Comparison of wheel–rail contact models in the context of multibody system simulation: Hertzian versus non-Hertzian

References

• Shabana AA, Zaazaa KE. Railroad vehicle dynamics a computational approach. New York (NY): CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Meymand SZ, Keylin A, Ahmadian M. A survey of wheel–rail contact models for rail vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn. 2016;54(3):386–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertz H. Über die Berührung fester, elastischer Körper und über die Härte. J Reine Angew Math. 1881;92:156–171.
   Google Scholar
• Yan W, Fischer F. Applicability of the Hertz contact theory to rail-wheel contact problems. Arch Appl Mech. 2000;70:255–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalker JJ. Three-dimensional elastic bodies in rolling contact. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Kik W, Piotrowski J. A fast, approximate method to calculate normal load at contact between wheel and rail and creep forces during rolling. In: Zobory I, editor. Proceedings of 2nd Mini-conference on Contact Mechanics and Wear of Rail/Wheel Systems. Hungary: Technical University of Budapest; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Liu B, Bruni S, Vollebregt E. A non-Hertzian method for solving wheel–rail normal contact problem taking into account the effect of yaw. Veh Syst Dyn. 2016;54(9):1226–1246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayasse JB, Chollet H. Determination of the wheel rail contact patch in semi-Hertzian conditions. Veh Syst Dyn. 2005;43(3):161–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder C. Verschleiß von Eisenbahnrädern mit Unrundheiten [Dissertation Nr. 12342]. Zurich: ETH; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Pascal JP, Sauvage G. New method for reducing the multicontact wheel/rail problem to one equivalent contact patch. Veh Syst Dyn. 1992;20(1):475–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalker JJ. A fast algorithm for the simplified theory of rolling contact. Veh Syst Dyn. 1982;11:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollebregt E, Iwnicki S, Xie G, et al. Assessing the accuracy of different simplified frictional rolling contact algorithms. Veh Syst Dyn. 2012;50:1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piotrowski J, Liu B, Bruni S. The Kalker book of tables for non-Hertzian contact of wheel and rail. Veh Syst Dyn. 2017;55(6):875–901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piotrowski J, Bruni S, Liu B, et al. A fast method for determination of creep forces in non-Hertzian wheel-rail contact based on a book of tables. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2019;45:169–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollebregt E. User guide for CONTACT, rolling and sliding contact with friction. Technical report TR09-03, version 17.1. Delft: VORtech BV; 2017. Available from: www.kalkersoftware.org.
   Google Scholar
• Shackleton P, Iwnicki S. Comparison of wheel–rail contact codes for railway vehicle simulation: an introduction to the Manchester contact benchmark and initial results. Veh Syst Dyn. 2008;46:129–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao G, Wen Z, Zhao X, et al. Effects of wheel-rail contact modelling on wheel wear simulation. Wear. 2016;366–367:146–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sichani MS, Enblom R, Berg M. A novel method to model wheel–rail normal contact in vehicle dynamics simulation. Veh Syst Dyn. 2014;52(12):1752–1764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma X, Wang P, Xu J, et al. Comparison of non-Hertzian modeling approaches for wheel–rail rolling contact mechanics in the switch panel of a railway turnout. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2019;233(4):466–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieringer A, Kropp W, Nielsen JCO. The influence of contact modelling on simulated wheel/rail interaction due to wheel flats. Wear. 2014;314(1–2):273–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgelman N, Sichani MS, Enblom R, et al. Influence of wheel–rail contact modelling on vehicle dynamic simulation. Veh Syst Dyn. 2015;53(8):1190–1203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magalhães H, Marques F, Liu B, et al. Implementation of a non-Hertzian contact model for railway dynamic application. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2020;48:41–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwnicki S, editor. The Manchester benchmarks for rail vehicle simulation, Volume 31 of supplement to vehicle system dynamics. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Schupp G, Weidemann C, Mauer L. Modelling the contact between wheel and rail within multibody system simulation. Veh Syst Dyn. 2004;41(5):349–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascal J-P, Sany JR. Dynamics of an isolated railway wheelset with conformal wheel–rail interactions. Veh Syst Dyn. 2019;57(12):1947–1969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollebregt EAH. Comments on ‘the Kalker book of tables for non-Hertzian contact of wheel and rail’. Veh Syst Dyn. 2018;56(9):1451–1459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu B, Bruni S. Comparison of wheel-rail contact modelling in multibody system online simulation. In: Klomp M, Bruzelius F, Nielsen J, et al., editors. Advances in dynamics of vehicles on roads and tracks. Gothenburg: Springer International Publishing; 2020. p. 694–703.
   Google Scholar
• Pradhan S, Samantaray AK, Bhattacharyya R. Prediction of railway wheel wear and its influence on the vehicle dynamics in a specific operating sector of Indian railways network. Wear. 2018;406–407:92–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan S, Samantaray A, Bhattacharyya R. Multi-step wear evolution simulation method for the prediction of rail wheel wear and vehicle dynamic performance. Simulation. 2019;95(5):441–459.
   Google Scholar
• Braghin F, Lewis R, Dwyer-Joyce RS, et al. A mathematical model to predict railway wheel profile evolution due to wear. Wear. 2006;261(11):1253–1264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harder RF. Creep force – creepage and frictional work behaviour in non-Hertzian counter formal rail wheel contacts, Proceedings International Heavy Haul Association Specialist Technical Session on Wheel Rail Interface; June 14–17, Moscow, Russia, 1999. p. 207–214.
   Google Scholar
• Marques F, Magalhaes H, Liu B, et al. On the generation of enhanced lookup tables for wheel-rail contact models. Wear. 2019;434–435. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2019.202993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Q, Spiryagin M, Cole C, et al. Parallel computing in railway research. Int J Rail Transp. 2018. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/23248378.2018.1553115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar