Connected and automated road vehicles: state of the art and future challenges

References

• Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving systems. SAE International; 2016. (SAE J3016_201609).
   Google Scholar
• Dedicated short range communications (DSRC) message set dictionary set. SAE International; 2016. (SAE J2735SET_201603).
   Google Scholar
• 3GPP release 15. 3rd Generation partnership project; 2018. Available from: https://www.3gpp.org/release-15
   Google Scholar
• Campbell M, Egerstedt M, How J, et al. Autonomous driving in urban environments: approaches, lessons and challenges. Philos Trans R Soc A. 2010;368(1928):4649–4672. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Brummelen J, O'Brien M, Gruyer D, et al. Autonomous vehicle perception: the technology of today and tomorrow. Transp Res Part C. 2018;89:384–406. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orosz G, Ge JI, He CR, et al. Seeing beyond the line of sight – controlling connected automated vehicles. ASME Mech Eng Mag. 2017;139(12):S8–S12. doi: 10.1115/1.2017-Dec-8
   Google Scholar
• Popp K, Schiehlen W. Ground vehicle dynamics. Berlin: Springer; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Schramm D, Hiller M, Bardini R. Ground vehicle dynamics. Berlin: Springer; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Rajamani R. Vehicle dynamics and control. New York (NY): Springer; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ulsoy AG, Peng H, Cakmakci M. Automotive control systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Bloch A. Nonholonomic mechanics and control. New York (NY): Springer; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Sapio VD. Advanced analytical dynamics: theory and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Várszegi B, Takács D, Orosz G. On the nonlinear dynamics of automated vehicles – a nonholonomic approach. Eur J Mech A. 2019;74:371–380. doi: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2018.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oda K, Takeuchi H, Tsujii M, et al. Practical estimator for self-tuning automotive cruise control. 1991 American Control Conference; Boston (MA). IEEE; 1991. p. 2066–2071.
   Google Scholar
• Vahidi A, Stefanopoulou A, Peng H. Recursive least squares with forgetting for online estimation of vehicle mass and road grade: theory and experiments. Veh Syst Dyn. 2005;43(1):31–55. doi: 10.1080/00423110412331290446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fathy HK, Kang D, Stein JL. Online vehicle mass estimation using recursive least squares and supervisory data extraction. 2008 American Control Conference; Seattle (WA). IEEE; 2008. p. 1842–1848.
   Google Scholar
• Ploeg J, Shukla DPvan de Wouw N, et al. Controller synthesis for string stability of vehicle platoons. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2014;15(2):854–865. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2013.2291493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson P, Hussien O, Balkan A. Correct-by-construction adaptive cruise control: two approaches. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2016;24(4):1294–1307. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2015.2501351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu S, Peng H. Design, analysis, and experiments of preview path tracking control for autonomous vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2020;21(1):48–58. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2019.2892926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guldner J, Tan HS, Patwardhan S. Analysis of automatic steering control for highway vehicles with look-down lateral reference systems. Veh Syst Dyn. 1996;26(4):243–269. doi: 10.1080/00423119608969311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossetter EJ, Gerdes JC. Lyapunov based performance guarantees for the potential field lane-keeping assistance system. J Dyn Syst Meas Control. 2006;128(3):510–522. doi: 10.1115/1.2192835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talvala KL, Gerdes JC. Lanekeeping at the limits of handling: stability via lyapunov functions and a comparison with stability control. ASME 2008 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference; Ann Arbor (MI). American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2008. p. 361–368.
   Google Scholar
• Son YS, Kim W, Lee SH, et al. Robust multirate control scheme with predictive virtual lanes for lane-keeping system of autonomous highway driving. IEEE Trans Veh Technol. 2014;64(8):3378–3391. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2014.2356204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai S, Koutsoukos X. Safety analysis of automotive control systems using multi-modal port-hamiltonian systems. 19th International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control; Vienna, Austria. ACM; 2016. p. 105–114.
   Google Scholar
• Xu X, Grizzle JW, Tabuada P, et al. Correctness guarantees for the composition of lane keeping and adaptive cruise control. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng. 2017;15(3):1216–1229. doi: 10.1109/TASE.2017.2760863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González D, Pérez J, Milanés V, et al. A review of motion planning techniques for automated vehicles. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2015;17(4):1135–1145. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2015.2498841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paden B, Čáp M, Yong SZ, et al. A survey of motion planning and control techniques for self-driving urban vehicles. IEEE Trans Intel Veh. 2016;1(1):33–55. doi: 10.1109/TIV.2016.2578706
   Google Scholar
• Kuwata Y, Teo J, Fiore G, et al. Real-time motion planning with applications to autonomous urban driving. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2009;17(5):1105–1118. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2008.2012116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaman S, Walter MR, Perez A, et al. Anytime motion planning using the RRT. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; Shanghai, China. IEEE; 2011. p. 1478–1483.
   Google Scholar
• Howard TM, Green CJ, Kelly A, et al. State space sampling of feasible motions for high-performance mobile robot navigation in complex environments. J Field Rob. 2008;25(6–7):325–345. doi: 10.1002/rob.20244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton M, Urmson C, Dolan JM, et al. Motion planning for autonomous driving with a conformal spatiotemporal lattice. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; Shanghai, China. IEEE; 2011. p. 4889–4895.
   Google Scholar
• Gu T, Snider J, Dolan JM, et al. Focused trajectory planning for autonomous on-road driving. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV); Gold Coast, Australia. IEEE; 2013. p. 547–552.
   Google Scholar
• Berntorp K, Weiss A, Danielson C, et al. Automated driving: safe motion planning using positively invariant sets. 20th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems; Yokohama, Japan. IEEE; 2017. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Kogan D, Murray RM. Optimization-based navigation for the DARPA grand challenge. 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control; San Diego (CA). IEEE; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Gu T, Dolan JM. On-road motion planning for autonomous vehicles. International Conference on Intelligent Robotics and Applications; Montreal, Canada. Springer; 2012. p. 588–597.
   Google Scholar
• Shia VA, Gao Y, Vasudevan R, et al. Semiautonomous vehicular control using driver modeling. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2014;15(6):2696–2709. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2014.2325776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Jayakumar P, Stein JL, et al. Combined speed and steering control in high speed autonomous ground vehicles for obstacle avoidance using model predictive control. IEEE Trans Veh Technol. 2017;66(10):8746–8763. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2017.2707076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Febbo H, Liu J, Jayakumar P, et al. Moving obstacle avoidance for large, high-speed autonomous ground vehicles. American Control Conference; Seattle (WA). IEEE; 2017. p. 5568–5573.
   Google Scholar
• Wurts J, Stein JL, Ersal T. Minimum slip collision imminent steering in curved roads using nonlinear model predictive control. American Control Conference; Philadelphia (PA). IEEE; 2019. p. 3975–3980.
   Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Lin T, Borrelli F, et al. Predictive control of autonomous ground vehicles with obstacle avoidance on slippery roads. ASME 2010 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference; Cambridge (MA). American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2010. p. 265–272.
   Google Scholar
• Falcone P, Borrelli F, Asgari J, et al. Predictive active steering control for autonomous vehicle systems. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2007;15(3):566–580. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2007.894653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falcone P, Eric Tseng H, Borrelli F, et al. MPC-based yaw and lateral stabilisation via active front steering and braking. Veh Syst Dyn. 2008;46(S1):611–628. doi: 10.1080/00423110802018297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beal CE, Gerdes JC. Model predictive control for vehicle stabilization at the limits of handling. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2012;21(4):1258–1269. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2012.2200826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Althoff M, Dolan JM. Online verification of automated road vehicles using reachability analysis. IEEE Trans Rob. 2014;30(4):903–918. doi: 10.1109/TRO.2014.2312453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pek C, Zahn P, Althoff M. Verifying the safety of lane change maneuvers of self-driving vehicles based on formalized traffic rules. 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV); Los Angeles (CA). IEEE; 2017. p. 1477–1483.
   Google Scholar
• Liniger A, Lygeros J. Real-time control for autonomous racing based on viability theory. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2017;27(2):464–478. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2017.2772903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ames AD, Grizzle JW, Tabuada P. Control barrier function based quadratic programs with application to adaptive cruise control. 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control; Los Angeles (CA). IEEE; 2014. p. 6271–6278.
   Google Scholar
• Ames AD, Xu X, Grizzle JW, et al. Control barrier function based quadratic programs for safety critical systems. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 2017;62(8):3861–3876. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2016.2638961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He CR, Orosz G. Safety guaranteed connected cruise control. 21st IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems; Maui (HI). IEEE; 2018. p. 549–554.
   Google Scholar
• Kousik S, Vaskov S, Johnson-Roberson M, et al. Safe trajectory synthesis for autonomous driving in unforeseen environments. Dynamic Systems and Control Conference; Tysons (VA). ASME; 2017. p. V001T44A005–V001T44A005.
   Google Scholar
• Kousik S, Vaskov S, Bu F, et al. Bridging the gap between safety and real-time performance in receding-horizon trajectory design for mobile robots. arXiv preprint arXiv:180906746. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Vaskov S, Sharma U, Kousik S, et al. Guaranteed safe reachability-based trajectory design for a high-fidelity model of an autonomous passenger vehicle. American Conference on Control; Philadelphia (PA). IEEE; 2019. p. 705–710.
   Google Scholar
• Vaskov S, Kousik S, Larson H, et al. Towards provably not-at-fault control of autonomous robots in arbitrary dynamic environments. Robotics: Science and Systems; 2019. arXiv:1902.02851.
   Google Scholar
• Ozay N, Tabuada P. Guest editorial: special issue on formal methods in control. Discrete Event Dyn Syst. 2017;27(2):205–208. doi: 10.1007/s10626-017-0246-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou G, Sahin YE, Yang L, et al. Using control synthesis to generate corner cases: a case study on autonomous driving. IEEE Trans Comput Aided Des Integr Circuits Syst. 2018;37(11):2906–2917. doi: 10.1109/TCAD.2018.2858464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annpureddy Y, Liu C, Fainekos G, et al. S-taliro: a tool for temporal logic falsification for hybrid systems. International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems; Saarbrücken, Germany. Springer; 2011. p. 254–257.
   Google Scholar
• Cavada R, Cimatti A, Dorigatti M, et al. The nuXmv symbolic model checker. International Conference on Computer Aided Verification; Vienna, Austria. Springer; 2014. p. 334–342.
   Google Scholar
• Donzé A. Breach, a toolbox for verification and parameter synthesis of hybrid systems. International Conference on Computer Aided Verification; Edinburgh. Springer; 2010. p. 167–170.
   Google Scholar
• Rungger M, Zamani M. SCOTS: a tool for the synthesis of symbolic controllers. 19th International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control; Vienna, Austria. ACM; 2016. p. 99–104.
   Google Scholar
• Filippidis I, Dathathri S, Livingston SC, et al. Control design for hybrid systems with TuLiP: the temporal logic planning toolbox. IEEE Conference on Control Applications; Buenos Aires, Argentina. IEEE; 2016. p. 1030–1041.
   Google Scholar
• Smith SW, Nilsson P, Ozay N. Interdependence quantification for compositional control synthesis with an application in vehicle safety systems. 55th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control; Las Vegas (NV). IEEE; 2016. p. 5700–5707.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson P, Ozay N. Provably-correct compositional synthesis of vehicle safety systems. Safe, Autonomous and Intelligent Vehicles; Cham, Switzerland. Springer; 2019. p. 97–122.
   Google Scholar
• Mazo M, Davitian A, Tabuada P. Pessoa: a tool for embedded controller synthesis. International Conference on Computer Aided Verification; Edinburgh. Springer; 2010. p. 566–569.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchini F. Set invariance in control. Automatica. 1999;35(11):1747–1767. doi: 10.1016/S0005-1098(99)00113-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin X, Deshmukh JV, Kapinski J, et al. Powertrain control verification benchmark. 17th International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control; Berlin, Germany. ACM; 2014. p. 253–262.
   Google Scholar
• Yang L, Karnik A, Pence B, et al. Fuel cell thermal management: modeling, specifications and correct-by-construction control synthesis. American Control Conference; Seattle (WA). IEEE; 2017. p. 1839–1846.
   Google Scholar
• Seshia SA, Sadigh D, Sastry SS. Formal methods for semi-autonomous driving. 52nd ACM/EDAC/IEEE Design Automation Conference; San Francisco (CA). IEEE; 2015. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Sadigh D, Sastry SS, Seshia SA. Verifying robustness of human-aware autonomous cars. 2nd IFAC Conference on Cyber-Physical and Human Systems; Miami (FL). IEEE; 2019. Vol. 51, p. 131–138.
   Google Scholar
• Coogan S, Gol EA, Arcak M, et al. Traffic network control from temporal logic specifications. IEEE Trans Control Netw Syst. 2016;3(2):162–172. doi: 10.1109/TCNS.2015.2428471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coogan S, Arcak M, Belta C. Formal methods for control of traffic flow: automated control synthesis from finite-state transition models. IEEE Control Syst Mag. 2017;37(2):109–128. doi: 10.1109/MCS.2016.2643259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuncali CE, Fainekos G, Ito H, et al. Simulation-based adversarial test generation for autonomous vehicles with machine learning components. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium; Changshu, China. IEEE; 2018. p. 1555–1562.
   Google Scholar
• Cook JA, Kolmanovsky IV, McNamara D, et al. Control, computing and communications: technologies for the twenty-first century model T. Proc IEEE. 2007;95(2):334–355. doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2006.888384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahidi A, Sciarretta A. Energy saving potentials of connected and automated vehicles. Transp Res Part C. 2018;95:822–843. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahidi A, Sciarretta A. Energy-efficient driving of road vehicles: toward cooperative, connected, and automated mobility. Cham: Springer; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Guanetti J, Kim Y, Borrelli F. Control of connected and automated vehicles: state of the art and future challenges. Annu Rev Control. 2018;45:18–40. doi: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2018.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson L, Nielsen L. Modeling and control of engines and drivelines. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Xu S, Li SE, Zhang X, et al. Fuel-optimal cruising strategy for road vehicles with step-gear mechanical transmission. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2015;16(6):3496–3507. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2015.2459722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shieh SY, Ersal T, Peng H. Pulse-and-glide operation for parallel hybrid electric vehicles with step-gear transmission in automated car-following scenario with ride comfort consideration. American Control Conference; Philadelphia (PA). IEEE; 2019. p. 959–964.
   Google Scholar
• He CR, Maurer H, Orosz G. Fuel consumption optimization of heavy-duty vehicles with grade, wind, and traffic information. ASME J Comput Nonlinear Dyn. 2016;11(6):061011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsargyri GE, Kolmanovsky I, Michelini J, et al. Path dependent receding horizon control policies for hybrid electric vehicles. 18th IEEE International Conference on Control Applications; Saint Petersburg, Russia. IEEE; 2009. p. 607–612.
   Google Scholar
• Szwabowski SJ, MacNeille P, Kolmanovsky IV, et al. In-vehicle ambient condition sensing based on wireless internet access. SAE; 2010. (SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-0461).
   Google Scholar
• Cho D, Gupta R, Dai E, et al. Launch performance optimization of gtdi-dct powertrain. SAE Int J Engines. 2015;8(3):1398–1407. doi: 10.4271/2015-01-1111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park H, Gupta R, Dai E, et al. Quantifying performance of a connected vehicle by optimal oontrol. 4th IFAC Workshop Engine Powertrain Control, Simul Model. 2015;48(15):328–334.
   Google Scholar
• Schoeggl P, Ramschak E. Vehicle driveability assessment using neural networks for development, calibration and quality tests. SAE; 2000. (SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-0702).
   Google Scholar
• He CR, Qin WB, Ozay N, et al. Optimal gear shift schedule design for automated vehicles: hybrid system based analytical approach. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2018;26(6):2078–2090. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2017.2747506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taheri E, Gusikhin O, Kolmanovsky I. Failure prognostics for in-tank fuel pumps of the returnless fuel systems. ASME 2016 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference; Minneapolis (MN). IEEE; 2016. p. V001T12A002–V001T12A002.
   Google Scholar
• Breschi V, Kolmanovsky I, Bemporad A. Cloud-aided collaborative estimation by admm-rls algorithms for connected diagnostics and prognostics. American Control Conference; Milwaukee (WI). IEEE; 2018. p. 2727–2732.
   Google Scholar
• Amini MR, Gong X, Feng Y, et al. Sequential eco-optimization of speed, thermal load, and power split in connected HEVs. American Control Conference; Philadelphia (PA). IEEE; 2019. p. 4614–4620.
   Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Salvi A, Stefanopoulou A, et al. Reducing soot emissions in a diesel series hybrid electric vehicle using a power rate constraint map. IEEE Trans Veh Technol. 2015;64(1):2–12. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2014.2321346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ersal T, Brudnak M, Salvi A, et al. Development and model-based transparency analysis of an internet-distributed hardware-in-the-loop simulation platform. Mechatronics. 2011;21(1):22–29. doi: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2010.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson A, Nyberg P, Sehammar H, et al. Vehicle powertrain test bench co-simulation with a moving base simulator using a pedal robot. SAE Int J Passenger Cars – Electron Electr Syst. 2013;6(1):169–179. doi: 10.4271/2013-01-0410
   Google Scholar
• Kim Y, Salvi A, Siegel JB, et al. Hardware-in-the-loop validation of a power management strategy for hybrid powertrains. Control Eng Pract. 2014;29:277–286.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Lu S, Yang Y, et al. Internet-distributed vehicle-in-the-loop simulation for hevs. IEEE Trans Veh Technol. 2018;67(5):3729–3739. doi: 10.1109/TVT.2018.2803088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ersal T, Gillespie RB, Brudnak M, et al. Effect of coupling point selection on distortion in internet-distributed hardware-in-the-loop simulation. Int J Veh Des. 2013;61(1–4):67–85. doi: 10.1504/IJVD.2013.050840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ersal T, Brudnak MJ, Salvi A, et al. An iterative learning control approach to improving fidelity in internet-distributed hardware-in-the-loop simulation. J Dyn Syst Meas Control. 2014;136(6):061012–1–061012–8. doi: 10.1115/1.4027868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Y, Brudnak MJ, Jayakumar P, et al. A predictor based framework for delay compensation in networked closed-loop systems. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron. 2018;23(5):2482–2493. doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2018.2864722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molnár TG, Qin WB, Insperger T, et al. Application of predictor feedback to compensate time delays in connected cruise control. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2018;19(2):545–559. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2017.2754240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ploeg J, Van De Wouw N, Nijmeijer H. Lp string stability of cascaded systems: application to vehicle platooning. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2014;22(2):786–793. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2013.2258346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng S, Zhang Y, Li SE, et al. String stability for vehicular platoon control: definitions and analysis methods. Annu Rev Control. 2019;47:81–97. doi: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2019.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunter G, Gloudemans D, Stern RE, et al. Are commercially implemented adaptive cruisecontrol systems string stable? 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems; 2019. arXiv:1905.02108v1.
   Google Scholar
• Besselink B, Johansson KH. String stability and a delay-based spacing policy for vehicle platoons subject to disturbances. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 2017;62(9):4376–4391. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2017.2682421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis LC. Effect of adaptive cruise control systems on traffic flow. Phys Rev E. 2004;69(6):066110. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.066110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern RE, Cui S, Delle Monache ML, et al. Dissipation of stop-and-go waves via control of autonomous vehicles: field experiments. Transp Res Part C. 2018;89:205–221. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin WB, Orosz G. Experimental validation of string stability for connected vehicles subject to information delay. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol; 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2019.2900609
   Google Scholar
• Ge JI, Orosz G. Dynamics of connected vehicle systems with delayed acceleration feedback. Transp Res Part C. 2014;46:46–64. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2014.04.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orosz G. Connected cruise control: modelling, delay effects, and nonlinear behaviour. Veh Syst Dyn. 2016;54(8):1147–1176. doi: 10.1080/00423114.2016.1193209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ge JI, Avedisov SS, He CR, et al. Experimental validation of connected automated vehicle design among human-driven vehicles. Transp Res Part C. 2018;91:335–352. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Orosz G. Motif-based design for connected vehicle systems in presence of heterogeneous connectivity structures and time delays. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2016;17(6):1638–1651. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2015.2509782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin WB, Orosz G. Experimental validation on connected cruise control with flexible connectivity topologies. IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron. 2019;24(6):2791–2802. doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2019.2943501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milanes V, Shladover SE, Spring J, et al. Cooperative adaptive cruise control in real traffic situations. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2014;15(1):296–305. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2013.2278494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shladover SE, Nowakowski C, Lu XY, et al. Cooperative adaptive cruise control definitions and operating concepts. Transp Res Rec. 2015;2489:145–152. doi: 10.3141/2489-17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Y, Li SE, Wang J, et al. Stability and scalability of homogeneous vehicular platoon: study on the influence of information flow topologies. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2016;17(1):14–26. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2015.2402153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Y, Li SE, Li K, et al. Distributed model predictive control for heterogeneous vehicle platoons under unidirectional topologies. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2017;25(3):899–910. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2016.2594588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öncü S, Ploeg J, Van De Wouw N, et al. Cooperative adaptive cruise control: network-aware analysis of string stability. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2014;15(4):1527–1537. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2014.2302816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Nunen E, Reinders J, Semsar-Kazerooni E, et al. String stable model predictive cooperative adaptive cruise control for heterogeneous platoons. IEEE Trans Intell Veh. 2019;4(2):186–196. doi: 10.1109/TIV.2019.2904418
   Google Scholar
• Alam A, Besselink B, Turri V, et al. Heavy-duty vehicle platooning for sustainable freight transportation: a cooperative method to enhance safety and efficiency. IEEE Control Syst Mag. 2015;35(6):34–56. doi: 10.1109/MCS.2015.2471046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang M, Daamen W, Hoogendoorn SP, et al. Rolling horizon control framework for driver assistance systems. Part II: cooperative sensing and cooperative control. Transp Res Part C. 2014;40:290–311. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2013.11.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turri V, Besselink B, Johansson KH. Cooperative look-ahead control for fuel-efficient and safe heavy-duty vehicle platooning. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2016;25(1):12–28. doi: 10.1109/TCST.2016.2542044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rios-Torres J, Malikopoulos AA. A survey on the coordination of connected and automated vehicles at intersections and merging at highway on-ramps. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2017;18(5):1066–1077. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2016.2600504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malikopoulos AA, Cassandras CG, Zhang YJ. A decentralized energy-optimal control framework for connected automated vehicles at signal-free intersections. Automatica. 2018;93:244–256. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2018.03.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang M, Daamen W, Hoogendoorn SP, et al. Cooperative car-following control: distributed algorithm and impact on moving jam features. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2016;17(5):1459–1471. doi: 10.1109/TITS.2015.2505674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talebpour A, Mahmassani HS. Influence of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic flow stability and throughput. Transp Res Part C. 2016;71:143–163. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2016.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C, Bayen AM, Mehta A. Stabilizing traffic with autonomous vehicles. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; Brisbane, Australia. IEEE; 2018. p. 6012–6018.
   Google Scholar
• Avedisov SS, Bansal G, Orosz G. Impact of connected automated vehicles on traffic dynamics. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst. 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Masoud N, Jayakrishnan R. Autonomous or driver-less vehicles: implementation strategies and operational concerns. Transp Res Part E. 2017;108:179–194. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2017.10.011
   Google Scholar
• Lloret-Batlle R, Masoud N, Nam D. Peer-to-peer ridesharing with ride-back on high-occupancy-vehicle lanes: toward a practical alternative mode for daily commuting. Transp Res Rec. 2017;2668(1):21–28. doi: 10.3141/2668-03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regue R, Masoud N, Recker W. Car2work: a shared mobility concept to connect commuters with workplaces. Transp Res Record: J Transp Res Board. 2016;2542:102–110. doi: 10.3141/2542-12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamari J, Sjöklint M, Ukkonen A. The sharing economy: why people participate in collaborative consumption. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2016;67(9):2047–2059. doi: 10.1002/asi.23552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrichs H. Sharing economy: a potential new pathway to sustainability. GAIA-Ecol Perspect Sci Soc. 2013;22(4):228–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen B, Kietzmann J. Ride on! mobility business models for the sharing economy. Organ Environ. 2014;27(3):279–296. doi: 10.1177/1086026614546199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloret-Batlle R, Jayakrishnan R. Envy-minimizing pareto efficient intersection control with brokered utility exchanges under user heterogeneity. Transp Res Part B: Methodological. 2016;94:22–42. doi: 10.1016/j.trb.2016.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloret-Batlle R, Jayakrishnan R. Envy-free pricing for collaborative consumption of supply in transportation systems. Transp Res Procedia. 2017;23:772–789. doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.043
   Google Scholar
• Masoud N, Lloret-Batlle R, Jayakrishnan R. Using bilateral trading to increase ridership and user permanence in ridesharing systems. Transp Res Part E. 2017;102:60–77. doi: 10.1016/j.tre.2017.04.007
   Google Scholar
• Lloret-Batlle R, Jayakrishnan R. Study of a dynamic cooperative trading queue routing control scheme for freeways and facilities with parallel queues.97th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board; Washington (DC). SAGE Publishing; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Sun X, Yin Y. Behaviorally stable vehicle platooning for energy savings. Transp Res Part C. 2019;99:37–52. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik P, Jin WL, Lloret-Batlle R, et al. A unifiable multi-commodity kinematic wave model for traffic systems with tradable right-of-way. 98th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board; Washington (DC). SAGE Publishing; 2019.
   Google Scholar