Optimal control of a NASCAR – specification race car

References

• Scherenberg H. Mercedes-Benz racing design and cars experience. SAE Trans. 1958;66(580042):414–420.
   Google Scholar
• Roland RD, Thelin CF. Computer simulation of Watkins Glen grand prix circuit performance. Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory; 1971. (Technical Report ZL-5002-K-1).
   Google Scholar
• Gadola M, Vetturi D, Cambiaghi D, et al. A tool for lap time simulation; 1996. (SAE Technical Papers).
   Google Scholar
• Braghin F, Cheli F, Melzi S, et al. Race driver model. Comput Struct. 2008;86(13–14):1503–1516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatwal H, Mikulcik EC. Some inverse solutions to an automobile path-tracking problem with input control of steering and brakes. Veh Syst Dyn. 1986;15(2):61–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujioka T, Kimura T. Numerical simulation of minimum-time cornering behavior. JSAE Rev. 1992;13(1):44–51.
   Google Scholar
• Wu AK, Miele A. Sequential conjugate gradient-restoration algorithm for optimal control problems with non-differential constraints and general boundary conditions, part I. Opt Control Appl Methods. 1980;1(1):69–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu AK, Miele A. Sequential conjugate gradient-restoration algorithm for optimal control problems with non-differential constraints and general boundary conditions, part II. Opt Control Appl Methods. 1980;1(2):119–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrikx JPM, Meijlink TJJ, Kriens RFC. Application of optimal control theory to inverse simulation of car handling. Veh Syst Dyn. 1996;26(6):449–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk DE. Optimal control theory: an introduction. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Casanova D, Sharp RS, Symonds P. Minimum time manoeuvring: the significance of yaw inertia. Veh Syst Dyn. 2000;34(2):77–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly DP, Sharp RS. Time-optimal control of the race car: a numerical method to emulate the ideal driver. Veh Syst Dyn. 2010;48(12):1461–1474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou JL, Tits AL, Lawrence CT. User's guide for FSQP version 3.0: a Fortran code for solving nonlinear (minimax) optimization problems, generating iterates satisfying all inequality and linear constraints. College Park (MD): Institute for Systems Research, University of Maryland; 1997. (Technical Report TR 92-107).
   Google Scholar
• Lovato S, Massaro M. A three-dimensional free-trajectory quasi-steady-state optimal-control method for minimum-lap-time of race vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn. 2021:1–19. doi:10.1080/00423114.2021.1878242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lot R, Evangelou SA. Lap time optimization of a sports series hybrid electric vehicle. Proceedings of the world congress on engineering, Vol. III, London; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp RS, Peng Huei. Vehicle dynamics applications of optimal control theory. Veh Syst Dyn. 2011;49(7):1073–1111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massaro M, Limebeer DJN. Minimum-lap-time optimization and simulation. Veh Syst Dyn. 2021;59(7):1069–1113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limebeer DJN, Massaro M. Dynamics and optimal control of road vehicles. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Lovato S, Massaro M, Limebeer DJ.N. Curved-ribbon-based track modelling for minimum lap-time optimisation. Meccanica. 2021;56:2139–2152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limebeer DJN, Perantoni G. Optimal control of a formula one car on a three-dimensional track part 2: optimal control. ASME J Dyn Syst Meas Control. 2015;137(5). doi:10.1115/1.4029466 (13 pages).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perantoni G, Limebeer DJN. Optimal control of a formula one car on a three-dimensional track. Part 1: track modelling and identification. ASME J Dyn Syst Meas Control. 2015;137(5). doi:10.1115/1.4028253 (11 pages).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fork T, Tseng HE, Borrelli F. Models and predictive control for nonplanar vehicle navigation; 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.08427.
   Google Scholar
• Rao AV, Benson DA, Darby C, et al. Algorithm 902: Gpops, a matlab software for solving multiple-phase optimal control problems using the gauss pseudospectral method. ACM Trans Math Softw (TOMS). 2010;37(2):1–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cossalter V, Da Lio M, Lot R, et al. A general method for the evaluation of vehicle manoeuvrability with special emphasis on motorcycles. Veh Syst Dyn. 1999;31(2):113–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold VI. Mathematical methods of classical mechanics. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Kreyszig E. Differential geometry. 1st ed. New York: Dover; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson MA, Rao AV. GPOPS – II: a matlab software for solving multiple-phase optimal control problems using hp-adaptive Gaussian quadrature collocation methods and sparse nonlinear programming. ACM Trans Math Softw. 2014;41(1). doi:10.1145/2558904 (37 pages).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wächter A, Biegler LT. On the implementation of an interior-point filter line-search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming. Math Program. 2006;106:25–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TNO Automotive. MF-tool 6.1 users manual; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Trabesinger A. Power games. Nature. 2007;447:900–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perantoni G, Limebeer DJN. Optimal control of a formula one car with variable parameters. Veh Syst Dyn. 2014;52(5):653–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masouleh MI, Limebeer DJN. Optimizing the A–suspension interactions in a formula one car. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2016;24(3):912–927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar