Publication Cover
Vehicle System Dynamics
International Journal of Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility
Volume 54, 2016 - Issue 12
1,227
Views
40
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Thermal buckling and post-buckling behaviour of continuous welded rail track

Pages 1785-1807 | Received 30 Dec 2015, Accepted 11 Sep 2016, Published online: 16 Oct 2016

References

  • Kish A, Samavedam G. Track buckling prevention: theory, safety concepts, and applications. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, Office of Research and Development; 2013. (Report No. DOT/FRA/ORD-13/16).
  • International Union of Railways (UIC). UIC CODE 720 R: laying and maintenance of CWR track. 2nd ed. Paris (France): International Union of Railways; 2005.
  • European Rail Research Institute, Committee D202. Improved knowledge of forces in CWR track (including switches). Report 3 – theory of CWR track stability. Utrecht (The Netherlands): European Rail Research Institute; 1995.
  • Esveld C. Modern railway track. 2nd ed. Delft (The Netherlands): MRT-Productions; 2001.
  • De Iorio A, Grasso M, Pucillo GP, et al. Transverse strength of railway tracks: part 1. Planning and experimental setup. Frattura Integrità Strutturale. 2014;30:478–485.
  • Sluz A, Kish A, Read D. Factors affecting neutral temperature changes. In: Proceedings of the AREMA 1999 Annual Conferences: Track & Structures; 1999 Sep 12–15; Chicago (IL).
  • Harrison HD, Cheng L, Wang D, et al. Monitoring the stress free temperature of a complex segment of track. In: Proceedings of the ASME Joint Rail Conference; 2012 Apr 17–19; Philadelphia (PA).
  • Kish A, Samavedam G, Wormley D. New track shift safety limits for high speed rail applications. In: Proceedings of World Congress on Railway Research; 2001 Nov 25–29; Cologne (Germany).
  • Kish A, Samavedam G. Risk analysis based CWR: track buckling safety evaluations. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovations in the Design & Assessment of Railway Track; 1999 Dec 2–3; Delft (The Netherlands): Delft University of Technology.
  • Kish A, Samavedam G, Jeong D. Influence of vehicle induced loads on the lateral stability of CWR track. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, Office of Research and Development; 1985. (Report No. DOT/FRA/ORD-85/03).
  • Sussmann T, Kish A, Trosino M. Investigation of the influence of track maintenance on the lateral resistance of concrete tie track. In: Proceedings of Transportation Research Board Conference; 2003 Jan; Washington (DC). Cambridge (MA): U.S. Department of Transportation, John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center; 2007.
  • European Rail Research Institute, Committee D202. Improved knowledge of forces in CWR track (including switches). Report 2 – Review of existing experimental work in behaviour of CWR track. Utrecht (The Netherlands): European Rail Research Institute; 1995.
  • Suárez B, Rodriguez P, Vázquez M, et al. Safety assessment of underground vehicles passing over highly resilient curved tracks in the presence of a broken rail. Veh Syst Dyn. 2012;50(1):59–78. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2011.563859
  • Gonzalez FJ, Suarez B, Paulin J, et al. Safety assessment of underground vehicles passing over highly resilient straight track in the presence of a broken rail. J Rail Rapid Transit. 2008;222(1):69–84. doi: 10.1243/09544097JRRT128
  • Zakeri JA. Statistical analysis of rail breakage and rail welding failures in Iranian railways. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Railway Engineering; 2005 Jun 29–30; London (UK): University of Westminster.
  • Zarembski AM, Palese JW. Managing risk on the railway infrastructure. In: Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Railway Research; 2006 Jun 4–8; Montreal (Canada).
  • Bijl F. Buckling force in gapless track calculated in a nonlinear manner. De Ingenieur. 1964;39:119–123.
  • Kerr AD. Analysis of thermal track buckling in the lateral plane. Acta Mech. 1978;30:17–50. doi: 10.1007/BF01177436
  • Kerr AD. An improved analysis for thermal track buckling. Int J Nonlinear Mech. 1980;15(2):99–114. doi: 10.1016/0020-7462(80)90004-9
  • Kerr AD. The stress and stability analyses of railroad tracks. J Appl Mech. 1974;41(4):841–848. doi: 10.1115/1.3423470
  • Kerr AD. Lateral buckling of railroad tracks due to constrained thermal expansions – a critical survey. In: Kerr AD, editor. Railroad track mechanics and technology. Proceedings of a Symposium Held at Princeton University; 1975 Apr 21–23; Princeton (NJ): Princeton University; 1978.
  • Kerr AD. On the stability of the railroad track in the vertical plane. Rail Int. 1974;2:131–142.
  • Kerr AD, El-Aini YM. Determination of admissible temperature increases to prevent vertical track buckling. J Appl Mech. 1978;45:565–573. doi: 10.1115/1.3424362
  • El-Aini YM. Effect of imperfections on vertical track buckling. J Eng Mech Div. 1978;104(6):1327–1340. New York (US-NY): American Society of Civil Engineers.
  • Donley MG, Kerr AD. Thermal buckling of curved railroad tracks. Int J Nonlinear Mech. 1987;22(3):175–192. doi: 10.1016/0020-7462(87)90001-1
  • Samavedam G. Buckling and post-buckling analysis of CWR in the lateral plane. Derby (UK): British Railways Board, R&D Division, Railway Technical Centre; 1979. (Technical Note TN-TS-34).
  • Samavedam G, Kish A, Jeong D. Parametric studies on lateral stability of welded rail track. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, Office of Research and Development; 1983. (Report No. DOT/FRA/ORD-83/07).
  • Samavedam G, Kish A, Purple A, et al. Parametric analysis and safety concepts of CWR track buckling. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, Office of Research and Development; 1993. (Report No. DOT/FRA/ORD-93/26).
  • Esveld C, Hengstum LA. Tack stability in tight curves. Rail Int. 1988;12:15–20.
  • El-Ghazaly HA, Sherbourne AN, Arbabi F. Strength and stability of railway tracks—II Deterministic, finite element stability analysis. Comput Struct. 1991;39(1–2):23–45. doi: 10.1016/0045-7949(91)90070-3
  • Grisson GT, Kerr AD. Analysis of lateral track buckling using new frame-type equations. Int J Mech Sci. 2006;48:21–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.09.006
  • Kerr AD, Zarembski AM. The response equations for a cross-tie track. Acta Mech. 1981;40:253–276. doi: 10.1007/BF01170435
  • Kerr AD, Accorsi ML. Generalization of the equations for frame-type structures; a variational approach. Acta Mech. 1985;56:55–73. doi: 10.1007/BF01306024
  • Kerr AD, Accorsi ML. Numerical validation of the new track equations for static problems. Int J Mech Sci. 1987;29(1):15–27. doi: 10.1016/0020-7403(87)90071-3
  • Jackson JE, Bauld NR, Ramesh MS, et al. A superelement for lateral track deformation. In: Applied Mechanics Rail Transportation Symposium – 1988; 1988 Nov 27–Dec 2; Chicago (IL).
  • Jackson JE, Bauld NR, Ramesh MS. A finite element model for the lateral strength of railroad track structures. In: Yagawa G, Atluri SN, editors. Computational mechanics ’86 theory and applications. New York: Springer Verlag; 1986. p. 299–304.
  • Kish A, Samavedam G, Jeong D. Analysis of thermal buckling tests on U.S. railroads. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration, Office of Research and Development; 1982. (Report No. FRA/ORD-82/45).
  • Lei X, Feng Q. Analysis of stability of continuously welded rail track with finite elements. Proc Institut Mech Eng, Part F: J RailRapid Transit. 2004;218(3):225–233. doi: 10.1243/0954409042389409
  • Lim NH, Sung IH. Thermal buckling behaviour of continuous welded rail track. Steel Struct. 2004;4:111–119.
  • Lim N-H, Park N-H, Kang Y-J. Stability of continuous welded rail track. Comput Struct. 2003;81:2219–2236. doi: 10.1016/S0045-7949(03)00287-6
  • Lim NH, Han SY, Han TH, et al. Parametric study on stability of continuous welded rail track – ballast resistance and track irregularity. Steel Struct. 2008;8:171–181.
  • Van MA. Stability of continuous welded rail track [dissertation]. Delft (The Netherland): Delft University of Technology; 1997.
  • European Rail Research Institute, Committee D202. Improved knowledge of forces in CWR track (including switches). Report 4 – Stability of continuous welded rail track. Utrecht (The Netherlands): European Rail Research Institute; 1997.
  • Turek J. Non-linear response of the track. Veh Syst Dyn. 1995;24:265–279. doi: 10.1080/00423119508969630
  • ABAQUS User’s Manual, Version 6.11-1. Providence (US-RI): Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp; 2012.
  • Moravèík M. Response of railway track on nonlinear discrete supports. Veh Syst Dyn. 1995;24:280–293. doi: 10.1080/00423119508969631
  • Grassie S. Models of railway track and vehicle/track interaction at high frequencies: results of benchmark test. Veh Syst Dyn. 1996;25:243–262. doi: 10.1080/00423119608969199
  • Bono G, Focacci C, Lanni S. La sovrastruttura ferroviaria [The railway superstructure]. Rome: CIFI Publisher; 1997.
  • Corvino L. Manuale del tecnico del binario [The railway technician handbook]. Vol. 7. Rome: CIFI Publisher; 1994.
  • European Rail Research Institute, Committee D202. Improved knowledge of forces in CWR track (including switches). Report DT 363/2 – Measurements of lateral resistance, longitudinal resistance and change of neutral rail temperature (NRT) for ballasted track, Volume 2. Determination of lateral and longitudinal ballast resistance of a railway track by experimental tests. Utrecht (The Netherlands): European Rail Research Institute; 1997.
  • van’t Zand J, Moraal J. Ballast resistance under three dimensional loading. Delft (The Netherland): Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Laboratory of Roads and Railways. (Report 7-97-103-4).
  • Bazant ZP, Cedolin L, editors. Stability of structures: elastic, inelastic, fracture and damage theories. Mineola (NY): Dover Publications; 2003.
  • Carpinteri A. Scienza delle costruzioni [Theory of construction]. Bologna (Italy): Pitagora Publisher; 1992.
  • De Iorio A, Grasso M, Penta F, et al. Transverse strength of railway tracks: part 2. Test system for ballast resistance in line measurement. Frattura Integrità Strutturale. 2014;30:578–592.
  • De Iorio A, Grasso M, Penta F, et al. Transverse strength of railway tracks: part 3. Multiple scenarios test field. Frattura Integrità Strutturale. 2014;30:593–601.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.