IAVSD 2015); 2015 Aug 17–21; Graz, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Wu Q, Yang X, Cole C, et al. Modelling polymer draft gear. Veh Syst Dyn. 2016;54(9):1208–1225. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2016.1196822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikander OR. Draft-gear action in long trains. Trans ASME. 1935;57:317–334.
   Google Scholar
• Karvackii BL. Common theory of automatic brakes. Moscow: Transzheldorizdat, 1947. Russian.
   Google Scholar
• Grebenyuk PT. Lateral forces in freight trains with air and electro-pneumatic trains. In: Investigation of automatic braking equipment on the railways of USSR. Moscow: Transzheldorizdat; 1961:180–208 ( Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Lazaryan VA. Investigation of transient modes for train operations under full brake application and the transition through crests of longitudinal track profile. Collected Works DIIT. 1953;28:5–23. Russian.
   Google Scholar
• Lazaryan VA. Application of mathematical machines of continuous action for solving dynamics tasks of rolling stock. Moscow: Transzheldorizdat; 1962 ( Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Kuzmina EI. Choice of an optimal diagram for filling air brakes of a locomotive. Vestnik VNIIZHT. 1962;4:40–44 ( Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Computational Mechanics Ltd. Simulation of longitudinal train dynamics, user’s manual. Bryansk (Russia): Computational Mechanics Ltd.; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Nasr A, Mohammadi S. The effects of train brake delay time on in-train forces. J Rail Rapid Transit. 2010;224(6):523–534. doi: 10.1243/09544097JRRT306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadi S, Nasr A. Effects of the power unit location on in-train longitudinal forces during brake application. Int J Veh Syst Model Test. 2010;5(2/3):176–196. doi: 10.1504/IJVSMT.2010.037125
   Google Scholar
• Sun S. Research on heavy haul train longitudinal impulse dynamics [PhD thesis]. Chengdu (China): Southwest Jiaotong University; 2014 (Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Murtaza MA, Garg BL. Railway air brake simulation: an empirical approach. J Rail Rapid Transit. 1993;207(F1):51–56. doi: 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1993_207_226_02
   Google Scholar
• Afshari A, Specchia S, Shabana A, et al. A train air brake force model: car control unit and numerical results. J Rail Rapid Transit. 2013;227(1):38–55. doi: 10.1177/0954409712447231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Specchia S, Afshari A, Shabana A, et al. A train air brake force model: locomotive automatic brake valve and brake pipe flow formulations. J Rail Rapid Transit. 2013;227(1):19–37. doi: 10.1177/0954409712447230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdol-Hamid KS, Limbert DE, Gauthier RG, et al. Simulation of a freight train air brake system. Paper presented at: 1986 ASME winter annual meeting; 1986 7–12 December; Anaheim (CA).
   Google Scholar
• Johnson MR, Booth GF, Mattoon DW. Development of practical techniques for the simulation of train air brake operation. Paper presented at: 1986 ASME winter annual meeting; 1986 7–12 December; Anaheim (CA).
   Google Scholar
• Murtaza MA, Garg BL. Transient performance during a railway air brake release demand. J Rail Rapid Transit. 1990;204(F1):31–38. doi: 10.1243/PIME_PROC_1990_204_183_02
   Google Scholar
• Wei W, Lin Y. Simulation of a freight train brake system with 120 valves. J Rail Rapid Transit. 2009;223(1):85–92. doi: 10.1243/09544097JRRT119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piechowiak T. Pneumatic train brake simulation method. Veh Syst Dyn. 2009;47(12):1473–1492. doi: 10.1080/00423110802600946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aboubakr AK, Volpi M, Shabana AA, et al. Implementation of electronically controlled pneumatic brake formulation in longitudinal train dynamics algorithms. J Multi-Body Dyn. 2016. doi: 10.1177/1464419316628764.
   Google Scholar
• Pugi L, Malvezzi M, Allotta B, et al. A parametric library for the simulation of Union Internationale des Chemins de Fer (UIC) pneumatic braking system. J Rail Rapid Transit. 2004;218(2):117–132. doi: 10.1243/0954409041319632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith SV. A new train performance calculator. Trans Am Inst Elect Eng. 1951;70(1):657–660. doi: 10.1109/T-AIEE.1951.5060458
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore A. The application of digital computers to electric traction problems. Proceedings of the IEE – Part B: Radio and Electronic Engineering; 1956; paper No. 2113M: 59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Williams CG. Longitudinal dynamics of a long train during the dumping operation. Paper presented at: 1978 heavy haul railways conference; Sep 18–22; Perth, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Hay W. Railroad engineering, 2nd ed. New York (NY): Wiley; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Lukaszewicz P. Energy consumption and running time for trains. [PhD thesis]. Stockholm (Sweden): Royal Institute of Technology (KTH); 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Szanto F. Rolling resistance revisited. Paper presented at: 2016 conference on railway excellence (CORE 2016); 2016 May 16–18; Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Kim SW, Kwon HB, Kim YG, et al. Calculation of resistance to motion of a high-speed train using acceleration measurements in irregular coasting conditions. J Rail Rapid Transit. 2006;220(4):449–459. doi: 10.1243/0954409JRRT74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiryagin M, Wolfs P, Cole C, et al. Design and simulation of heavy haul locomotives and trains. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2016 (Ground Vehicle Engineering Series).
   Google Scholar
• Rao Z. Train brake. 2nd ed. Beijing (China): China Science Publishing House; 2010 ( Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• Thomas LR, MacMillan RD, Martin GC. User’s manual quasi-static lateral train stability model. Chicago (IL): Association of American Railroads (AAR); 1976. (Technical Report No. R-208).
   Google Scholar
• Dong S. Technical manual of vertical dynamics simulation program. Chegdu (China): Rail Vehicle Institute of Southwest Jiaotong University; 1989 ( Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• McClanachan M, Cole C, Roach D, et al. An investigation of the effect of bogie and wagon pitch associated with longitudinal train dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn. 2000;33(s):374–385.
   Google Scholar
• Wu Q, Luo S, Xu Z, et al. Coupler jackknifing and derailments of locomotives on tangent track. Veh Syst Dyn. 2013;51(11):1784–1800. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2013.830184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Z, Ma W, Wu Q, et al. Coupler rotation behaviour and its effect on heavy haul trains. Veh Syst Dyn. 2013;51(12):1818–1838. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2013.834369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou H, Zhang J, Hecht M. Three-dimensional derailment analysis of crashed freight trains. Veh Syst Dyn. 2014;52(3):341–361. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2014.881512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiryagin M, Wu Q, Szanto F, et al. Advanced studies on locomotive dynamics behaviour utilising co-simulation between multibody and dynamics packages. Paper presented at: 2016 conference on railway excellence (CORE 2016); 2016 May 16–18; Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Wei L, Zeng J, Wang Q. Investigation of in-train stability and safety assessment for railway vehicles during braking. J Mech Sci Technol. 2016;30(4):1507–1525. doi: 10.1007/s12206-016-0304-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei L, Zeng J, Chen K, et al. Vertical rotating behaviour of coupler for multiple units to multiple units rescue under braking conditions. J Traffic Transportation Eng. 2015;15(3):71–77.
   Google Scholar
• Hawthorne MJ, Nickles SK, Onodipe B; New York Air Brake Corporation. Train handing techniques and analysis. United State Patent US 6,332,106B1. 2001 Dec 18.
   Google Scholar
• Houpt PK, Bonanni PG, Chan DS, et al. Optimal control of heavy-haul freight trains to save fuel. Paper presented at: The 9th international heavy haul conference; 2009 June 22–24; Shanghai, China.
   Google Scholar
• Cole C, Simson S, Bosomworth C, et al. Advances in in-Cabin systems for management of long trains. Paper presented at: The 8th international heavy haul association conference (IHHA2007); 2007 Jun 11–13; Kiruna, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Wu Q, Cole C. Computing schemes for longitudinal train dynamics: sequential, parallel and hybrid. J Comp Nonlinear Dyn. 2015;10(6):064502-1–064502-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negrut D, Serban R, Mazhar H, et al. Parallel computing in multibody system dynamics: why, when and how. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn. 2014;9(4):041007-1–041007-12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiryagin M, Wolfs P, Szanto F, et al. Simplified and advanced modelling of traction control systems of heavy-haul locomotives. Veh Syst Dyn. 2015;53(5):672–691. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2015.1008016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Railroad Administration. Safe placement of train cars: a report. Washington DC; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Cole C, Spiryagin M, Sun Y, et al. A study of starting dynamics in heavy haul trains. Paper presented at: 23rd international symposium on dynamics of vehicles on roads and tracks (IAVSD 2013); 2013 August 19–23; Chengdu, China.
   Google Scholar
• Wu Q, Cole C, Spiryagin M. Methodology for optimisation of draft gear design using Particle Swarm Optimisation. Paper presented at: 24th international symposium on dynamics of vehicles on roads and tracks (IAVSD 2015); 2015 August 17–21; Graz, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Wei W, Zhao X, Zhang J, et al. Simulation research on effect of air brake system on longitudinal impulse of heavy haul train. Paper presented at: The international heavy haul conference (IHHA 2015); 2015 June 21–24; Perth, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Transportation Safety Board of Canada. Rail investigation reports [cited 2016 May 15]. Available from: http://www.tsb.gc.ca/eng/rapports-reports/rail/index.asp
   Google Scholar
• TTCI. Transportation Technology Center, Inc. TOES 4.0 Manual. 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Chen D. Identification of drag resistance of derailing cars in train dynamics modelling. Paper presented at: The international heavy haul conference (IHHA 2015); 2015 June 21–24; Perth, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Spiryagin M, Wolfs P, Szanto F, et al. Application of flywheel energy storage for heavy haul locomotives. Appl Energy. 2015;157:607–618. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.02.082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti R, Galardi E, Meli E, et al. Energy and wear optimisation of train longitudinal dynamics and of traction and braking systems. Veh Syst Dyn. 2015;53(5):651–671. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2014.990466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Cole C, Spiryagin M, et al. Longitudinal heavy haul train simulations and energy analysis for typical Australian track routes. J Rail Rapid Transit. 2014;228(4):355–366. doi: 10.1177/0954409713476225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClanachan M, Cole C. Current train control optimization methods with a view for application in heavy haul railways. J Rail Rapid Transit. 2011;226(1):36–47. doi: 10.1177/0954409711406352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Cole C, Spiryagin M, et al. Conceptual designs of hybrid locomotives for application as heavy haul trains on typical track lines. J Rail Rapid Transit. 2013;227(5):439–452. doi: 10.1177/0954409713501655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen D, Spiryagin M, Sun Y, et al. Simulation of slow speed wagon dynamics and curve wear on balloon loops. Paper presented at: The international heavy haul conference (IHHA 2015); 2015 June 21–24; Perth, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Glascodine RT. Impact of railway vehicles in relation to buffer resistance. J Inst Loco Eng. 1936;26(130):209–249.
   Google Scholar
• Jin D, Chen G. Technical manual of lateral dynamics simulation program. Chegdu (China): Rail Vehicle Institute of Southwest Jiaotong University; 1989 ( Chinese).
   Google Scholar
• The 5AT Group. Steaming ahead with advanced technology. Locomotive and train resistance; [cited 2016 May 15]. Available from: http://5at.co.uk/index.php/definitions/terrms-and-definitions/resistance.html
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald BW, Kerr AJ, Thompson IR. Application of computer simulation to railroads. Paper presented at: 1978 heavy haul railways conference; 1978 Sep 18–22; Perth, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Yin SK. Theoretical manual and users’ guide: longitudinal-vertical train action model. St Louis (MO): Washington University; 1980. (Technical Report No.FRA/ORD-76/278).
   Google Scholar
• Horn H, Jaschinski A, Sedlmair S. Dynamic simulation of freight cars with nonlinear suspension and buffer models during curving. Veh Syst Dyn. 1988;17(s1):161–168. doi: 10.1080/00423118808969256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath K, Zobory I, Bekefi E. Longitudinal dynamics of a six-unit metro train-set. Paper presented at: the 2nd mini conference on vehicle system dynamics; 1990 Nov 12–15; Budapest, Hungary.
   Google Scholar
• Barbosa RS. Longitudinal train dynamics [Master thesis]. Sao Paulo (Brazil): State University of Campinas; 1993 (Portuguese).
   Google Scholar
• Oyan C. Dynamic simulation of Taipei EMU train. Veh Syst Dyn. 1998;30(2):143–167. doi: 10.1080/00423119808969441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durali M, Shadmehri B. Nonlinear analysis of train derailment in severe braking. J Dyn Syst Meas Control. 2003;125:48–53. doi: 10.1115/1.1541669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantone L. Traindy: the new Union Internationale Des Chemins de Fer software for freight train interoperability. J Rail Rapid Transit. 2011;225(1):57–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar