Predictive maintenance in railway systems: MBS-based wheel and rail life prediction exemplified for the Swedish Iron-Ore line

References

• European Comission. “Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area – Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system,” White Paper COM(2011) 144 final, Mar. 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Gericke C, Hecht M. CargoCBM – Feature Generation and Classification for a Condition Monitoring System for Freight Wagons. J Phys Conf Ser. 2012;364:0012003. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/364/1/012003.
   Google Scholar
• Villarejo R, Johansson C-A, Galar D, et al. Context-driven decisions for railway maintenance. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit. 2016;230(5):1469–1483. doi:10.1177/0954409715607904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciocoiu L, Siemieniuch CE, Hubbard E-M. From preventative to predictive maintenance: The organisational challenge. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit. 2017;231(10):1174–1185. doi:10.1177/0954409717701785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins C, Liu X. Modeling of track geometry degradation and decisions on safety and maintenance: A literature review and possible future research directions. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit. 2018;232(5):1385–1397. doi:10.1177/0954409717721870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu W, Yang D, Huang J. A hybrid optimization strategy for the maintenance of the wheels of metro vehicles: Vehicle turning, wheel re-profiling, and multi-template use. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit. 2018;232(3):832–841. doi:10.1177/0954409717695649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Hu H, Roberts C, et al. Developing a life cycle cost model for real-time condition monitoring in railways under uncertainty. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit. 2017;231(1):111–121. doi:10.1177/0954409715619453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jendel T. Prediction of wheel profile wear—Comparisons with field measurements. Wear. 2002;253(1–2):89–99. doi:10.1016/S0043-1648(02)00087-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braghin F, Lewis R, Dwyer-Joyce RS, et al. A mathematical model to predict railway wheel profile evolution due to wear. Wear. 2006;261(11–12):1253–1264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apezetxea IS, Perez X, Casanueva C, et al. New methodology for fast prediction of wheel wear evolution. Veh Syst Dyn. 2017;55(7):1071–1097. doi:10.1080/00423114.2017.1299870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishna VV, Hossein-Nia S, Casanueva C, et al. Rail RCF damage quantification and comparision for different damage models. Railway Engineering Science; 30(1):23–40.
   Google Scholar
• Hossein-Nia S, Sichani MS, Stichel S, et al. Wheel life prediction model – an alternative to the FASTSIM algorithm for RCF. Veh Syst Dyn. 2018;56(7):1051–1071. doi:10.1080/00423114.2017.1403636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson KL. The Strength of Surfaces in Rolling Contact. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Mechanical Engineering Science. 1989;203(3):151–163. doi:10.1243/PIME_PROC_1989_203_100_02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archard JF. Contact and Rubbing of Flat Surfaces. J Appl Phys. 1953;24(8):981), doi:10.1063/1.1721448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spangenberg U, Fröhling RD, Els PS. Influence of wheel and rail profile shape on the initiation of rolling contact fatigue cracks at high axle loads. Veh Syst Dyn. 2016;54(5):638–652. doi:10.1080/00423114.2016.1150496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossein Nia S, Jönsson P-A, Stichel S, et al. “Investigation of Rolling Contact Fatigue on the wheels of a three-piece bogie on the Swedish Iron-Ore Line via multibody simulation considering extreme winter conditions,” In Proceedings of the international heavy haul conference, New Delhi, India, 2013, pp. 357–363.
   Google Scholar
• Ekberg A. “Iron-Ore line – Damage on loco wheels,” Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden, 20161214-LKAB-Lokhjul, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Persson I. GENSYS.1312 Reference Manual,” DEsolver AB, 2013. [Online]. Available: gensys.se.
   Google Scholar
• Hossein Nia S, Casanueva C, Stichel S. Prediction of RCF and wear evolution of Iron-Ore locomotive wheels. Wear. 2015;62–72:62–72. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2015.05.015.
   Google Scholar
• Spiryagin M, Polach O, Cole C. Creep force modelling for rail traction vehicles based on the Fastsim algorithm. Veh Syst Dyn. 2013;51(11):1765–1783. doi:10.1080/00423114.2013.826370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polach O. Creep forces in simulations of traction vehicles running on adhesion limit. Wear. 2005;258(7–8):992–1000. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2004.03.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sichani MS, Enblom R, Berg M. An alternative to FASTSIM for tangential solution of the wheel–rail contact. Veh Syst Dyn. 2016;54(6):748–764. doi:10.1080/00423114.2016.1156135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asplund M, Famurewa SM, Schoech W. A Nordic heavy haul experience and best practices. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit. 2017;231(7):794–804. doi:10.1177/0954409717699468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar