A study on approximate probability distribution and its parameters of derailment factor for high-speed trains

References

• Bolotin VV. Statistical theory of the aseismic design of structures. Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Earthquake Engineering; 1960 July 11–18; Tokio. pp. 1365–1374.
   Google Scholar
• Bolotin VV. Random vibrations of elastic systems. Boston (MA): Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Haciefendioglu K, Basaga HB, Banerjee S. Probabilistic analysis of historic masonry bridges to random ground motion by Monte Carlo Simulation using Response Surface Method. Constr Build Mater. 2017;134(MAR.1):199–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naess A, Leira BJ, Batsevych O. System reliability analysis by enhanced Monte Carlo simulation. Struct Safy. 2009;31(5):349–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Manohar CS. An improved response surface method for the determination of failure probability and importance measures. Struct Saf. 2004;26(2):123–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Chen JB. Probability density evolution method for dynamic response analysis of structures with uncertain parameters. Comput Mech. 2004;34(5):400–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin JH, Zhang YH, Li QS, et al. Seismic spatial effects for long-span bridges, using the pseudo excitation method. Eng Struct. 2004;26(9):1207–1216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin JH, Zhang YH, Zhao Y. Pseudo excitation method and some recent developments. Procedia Eng. 2011;14:2453–2458.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Li XZ, Jin ZB. Three-dimensional random vibrations of a high-speed-train–bridge time-varying system with track irregularities. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2016;230(8):1851–1876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Zhang YH, Lin JH. Random vibration analysis method for dynamic interaction of train and structures. Beijing: Science Press; 2018. [In Chinese.]
   Google Scholar
• Zhu ZH, Wang LD, Yu ZW, et al. Non-Stationary random vibration analysis of railway bridges under moving heavy-haul trains. Int J Struct Stab Dyn. 2018;18(03):1850035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He XH, Shi K, Wu T. An efficient analysis framework for high-speed train-bridge coupled vibration under non-stationary winds. Struct Infrastruct Eng. 2020;16(9):1326–1346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L, Xu YL. Extreme value of typhoon-induced non-stationary buffeting response of long-span bridges. Probabilistic Eng Mech. 2014;36(apr):19–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang ZC, Lin JH, Zhang YH, et al. Non-stationary random vibration analysis for train–bridge systems subjected to horizontal earthquakes. Eng Struct. 2010;32(11):3571–3582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu ZW, Mao JF. A stochastic dynamic model of train-track-bridge coupled system based on probability density evolution method. Appl Math Model. 2018;59(Jul):205–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu ZW, Mao JF. Probability analysis of train-track-bridge interactions using a random wheel/rail contact model. Eng Struct. 2017;144(Aug 1):120–138.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson R, Torstensson PT, Kabo E, et al. The influence of rail surface irregularities on contact forces and local stresses. Vehe Syst Dyn. 2015;53(1):68–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karttunen K, Kabo E, Ekberg A. A numerical study of the influence of lateral geometry irregularities on mechanical deterioration of freight tracks. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2012;226(6):575–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu L, Zhai WM, Gao J. A probabilistic model for track random irregularities in vehicle/track coupled dynamics. Appl Math Model. 2017;51:145–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montenegro PA, Carvalho H, Ribeiro D, et al. Assessment of train running safety on bridges: a literature review. Eng Struct. 2021;241:1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanabe M, Sogabe M, Wakui H, et al. Exact time integration for dynamic interaction of high-speed train and railway structure including derailment during an earthquake. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn. 2016;031004:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Poliakov V, Zhang N, Saurin V, et al. Running safety of a high-speed train within a bridge zone. Int J Struct Stab Dyn. 2020;20:Article 2050116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin ZB, Pei S, Li XZ, et al. Probabilistic evaluation approach for nonlinear vehicle–bridge dynamic performances. J Sound Vib. 2015;339:143–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai WM, Wang SL, Zhang N, et al. High-speed train–track–bridge dynamic interactions –Part II: experimental validation and engineering application. Int J Rail Transp. 2013;1(1-2):25–41.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstock HE. Wheel climb derailment criteria for evaluation of rail vehicle safety. Am Soc Mech Eng. 1984: 84. -WA/RT-1:1-7.
   Google Scholar
• Sweet LM, Karmel A. Evaluation of time-duration dependent wheel load criteria for wheelclimb derailment. J Dyn Syst Meas Control. 1981;103(3):219–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai WM. Vehicle–Track Coupled Dynamics. Beijing: Science Press; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Zhai WM, Hao ZL, Chen ZW, et al. Train–track–bridge dynamic interaction: a state-of-the-art review. Veh Syst Dyn. 2019;57:1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang N, Xia H. Dynamic analysis of coupled vehicle–bridge system based on inter-system iteration method. Comput Struct. 2013;114-115:26–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia H, Zhang N, Guo WW. Dynamic interaction of train-bridge systems in high-speed railways: theory and applications. Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University Press; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Marsaglia G. Ratios of normal variables. J Stat Softw. 2006;16(i04):1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick S. Extreme value, regular variation, and point processes. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Lilliefors HW. On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown. J Am Stat Assoc. 1967;62(318):399–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar