Multi-objective optimal computer-aided engineering of hydraulic brake systems for electrified road vehicles

References

• Bilgin B, Magne P, Malysz P, et al. Making the case for electrified transportation. IEEE Trans Transp Electrification. 2015;1(1):4–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselma PG, Huo Y, Roeleveld J, et al. Integration of on-line control in optimal design of multimode power-split hybrid electric vehicle powertrains. IEEE Trans Veh Technol. 2019;68(4):3436–3445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselma PG, Huo Y, Roeleveld J, et al. Rapid optimal design of a multimode power split hybrid electric vehicle transmission. P I Mech Eng D-J Aut Eng. 2019;233(3):740–762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crolla DA, Cao D. "The impact of hybrid and electric powertrains on vehicle dynamics, control systems and energy regeneration”. Veh Syst Dyn. 2012;50(1):95–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauh J, Ammon D. System dynamics of electrified vehicles: some facts, thoughts, and challenges. Veh Syst Dyn. 2011;49(7):1005–1020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselma PG, Belingardi G. Next generation HEV powertrain design tools: roadmap and challenges. SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-2602, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Yu L, Pan N, et al. Cooperative control of regenerative braking and hydraulic braking of an electrified passenger car. P I Mech Eng D-J Aut Eng. 2012;226(10):1289–1302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junzhi Z, Yutong L, Chen L, et al. New regenerative braking control strategy for rear-driven electrified minivans. Energy Convers Manage. 2014;82:165–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv C, Zhang J, Li Y. Extended-Kalman-filter-based regenerative and friction blended braking control for electric vehicle equipped with axle motor considering damping and elastic properties of electric powertrain. Veh Syst Dyn. 2014;52(11):1372–1388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar CN, Subramanian SC. Cooperative control of regenerative braking and friction braking for a hybrid electric vehicle. P I Mech Eng D-J Aut Eng. 2015;230(1):103–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun F, Liu W, He H, et al. An integrated control strategy for the composite braking system of an electric vehicle with independently driven axles. Veh Syst Dyn. 2016;54(8):1031–1052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao ZG, Zhou LJ, Zhang JT, et al. Distributed and self-adaptive vehicle speed estimation in the composite braking case for four-wheel drive hybrid electric car. Veh Syst Dyn. 2017;55(5):750–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramaniyam KV, Subramanian SC. Impact of regenerative braking torque blend-out characteristics on electrified heavy road vehicle braking performance. Veh Syst Dyn. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00423114.2019.1677921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vignati M, Sabbioni E. Force-based braking control algorithm for vehicles with electric motors. Veh Syst Dyn. 2020;58(9):1348–1366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antanaitis D. Effect of regenerative braking on foundation brake performance. SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars – Mech. Syst. 2010;3(2):14–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hall T. A comparison of braking behavior between an IC engine and pure electric vehicle in Los Angeles city driving conditions. SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-2518; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Shenberger M, Antanaitis D. Brake system design for dedicated BEV architectures. SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-1870; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Anselma PG, Patil SP, Belingardi G. Rapid design of a light vehicle hydraulic brake system. 2017 2nd IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Engineering (ICITE), Singapore; 2017. p. 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Anselma PG, Patil SP, Belingardi G. Rapid optimal design of a light vehicle hydraulic brake system. SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-0831; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Lv C, Hu X, Sangiovanni-Vincentelli A, et al. Driving-style-based codesign optimization of an automated electric vehicle: a cyber-physical system approach. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2019;66(4):2965–2975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Alfio N, Morgando A, Sorniotti A. Electro-hydraulic brake systems: design and test through hardware-in-the-loop simulation. Veh Syst Dyn. 2006;44( sup.1):378–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohtani Y, Innami T, Obata T, et al. Development of an electrically-driven intelligent brake unit. SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-0572; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Goodarzi A, Mehrmashhadi J, Esmailzadeh E. Optimised braking force distribution strategies for straight and Curved braking. Int J Heavy Veh Syst. 2009;16(10):78–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mechanical simulation, “brake system with boost and thermal effects”, CarSim browser reference manual; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Heckmann A. A brake model with thermoelastic disc for the analysis of vehicle judder vibrations. Veh Syst Dyn. 2006;44(sup.1):360–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mule N, Pilane D, Mahale P, et al. FEA analysis and correlation of thermo-mechanical deformations of a disc brake rotor. SAE Technical Paper 2015-26-0206; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Heydari S, Fajri P, Sabzehgar R, et al. A novel approach for maximizing regenerative braking energy extraction of electric vehicles using motor performance lookup table. 2019 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo (ITEC), Detroit, MI, USA; 2019. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Emırler MT, Kahraman, K, Şentürk M, et al. Lateral stability control of fully electric vehicles. Int J Auto Tech. 2015;16(2):317–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselma PG, Belingardi G. Comparing battery electric vehicle powertrains through rapid component sizing. Int. J. Electric Hybrid Vehicles. 2019;11(1):36–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henning K-U, Sawodny O. Vehicle dynamics modelling and validation for online applications and controller synthesis. Mechatronics (Oxf). 2016;39:113–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacejka HB, Bakker E. The magic formula tyre model. Veh Syst Dyn. 1992;21(sup.1):1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Pacejka HB, Besselink IJM. Magic formula tyre model with transient properties. Veh Syst Dyn. 1997;27(sup.1):234–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Transportation - NHTSA, “Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 135; Light Vehicle Brake Systems,” Dec 2, 2005. [Online] [cited 2020 Jan 10]. Available from: https://www.nhtsa.gov/DOT/NHTSA/.../TP-135-01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Economic Commission for Europe, “Regulation No. 13-H - Uniform Provisions Concerning the Approval of Passenger Cars with Regard to Braking,” Feb. 24, 2014. [Online] [cited 2020 Jan 10]. Available from: https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2007/wp29/ECE-TRANS-WP29-2007-03e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nakazawa M, Isobe O, Takahashi S, et al. Braking force distribution control for improved vehicle dynamics and brake performance. Veh Syst Dyn. 1995;24(4-5):413–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsopoulos KE, Vrahatis MN. Recent approaches to global optimization problems through particle swarm optimization. Nat Comput. 2002;1(2-3):235–306.
   Google Scholar
• Dai P, Katupitiya J. Force control for path following of a 4WS4WD vehicle by the integration of PSO and SMC. Veh Syst Dyn. 2018;56(11):1682–1706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandimarte P. Optimization model solving. In An Introduction to Financial Markets: A Quantitative Approach. Chapter. 16:2018. p. 699–742.
   Google Scholar
• Denimal E, Nacivet S, Sinou JJ, et al. A strategy based on genetic algorithm to deal with influent internal contacts. 2018 FISITA Eurobrake, The Hague, Netherlands, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• He Y, McPhee J. Design optimization of rail vehicles with passive and active suspensions: a combined approach using genetic algorithms and multibody dynamics. Veh Syst Dyn. 2002;37(sup.1):397–408.
   Google Scholar
• Nouiri M, Bekrar A, Jemai A, et al. An effective and distributed particle swarm optimization algorithm for flexible job-shop scheduling problem. J Intell Manuf. 2018;29(3):603–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Precup R, Sabau M, Dragos C, et al. Particle swarm optimization of fuzzy models for anti-lock braking systems. 2014 IEEE Conference on Evolving and Adaptive Intelligent Systems (EAIS), Linz, Austria; 2014. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao W, Yang Z, Wang C. Multi-objective optimization of chassis integrated system for electric wheel vehicle. P I Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci. 2019;233(1):7–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarpiz, Particle Swarm Optimization in MATLAB. [online] [cited 2020 Jan 10] Available from: https://yarpiz.com/50/ypea102-particle-swarm-optimization
   Google Scholar
• Wager G, Whale J, Braunl T. Performance evaluation of regenerative braking systems. P I Mech Eng D J Aut Eng. 2018;232(10):1414–1427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsubishi, MiEV Technical Specifications. [Online] [cited 2020 Jan 13] Available from: https://www.mitsubishi-motors.com/en/showroom/i-miev/specifications/
   Google Scholar
• Dabadie J, Sciarretta A, Font G, et al. Automatic generation of online optimal energy management strategies for hybrid powertrain simulation. SAE Technical Paper 2017-24-0173, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Zou J, Yang Y, et al. Design and simulation of pressure coordinated control system for hybrid vehicle regenerative braking system. J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control. 2014;136(5):1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantoni C, Cesarini R, Mastinu G, et al. Brake comfort – a review. Veh Syst Dyn. 2009;47(8):901–947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oleksowicz SA, Burnham KJ, Southgate A, et al. Regenerative braking strategies, vehicle safety and stability control systems: critical use-case proposals. Veh Syst Dyn. 2013;51(5):684–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar