Publication Cover
Vehicle System Dynamics
International Journal of Vehicle Mechanics and Mobility
Volume 61, 2023 - Issue 9
515
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Three-dimensional contact formulation for assessment of dynamic interaction of pantograph and overhead conductor rail system

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 2432-2455 | Received 21 Apr 2022, Accepted 03 Aug 2022, Published online: 22 Aug 2022

References

  • Mandai T, Shimizu M, Harada S. Development of rigid conductor line for high-speed operation. Proc IEEE Int Conf Ind Technol. 2003;1:587–592.
  • Chen L, Liu Z, Zhang J, et al. Lecture notes in mechanical engineering. Lect. Notes Mech. Eng. 2020. Springer International Publishing. Available from: doi:10.1007/978-3-030-38077-9_25.
  • Simarro M, Castillo JJ, Cabrera JA, et al. Evaluation of the influence of the speed, preload and span length on the contact forces in the interaction between the pantograph and the overhead conductor rail. Eng Struct. 2021;243:112678, Available from: doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112678.
  • Yamashita K, Kitajo K, Wada S, et al. Impact oscillations with multiple modes between a pantograph and an overhead rigid conductor line in a railway current collection system. J Vib Control. 2012;18:499–508.
  • Koyama T, Aboshi M. Mechanism of undulating wear formation of overhead rigid conductor line related to dynamic characteristics of pantographs. J Syst Des Dyn. 2012;6:641–654.
  • Koyama T, Aboshi M. Formation mechanism of undulating wear on overhead conductor rails due to dynamic characteristics of pantographs. Q Rep RTRI. 2013;54:18–23.
  • Bruni S, Bucca G, Carnevale M, et al. Pantograph–catenary interaction: recent achievements and future research challenges. Int J Rail Transp. 2018;6:57–82. Available from: doi:10.1080/23248378.2017.1400156.
  • Wu TX, Brennan MJ. Dynamic stiffness of a railway overhead wire system and its effect on pantograph-catenary system dynamics. J Sound Vib. 1999;219:483–502.
  • Lopez-Garcia O, Carnicero A, Maroño JL. Influence of stiffness and contact modelling on catenary-pantograph system dynamics. J Sound Vib. 2007;299:806–821.
  • Zhang W, Liu Y, Mei G. Evaluation of the coupled dynamical response of a pantograph—catenary system: contact force and stresses. Veh Syst Dyn. 2006;44:645–658.
  • Massat JP, Laine JP, Bobillot A. Pantograph–catenary dynamics simulation. Veh Syst Dyn. 2006;44:551–559.
  • Hao X, Wang S. Optimal modeling and simulation of power supply pantograph - catenary system in rail transit. Comput Simul. 2013;30:194–198.
  • Guan J, Wu J. Dynamic coupling equations between pantograph and overhead rigid conductor rail by using numerical method. J Railw Sci Eng. 2016;13:362–368.
  • Song Y, Liu Z, Wang H, et al. Nonlinear modelling of high-speed catenary based on analytical expressions of cable and truss elements. Veh Syst Dyn. 2015;53:1455–1479.
  • Collina A, Bruni S. Numerical simulation of pantograph-overhead equipment interaction. Veh Syst Dyn. 2002;38:261–291.
  • Antunes P, Ambrósio J, Pombo J, et al. A new methodology to study the pantograph–catenary dynamics in curved railway tracks. Veh Syst Dyn. 2020;58:425–452. Available from: doi:10.1080/00423114.2019.1583348.
  • Seo JH, Kim SW, Jung IH, et al. Dynamic analysis of a pantograph-catenary system using absolute nodal coordinates. Veh Syst Dyn. 2006;44:615–630.
  • Song Y, Antunes P, Pombo J, et al. A methodology to study high-speed pantograph-catenary interaction with realistic contact wire irregularities. Mech Mach Theory. 2020;152:103940.
  • Gregori S, Gil J, Tur M, et al. Analysis of the overlap section in a high-speed railway catenary by means of numerical simulations. Eng Struct. 2020;221:110963.
  • Zhou N, Zou H, Zou D, et al. Investigation on the applicability of pantograph and catenary model urban railway system. J Southwest Jiaotong Univ. 2017;52:408–415 + 423.
  • Song Y, Zhang M, Øiseth O, et al. Wind deflection analysis of railway catenary under crosswind based on nonlinear finite element model and wind tunnel test. Mech Mach Theory. 2022;168:104608.
  • Vera C, Suarez B, Paulin J, et al. Simulation model for the study of overhead rail current collector systems dynamics, focused on the design of a new conductor rail. Veh Syst Dyn. 2006;44:595–614.
  • Bautista A, Montesinos J, Pintado P. Dynamic interaction between pantograph and rigid overhead lines using a coupled FEM — multibody procedure. Mech Mach Theory. 2016;97:100–111. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2015.10.009.
  • Chover JA, Suarez B, Rodriguez P. Simulation techniques for design of overhead conductor rail lines for speeds over 140 km/h). 22nd int symp Dyn Veh roads tracks (IAVSD 2011); 2011;14:19.
  • Simarro M, Postigo S, Cabrera JA, et al. A procedure for validating rigid catenary models using evolutionary techniques. Comput Struct. 2020;228:106145, Available from: doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2019.106145.
