Derailment study of railway cargo vehicles using a response surface methodology

References

• Iwnicki S. Handbook of railway vehicle dynamics. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Magalhães H, Ambrósio J, Pombo J. Railway vehicle modelling for the vehicle-track interaction compatibility analysis. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part K J Multi-Body Dyn. 2016;230:251–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu H, Robeda J. Effects of bogie centre plate lubrication on vehicle curving and lateral stability. Veh Syst Dyn. 2004;41:292–301. doi: https://doi.org/10.1076/vesd.41.1.27.23407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwnicki SD, Stichel S, Orlova A, et al. Dynamics of railway freight vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn. 2015;53:995–1033. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2015.1037773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stichel S. Limit cycle behaviour and chaotic motions of two-axle freight wagons with friction damping. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2002;8:243–255. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020990128895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans J, Rogers PJ. Validation of dynamic simulations of rail vehicles with friction damped Y25 bogies. Veh Syst Dyn. 1998;29:219–233. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423119808969561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosso N, Gugliotta A, Soma A. Multibody simulation of a freight bogie with friction dampers. Jt. Rail. ASMEDC; 2002. p. 47–56.
   Google Scholar
• Molatefi H, Hecht M, Kadivar MH. Critical speed and limit cycles in the empty Y25-freight wagon. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2006;220:347–359. doi: https://doi.org/10.1243/09544097JRRT67
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karis T, Berg M, Stichel S, et al. Correlation of track irregularities and vehicle responses based on measured data. Veh Syst Dyn. 2018;56:967–981. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2017.1403634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recuero AM, Escalona JL. Dynamics of the coupled railway vehicle-flexible track system with irregularities using a multibody approach with moving modes. Veh Syst Dyn. 2014;52:45–67. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2013.857030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suarez B, Felez J, Antonio Lozano J, et al. Influence of the track quality and of the properties of the wheel-rail rolling contact on vehicle dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn. 2013;51:301–320. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2012.725853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magalhães H, Pombo J, Ambrósio J, et al. Rail vehicle design optimization for operation in a mountainous railway track. Innov Infrastruct Solut. 2017;2(31).
   Google Scholar
• Weidemann C. State-of-the-art railway vehicle design with multi-body simulation. J Mech Syst Transp Logist. 2010;3:12–26. doi: https://doi.org/10.1299/jmtl.3.12
   Google Scholar
• Bruni S, Meijaard JP, Rill G, et al. State-of-the-art and challenges of railway and road vehicle dynamics with multibody dynamics approaches. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2020;49:1–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-020-09735-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson N, Fries R, Witte M, et al. Assessment of safety against derailment using simulations and vehicle acceptance tests: a worldwide comparison of state-of-the-art assessment methods. Veh Syst Dyn. 2011;49:1113–1157. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2011.586706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brabie D, Andersson E. Dynamic simulation of derailments and its consequences. Veh Syst Dyn. 2006;44:652–662. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423110600882753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clementson J, Evans J. The use of dynamic simulation in the investigation of derailment incidents. Veh Syst Dyn. 2016;37:338–349. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2002.11666244
   Google Scholar
• Di Gialleonardo E, Premoli A, Gallazzi S, et al. Sloshing effects and running safety in railway freight vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn. 2013;51:1640–1654. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2013.814797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polach O, Böttcher A, Vannucci D, et al. Validation of simulation models in the context of railway vehicle acceptance. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2015;229:729–754. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409714554275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pombo J. Application of a computational tool to study the influence of worn wheels on railway vehicle dynamics. J Softw Eng Appl. 2012;05:51–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/jsea.2012.52009
   Google Scholar
• Facchinetti A, Mazzola L, Alfi S, et al. Mathematical modelling of the secondary airspring suspension in railway vehicles and its effect on safety and ride comfort. Veh Syst Dyn. 2010;48:429–449. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2010.486036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suarez B, Mera JM, Martinez ML, et al. Assessment of the influence of the elastic properties of rail vehicle suspensions on safety, ride quality and track fatigue. Veh Syst Dyn. 2013;51:280–300. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2012.725852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escalona JL, Aceituno JF, Urda P, et al. Railway multibody simulation with the knife-edge-equivalent wheel–rail constraint equations. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2020;48:373–402. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-019-09708-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magalhães H, Marques F, Liu B, et al. Implementation of a non-Hertzian contact model for railway dynamic application. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2020;48:41–78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-019-09688-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques F, Magalhães H, Pombo J, et al. A three-dimensional approach for contact detection between realistic wheel and rail surfaces for improved railway dynamic analysis. Mech Mach Theory. 2020;149. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2020.103825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques F, Magalhães H, Liu B, et al. On the generation of enhanced lookup tables for wheel-rail contact models. Wear. 2019: 434–435:202993. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2019.202993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti R, Meli E, Ridolfi A. A full-scale roller-rig for railway vehicles: multibody modelling and Hardware In the Loop architecture. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2016;37:69–93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-016-9507-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrósio J, Pombo J. A unified formulation for mechanical joints with and without clearances/bushings and/or stops in the framework of multibody systems. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2018;42:317–345. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-018-9613-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pombo J, Ambrósio J, Silva M. A new wheel-rail contact model for railway dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn. 2007;45:165–189. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423110600996017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antunes P, Magalhães H, Ambrósio J, et al. A co-simulation approach to the wheel–rail contact with flexible railway track. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2019;45:245–272. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-018-09646-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmati-Alaei A, Sharavi M, Samadian Zakaria M. Hunting stability analysis of partially filled tank wagon on curved track using coupled CFD-MBD method. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2020;50:45–69. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-019-09715-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo JS, Cho HJ. A method to predict the derailment of rolling stock due to collision using a theoretical wheelset derailment model. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2012;27:403–422. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-011-9270-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sunami H, Morimura T, Terumichi Y, et al. Model for analysis of bogie frame motion under derailment conditions based on full-scale running tests. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2012;27:321–349. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-011-9288-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao X, Jin X, Wen Z, et al. Effect of tangent track buckle on vehicle derailment. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2011;25:1–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11044-010-9210-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EN 14363:2016+A1:2018 Railway applications - Testing and Simulation for the acceptance of running characteristics of railway vehicles - Running Behaviour and stationary tests. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• UIC 518 Testing and approval of railway vehicles from the point of view of their dynamic behaviour - Safety - Track fatigue - Running behaviour. International Union of Railways (UIC), Paris; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery D. Design and analysis of experiments. 8th ed. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Myers R, Montgomery D, Anderson-Cook C. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. 4th ed. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Martowicz A, Kurowski P, Uhl T, et al. Design optimization of multibody model of rail vehicle supported by response surface method. Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Eng. Optim; Lisbon; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho M, Milho J, Ambrosio J, et al. Railway occupant passive safety improvement by optimal design. Int J Crashworthiness. 2017;22:624–634. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2016.1221332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho MS, Martins AP, Milho J. Railway seat design for injury mitigation in crash scenario. Int J Rail Transp. 2020;8:215–233. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23248378.2019.1636318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Chen S, Li X, et al. Optimal rail profile design for a curved segment of a heavy haul railway using a response surface approach. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2016;230:1496–1508. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0954409715602513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EN 16235:2013 Railway application - Testing for the acceptance of running characteristics of railway vehicles - Freight wagons - Conditions for dispensation of freight wagons with defined characteristics from on-track tests according to EN 14363. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Nadal J. Locomotives à Vapeur. Collect. Encycl. Sci. Bibliotéque Mécanique Appliquée Génie. Paris, France; 1908.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Dhanasekar M. Dynamics of railway wagons subjected to braking torques on defective tracks. Veh Syst Dyn. 2012;50:109–131. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2011.571265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar