Analytical model of the pantograph–catenary dynamic interaction and comparison with numerical simulations

References

• Kieling F, Puschmann R, Schmieder A, et al. Contact lines for electrical railways: planning, design, implementation, maintenance. 3rd ed. Erlangen: Publicis Publishing; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• EN 50318:2018. Railway applications. Current collection systems. Validation of simulation of the dynamic interaction between pantograph and overhead contact line. European Union Agency for Railways.
   Google Scholar
• Bruni S, Ambrosio J, Carnicero A, et al. The results of the pantograph-catenary interaction benchmark. Veh Syst Dyn. 2015;53(3):412–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aboshi M, Manabe K. Analyses of contact force fluctuation between catenary and pantograph. Q Rep Railw Tech Res Inst. 2000;41:182–187.
   Google Scholar
• Nåvik P, Rønnquist A, Stichel S. The use of dynamic response to evaluate and improve the optimization of existing soft railway catenary systems for higher speeds. Proc Inst Mechanical Eng, Part F: J Rail and Rapid Transit. 2016;230(4):1388–1396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pombo J, Ambrósio J. Influence of pantograph suspension characteristics on the contact quality with the catenary for high speed trains. Comput Struct. 2012;110:32–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu T, Brennan M. Basic analytical study of pantograph-catenary system dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn. 1998;30(6):443–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Zhou N, Li R, et al. Pantograph and catenary system with double pantographs for high-speed trains at 350 km/h or higher. J Mod Transp. 2011;19(1):7–11.
   Google Scholar
• Roy S, Chakraborty G, DasGupta A. Coupled dynamics of a viscoelastically supported infinite string and a number of discrete mechanical systems moving with uniform speed. J Sound Vib. 2018;415:184–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belotserkovskiy P. Forced oscillations and resonance of infinite periodic strings. J Sound Vib. 1997;204(1):41–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metrikine A, Bosch A. Dynamic response of a two-level catenary to a moving load. J Sound Vib. 2006;292(3):676–693.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, Liu Z, Duan F, et al. Wave propagation analysis in high-speed railway catenary system subjected to a moving pantograph. Appl Math Model. 2018;59:20–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aboshi M, Tsunemoto M. Installation guidelines for shinkansen high speed overhead contact lines. Q Rep Railw Tech Res Inst. 2011;52:230–236.
   Google Scholar
• Van OV, Massat J-P, Laurent C, et al. Introduction of variability into pantograph-catenary dynamic simulations. Veh Syst Dyn. 2014;52(10):1254–1269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregori S, Tur M, Taranc JE, et al. Stochastic monte carlo simulations of the pantograph-catenary dynamic interaction to allow for uncertainties introduced during catenary installation. Veh Syst Dyn. 2019;57(4):471–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van OV, Massat J-P, Balmes E. Waves, modes and properties with a major impact on dynamic pantograph-catenary interaction. J Sound Vib. 2017;402:51–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho YH, Lee K, Park Y, et al. Influence of contact wire pre-sag on the dynamics of pantograph-railway catenary. Int J Mech Sci. 2010;52(11):1471–1490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregori S, Tur M, Nadal E, et al. An approach to geometric optimisation of railway catenaries. Veh Syst Dyn. 2018;56(8):1162–1186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tur M, García E, Baeza L, et al. A 3D absolute nodal coordinate finite element model to compute the initial configuration of a railway catenary. Eng Struct. 2014;71:234–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregori S, Tur M, Nadal E, et al. Fast simulation of the pantograph-catenary dynamic interaction. Finite Elem Anal Des. 2017;129:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Jönsson P-A, Stichel S, et al. On the implementation of an auxiliary pantograph for speed increase on existing lines. Veh Syst Dyn. 2016;54(8):1077–1097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilber HM, Hughes TJR, Taylor RL. Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 1977;5(3):283–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasio D, Fasana A, Garibaldi L, et al. Analytical investigation of railway overhead contact wire dynamics and comparison with experimental results. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2019;116:277–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EN 50367. Railway applications: Current collection systems. Technical criteria for the interaction between pantograph and overhead line, European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization.
   Google Scholar