  • Chen L, Duan F, Song Y, et al. Assessment of dynamic interaction performance of high-speed pantograph and overhead conductor rail system. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2022;71:9001914.
  • Zhang W, Shen Z. Investigation on pantograph dynamics. J China Railw Soc. 1993;15:23–30.
  • Mei G, Zhang W. Linear model of vertical dynamics of pantograph and study on characteristics. J China Railw Soc. 2002;24:28–32.
  • Simarro M, Postigo S, Prado-Novoa M, et al. Analysis of contact forces between the pantograph and the overhead conductor rail using a validated finite element model. Eng Struct. 2020;225:111265, Available from: doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111265.
  • Song Y, Liu Z, Rxnnquist A, et al. Contact wire irregularity stochastics and effect on high-speed railway pantograph-catenary interactions. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas. 2020;69:8196–8206.
  • Massat JP, Laurent C, Bianchi JP, et al. Pantograph catenary dynamic optimisation based on advanced multibody and finite element co-simulation tools. Veh Syst Dyn. 2014;52:338–354.
  • Ambrósio J, Rauter F, Pombo J, et al. Computational methods in applied sciences. Comput Methods Appl Sci. 2011;23:1–27.
  • Song Y, Ouyang H, Liu Z, et al. Active control of contact force for high-speed railway pantograph-catenary based on multi-body pantograph model. Mech Mach Theory. 2017;115:35–59.
  • Ambrósio J, Pombo J, Rauter F, et al. A memory based communication in the co-simulation of multibody and finite element codes for pantograph-catenary interaction simulation. Comput Methods Appl Sci. 2009;12:231–252.
  • Rauter FG, Pombo J, Ambrósio J, et al. Contact model for The pantograph-catenary interaction. J Syst Des Dyn. 2007;1:447–457.
  • Bucca G, Carnevale M, Collina A, et al. Adoption of different pantographs preloads to improve multiple collection and speed up existing lines. Veh Syst Dyn. 2012;50:403–418.
  • Daocharoenporn S, Mongkolwongrojn M, Kulkarni S, et al. Prediction of the pantograph/catenary wear using nonlinear multibody system dynamic algorithms. J Tribol. 2019;141:1–13.
  • Song Y, Wang Z, Liu Z, et al. A spatial coupling model to study dynamic performance of pantograph-catenary with vehicle-track excitation. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2021;151:107336, Available from: doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.107336.
  • European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization EN 50318. Railway applications – current collection systems – validation of simulation of the dynamic interaction between pantograph and overhead contact line. Brussels: European Standards (EN); 2002.
  • Kulkarni S, Pappalardo CM, Shabana AA. Pantograph/catenary contact formulations. J Vib Acoust. 2017;139:011010.
  • Pappalardo CM, Patel MD, Tinsley B, et al. Contact force control In multibody pantograph/catenary systems. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part K J Multi-Body Dyn. 2016;230:307–328.
  • Mei G. Tribological performance of rigid overhead lines against pantograph sliders under DC passage. Tribol Int. 2020;151:106538, Available from: doi:10.1016/j.triboint.2020.106538.
  • Wei XK, Meng HF, He JH, et al. Wear analysis and prediction of rigid catenary contact wire and pantograph strip for railway system. Wear. 2020;442–443:203118.
  • Rodríguez P, Suárez B, Chover JA, et al. Pantograph wear assesment in overhead conductor rail systems). 22nd int symp Dyn Veh roads tracks (IAVSD 2011); 2011.
  • Shabana AA. Dynamics of multibody systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University press; 2013.
  • Shabana AA, Hussien HA, Escalona JL. Application of the absolute nodal coordinate formulation to large rotation and large deformation problems. J Mech Des Trans ASME. 1998;120:188–195.
  • Tur M, García E, Baeza L, et al. A 3D absolute nodal coordinate finite element model to compute the initial configuration of a railway catenary. Eng Struct. 2014;71:234–243. Available from: doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.015.
  • Song Y, Rønnquist A, Navik P. Assessment of the high-frequency response in railway pantograph-catenary interaction based on numerical simulation. IEEE Trans Veh Technol. 2020;9545:1–1.
  • Berzeri M, Shabana AA. Development of simple models for the elastic forces in the absolute nodal co-ordinate formulation. J Sound Vib. 2000;235:539–565.
  • Liu F. Equivalent model of suspension structure for rigid suspension catenary. Electr Railw. 2009;1:28–32.
  • Van OV. Introduction of variability into pantograph-catenary dynamic simulations. Mechanics [physics.med-ph]. Ecole nationale sup´erieure d’arts et m´etiers - ENSAM, 2016. English. <NNT: 2016ENAM0021>.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.