A data-driven dynamics simulation framework for railway vehicles

References

• Pereira MS. Structural crashworthiness of railway vehicles. Proceedings of the 7th World Congress of Rail Research; 2006 Jun 4–8; Montreal, Canada; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen K, Tyrell D, Perlman B. Impact tests of crash energy management passenger rail cars: analysis and structural measurements. ASME 2004 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition; American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2004 Nov 13–19; Anaheim, CA; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Tyrell D, Jacobsen K, Martinez E, et al. Train-to-train impact test of crash energy management passenger rail equipment: structural results. ASME 2006 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition; American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2006 Nov 5–10; Chicago, IL; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Severson KJ, Parent DP. Train-to-train impact test of crash energy management passenger rail equipment: occupant experiments. ASME 2006 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition; 2006 Nov 5–10; Chicago, IL; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Jaschinski A, Chollet H, Iwnicki S, et al. The application of roller rigs to railway vehicle dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn. 1999;31(5–6):345–392. doi: 10.1076/vesd.31.5.345.8360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allotta B, Pugi L, Malvezzi M, et al. A scaled roller test rig for high-speed vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn. 2010;48(S1):3–18. doi: 10.1080/00423111003663576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li R, Xu P, Peng Y, et al. Scaled tests and numerical simulations of rail vehicle collisions for various train sets. Proc Inst Mech Eng F: J Rail Rapid Transit. 2016;230(6):1590–1600. doi: 10.1177/0954409715605126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim MS, Hur HM, Park JH, et al. Performance measurements system of the scaled active steering railway vehicle using the telemetry systems. The 10th WSEAS International Conference on Signal Processing, Computational Geometry and Artificial Vision; 2010 Aug 20–22; Taipei, Taiwan; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Tyrell D, Severson K, Marquis BP, et al. Locomotive crashworthiness design modifications study. Proceedings of the 1999 ASME/IEEE Joint Railroad Conference; 1999 Apr 13–15; Dallas, TX; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Xie S, Liang X, Zhou H, et al. Crashworthiness optimisation of the front-end structure of the lead car of a high-speed train. Struct Multidiscipl Optim. 2016;53(2):339–347. doi: 10.1007/s00158-015-1332-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen KM. Collision dynamics modeling of crash energy management passenger rail equipment. Dissert Theses – Gradworks. 2008;36(6):577–580.
   Google Scholar
• Scholes A, Lewis JH. Development of crashworthiness for railway vehicle structures. Proc Inst Mech Eng F: J Rail Rapid Transit. 1993;207(16):1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Cho HJ, Koo JS. A numerical study of the derailment caused by collision of a rail vehicle using a virtual testing model. Veh Syst Dyn. 2012;50(50):79–108. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2011.563860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen B, Yang H, Zhao W. Simulation study of high speed EMUs crash. J Dalian Jiaotong Univ. 2011;32(1):11–16.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao X. 3D transient finite element model for high-speed wheel–rail rolling contact and its application. J Mech Eng. 2013;49(18):1–7. doi: 10.3901/JME.2013.18.001
   Google Scholar
• Bian J, Gu Y, Murray MH. A dynamic wheel–rail impact analysis of railway track under wheel flat by finite element analysis. Veh Syst Dyn. 2013;51(6):784–797. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2013.774031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afazov S, Denmark W, Yaghi A. Modelling aspects of the design of railway vehicle structures and their crashworthiness. Proc Inst Mech Eng F: J Rail Rapid Transit. 2015: 0954409715605141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue X, Robinson M, Schmid F, et al. Rail vehicle impact analysis: a critique of the suitability of the rigid wall model and the assumption of symmetrical behaviour. Proc Inst Mech Eng F: J Rail Rapid Transit. 2015;229(2):173–185. doi: 10.1177/0954409713504393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montalbán L, Real J, Real T. Mechanical characterization of railway structures based on vertical stiffness analysis and railway substructure stress state. Proc Inst Mech Eng F: J Rail Rapid Transit. 2013;227(1):74–85. doi: 10.1177/0954409712452348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim HK. Design optimization of vehicle structures for crashworthiness improvement. Montreal: Concordia University; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Wang H-P, Botkin ME, Wu CT, et al. Coupled finite element/meshfree simulation of manufacturing problems. ASME 2003 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference; American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2003 Jul 20–24; Cleveland, OH; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Ni C, He Q. Review of railway multibody dynamics systems. China Acad Railw Sci. 1996(4):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Cao H, Zhang W, Miao B. The vertical vibration and suspension parameters design of flexible car body for high-speed railway vehicles. Mech Sci Technol Aerosp Eng. 2015;34(5):775–779.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng J, Wu P. Stability of high speed train. J Traffic Transp Eng. 2005;5(2):1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Yang G, Wei Y, Zhao G, et al. Current research progress in the mechanics of high speed rails. Adv Mech. 2015;45:201507.
   Google Scholar
• Diana G, Cheli F, Collina A, et al. The development of a numerical model for railway vehicles comfort assessment through comparison with experimental measurements. Veh Syst Dyn. 2002;38(3):165–183. doi: 10.1076/vesd.38.3.165.8287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun J, Ren L, Wang W. 3D dynamics model and simulation of train crash based on Adams. Comput Aided Eng. 2013;22(4):51–56.
   Google Scholar
• Miao B, Xiao S, Jin D. Research on modeling and analysis of a complex multibody system by using Simpack. Mech Sci Technol. 2006;25(7):813–816.
   Google Scholar
• Shen G, Zhou J, Ren L. Study on modeling method for train dynamics. J Tongji Univ (Nat Sci.). 2004;24(11):1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Tang Z, Liu FJ, Guo SH, et al. Evaluation of coupled finite element/meshfree method for a robust full-scale crashworthiness simulation of railway vehicles. Adv Mech Eng. 2016;8(4): 168781401664295. doi: 10.1177/1687814016642954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias J, Pereira M. Optimization methods for crashworthiness design using multibody models. Comput Struct. 2004;82(17):1371–1380. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.03.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dias JP, Pereira MS. Analysis and design for train crashworthiness using multibody models. Veh Syst Dyn. 2004;40:107–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taheri M, Ahmadian M. Machine learning from computer simulations with applications in rail vehicle dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn. 2016;54(5):653–666. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2016.1150497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsberg J, Nilsson L. On polynomial response surfaces and Kriging for use in structural optimization of crashworthiness. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2005;29(3):232–243. doi: 10.1007/s00158-004-0487-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsberg J, Nilsson L. Evaluation of response surface methodologies used in crashworthiness optimization. Int J Impact Eng. 2006;32(5):759–777. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie S, Tian H. Optimization research on the energy absorbing bearing structure of railway vehicle. China Railway Sci. 2012(6):60–68.
   Google Scholar
• Xie S, Zhou H. Optimization on passenger compartment structure of railway vehicle based on Kriging method. J Central South Univ (Sci Technol). 2012;43(5):1190–1198.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson ME, Moore LM, Ylvisaker D. Minimax and maximin distance designs. J Stat Plan Inf. 1990;26(2):131–148. doi: 10.1016/0378-3758(90)90122-B
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph VR, Hung Y. Orthogonal-maximin Latin hypercube designs. Stat Sin. 2008;18:171–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris MD, Mitchell TJ. Exploratory designs for computational experiments. J Stat Plann Inference. 1995;43(3):381–402. doi: 10.1016/0378-3758(94)00035-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chipperfield A, Fleming P, Pohlheim H. A genetic algorithm toolbox for MATLAB. Proceedings of the International Conference on Systems Engineering; 1994 Sept 6–8; Coventry, UK; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Dougall J. The product of two legendre polynomials. Proc Glasg Math Assoc. 1953;1(3):121–182. doi: 10.1017/S2040618500035590
   Google Scholar
• Narula SC. Orthogonal polynomial regression. Int Stat Rev. 1979;47(1):31–36. doi: 10.2307/1403204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright JW, Dawkins GS. Communication. Some aspects of curve fitting using orthogonal polynomials. Ind Eng Chem Fundam. 1965;4(1):93–97. doi: 10.1021/i160013a017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop CM. Pattern recognition and machine learning (information science and statistics). New York: Springer-Verlag Inc.; 2006: 049901.
   Google Scholar
• Louppe G. Understanding random forests. Belgium: University of Liège; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Garg VK, Dukkipati RV. Dynamics of railway vehicle systems. Canada: Academic Press; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Tang Z, Zhu Y, Nie Y, et al. Data-driven train set crash dynamics simulation. Veh Syst Dyn. 2017;55(2):149–167. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2016.1249377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar