An optimal control approach to the computation of g-g diagrams

References

• Roy S, Alianello DA. A driver characterizing function–the g-g diagram. Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory; 1970. (Tech. Rep. VJ-2882-K).
   Google Scholar
• Rice RS. Measuring car-driver interaction with the g-g diagram. SAE; (730018).
   Google Scholar
• Milliken WF, Milliken DL. Race car vehicle dynamics. Warrendale (PA): SAE; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Gadola M, Vetturi D, Cambiaghi D, et al. A tool for lap time simulation. (SAE Technical Papers).DOI:10.4271/962529 null
   Google Scholar
• Brayshaw DL, Harrison MF. A quasi steady state approach to race car lap simulation in order to understand the effects of racing line and centre of gravity location, proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers. Pt D J Autom Eng. 2005;219(6):725–739. DOI:10.1243/095440705x11211
   Google Scholar
• Tremlett A, Assadian F, Purdy D, et al. Quasi-Steady-State linearisation of the racing vehicle acceleration envelope: a limited slip differential example. Veh Syst Dyn. 2014;52(11):1416–1442. DOI:10.1080/00423114.2014.943927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Castro R, Tanelli M, Arajo RE, et al. Minimum-time manoeuvring in electric vehicles with four wheel-individual-motors. Veh Sys Dyn. 2014;52(6):824–846. DOI:10.1080/00423114.2014.902973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novellis LD, Sorniotti A, Gruber P. Design and comparison of the handling performance of different electric vehicle layouts, proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers. Pt D J Autom Eng. 2014;228(2):218–232. DOI:10.1177/0954407013506569
   Google Scholar
• Tucker K, Gover R, Jazar RN, et al. A comparison of free trajectory quasi-steady-state and transient vehicle models in minimum time manoeuvres. Veh Sys Dyn. 2021;1–33. DOI:10.1080/00423114.2021.1983181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massaro M, Limebeer DJN. Minimum-lap-time optimisation and simulation. Veh Syst Dyn. 2021;59(7):1069–1113.DOI:10.1080/00423114.2021.1910718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelmann J, Plochl M. Handling characteristics and stability of the steady-state powerslide motion of an automobile. Regul Chaotic Dyn. 14(6):682–692. DOI:10.1134/s1560354709060069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson MA, Rao AV. GPOPS–II: A Matlab software for solving multiple-phase optimal control problems using hp-adaptive Gaussian quadrature collocation methods and sparse nonlinear programming. ACM Trans Math Softw. 41(1). DOI:10.1145/2558904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie Y, Faqir O, Kerrigan EC. Iclocs2: try this optimal control problem solver before you try the rest. In: 2018 UKACC 12th International Conference on Control (CONTROL). 2018. p. 336–336.DOI:10.1109/CONTROL.2018.8516795.
   Google Scholar
• Wächter A, Biegler LT. On the implementation of an interior-Point filter line-Search algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming. Math Program. 2006;106:25–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinstein MJ, Rao AV. Algorithm 984: adigator, a toolbox for the algorithmic differentiation of mathematical functions in matlab using source transformation via operator overloading. ACM Trans Math Softw. 44(2). DOI:10.1145/3104990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolazzi E, Biral F, Da Lio M. Symbolic-numeric indirect method for solving optimal control problems for large multibody systems. Multibody Syst Dyn. 2005;13:233–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dal Bianco N, Biral F, Bertolazzi E, et al. Comparison of direct and indirect methods for minimum lap time optimal control problems. Veh Syst Dyn. 2018;57(5):665–696. DOI:10.1080/00423114.2018.1480048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacejka HB. Tire and vehicle dynamics, 3rd ed. Great Britain: Elsevier; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Lovato S, Massaro M, Limebeer DJN. Curved-ribbon-based track modelling for minimum lap-time optimisation. Meccanica. 2021;56:2139–2152. DOI:10.1007/s11012-021-01387-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limebeer DJN, Bastin M, Warren E, et al. Optimal control of a nascar specification race car. Veh Syst Dyn. 2022:1–26. DOI:10.1080/00423114.2022.2067573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veneri M, Massaro M. A free-trajectory quasi-steady-state optimal-control method for minimum lap-time of race vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn. 2020;58(6):933–954. DOI:10.1080/00423114.2019.1608364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremlett A, Massaro M, Purdy D, et al. Optimal control of motorsport differentials. Veh Syst Dyn. 2015;53(12):1772–1794. DOI:10.1080/00423114.2015.1093150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Limebeer DJN, Massaro M. Dynamics and optimal control of road vehicles. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018. DOI:10.1093/oso/9780198825715.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Lovato S, Massaro M. A three-dimensional free-trajectory quasi-steady-state optimal-control method for minimum-lap-time of race vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn. 2022;60(5):1512–1530. DOI:10.1080/00423114.2021.1878242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiggiani M. The science of vehicle dynamics. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Dordrecht; 2014. DOI:10.1007/978-94-017-8533-4.
   Google Scholar
• Lovato S, Massaro M. Three-dimensional fixed-trajectory approaches to the minimum-lap time of road vehicles. Veh Syst Dyn. 2022;60(11):3650–3667. DOI:10.1080/00423114.2021.1969024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavernini D, Massaro M, Velenis E, et al. Minimum time cornering the effect of road surface and car transmission layout. Veh Sys Dyn. 2013;51(10):1533–1547. DOI:10.1080/00423114.2013.813557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavernini D, Velenis E, Lot R, et al. The optimality of the handbrake cornering technique. J Dyn Syst Meas Control. 136(4). DOI:10.1115/1.4026836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar