International benchmarking of longitudinal train dynamics simulators: results

References

• Shackleton P, Iwnicki S. Comparison of wheel–rail contact codes for railway vehicle simulation: an introduction to the Manchester Contact Benchmark and initial results. Veh Syst Dyn. 2008;46(1–2):129–149. doi: 10.1080/00423110701790749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwnicki S. Manchester benchmarks for rail vehicle simulation. Veh Syst Dyn. 1998;30(3–4):295–313. doi: 10.1080/00423119808969454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruni S, Ambrosio J, Carnicero A, et al. The results of the pantograph–catenary interaction benchmark. Veh Syst Dyn. 2015;53(3):412–435. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2014.953183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantone L. Traindy: the new Union Internationale Des Chemins de Fer software for freight train interoperability. J Rail Rapid Transit. 2011;225(1):57–70. doi: 10.1243/09544097JRRT347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klauser PE. Advances in the simulation of long train longitudinal dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn. 1988;17(s1):210–214. doi: 10.1080/00423118808969261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabana AA, Ding L, Aboubakr AK. Use of the non-inertial coordinates in the analysis of train longitudinal forces. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn. 2011;7(1): 011001/1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen DR, Booth GF, Vithani AR, et al. Train energy and dynamics simulator (TEDS) – a state-of-the-art longitudinal train dynamics simulator. Paper presented at: the ASME 2012 rail transportation division fall technical conference (RTDF2012); 2012 October 16–17; Omaha, NE.
   Google Scholar
• Oprea RA, Cruceanu C, Spiroiu MA. Alternative friction models for braking train dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn. 2013;51(3):460–480. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2012.744459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa RS. Longitudinal train dynamics [masters thesis]. Sao Paulo: State University of Campinas; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Zobory I, Bekefi E. On real-time simulation of the longitudinal dynamics of trains on a specified railway line. Periodica Polytechnica Ser Transp Eng. 1995;23(1):3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Myamlin SV, Naumenko NE, Nikitchenko AA. The construction of a mathematical model of friction polymer absorbing device. J Dnipropetrovsk National University of Railway Transport Named After Academician V Lazaryan. 2008;24(4):25–33.
   Google Scholar
• Cole C, Spiryagin M, Bosomworth C. Examining longitudinal train dynamics in ore car tipplers. Veh Syst Dyn. 2017;55(4):534–551. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2016.1263393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang C, Guo G, Wang J, et al. Study on longitudinal force simulation of heavy-haul train. Veh Syst Dyn. 2017;55(4):571–582. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2016.1269183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pogorelov D, Yazykov V, Lysikov N, et al. Train 3D: the technique for inclusion of three-dimensional models in longitudinal train dynamics and its application in derailment studies and train simulators. Veh Syst Dyn. 2017;55(4):583–600. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2016.1273532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei W, Hu Y, Wu Q, et al. An air brake model for longitudinal train dynamics studies. Veh Syst Dyn. 2017;55(4):517–533. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2016.1254261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutch Safety Board. Risk management for rail transport with hazardous goods. Technical report, March 10, 2015 [cited 2017 June 9]. Available from: https://www.onderzoeksraad.nl/uploads/phase-docs/1193/69d0a5cd458atreinbotsing-tilburg-nl-interactief.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Chollet H, Sébès M, Maupu J, et al. The VOCO multi-body software in the context of real-time simulation. Veh Syst Dyn. 2013;51(4):570–580. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2013.768771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheli F, Di Gialleonardo E, Melzi S. Freight trains dynamics: effect of payload and braking power distribution on coupling forces. Veh Syst Dyn. 2017;55(4):464–479. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2016.1246743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosso N, Zampieri N. Long train simulation using a multibody code. Veh Syst Dyn. 2017;55(4):552–570. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2016.1267373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Q, Luo S, Qu T, et al. Comparisons of draft gear damping mechanisms. Veh Syst Dyn. 2017;55(4):501–516. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2016.1252049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiryagin M, Wu Q, Cole C. International benchmarking of longitudinal train dynamics simulators: benchmarking questions. Veh Syst Dyn. 2017;55(4):450–463. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2016.1270457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Q, Spiryagin M, Cole C. Longitudinal train dynamics: an overview. Veh Syst Dyn. 2016;54(12):1688–1714. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2016.1228988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Q, Cole C, Luo S, et al. A review of dynamics modelling of friction draft gear. Veh Syst Dyn. 2014;52(6):733–758. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2014.894199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar