Investigation of transient wheel-rail interaction and interface contact behaviour in movable-point crossing panel

References

• Wang P. Design of high-speed railway turnouts: theory and applications. 2nd ed Chengdu: Academic Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wang P, Ma X, Xu J, et al. Numerical investigation on effect of the relative motion of stock/switch rails on the load transfer distribution along the switch panel in high-speed railway turnout. Veh Syst Dyn. 2019;57(2):226–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren Z, Sun S, Xie G. A method to determine the two-point contact zone and transfer of wheel-rail forces in a turnout. Veh Syst Dyn. 2010;48(10):1115–1133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugiyama H, Tanii Y, Matsumura R. Analysis of wheel-rail contact geometry on railroad turnout using longitudinal interpolation of rail profiles. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn. 2011;6(2):024501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pålsson BA, Ambur R, Sebès M, et al. A comparison of track model formulations for simulation of dynamic vehicle-track interaction in switches and crossings. Veh Syst Dyn. 2023;61(3):698–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaar N, Berg M. Simulation of vehicle-track interaction with flexible wheelsets,: moving track models and field tests. Veh Syst Dyn. 2006;44(sup1):921–931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan C, Markine V, Shevtsov I. Improvement of vehicle-turnout interaction by optimising the shape of crossing nose. Veh Syst Dyn. 2014;52(11):1517–1540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pålsson BA, Nielsen JC. Dynamic vehicle-track interaction in switches and crossings and the influence of rail pad stiffness-field measurements and validation of a simulation model. Veh Syst Dyn. 2015;53(6):734–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassa E, Andersson C, Nielsen JC. Simulation of dynamic interaction between train and railway turnout. Veh Syst Dyn. 2006;44(3):247–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassa E, Nielsen JC. Dynamic train-turnout interaction in an extended frequency range using a detailed model of track dynamics. J Sound Vib. 2009;320(4-5):893–914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco-lorenzo J, Santamaria J, Vadillo EG, et al. On the influence of conformity on wheel-rail rolling contact mechanics. Tribol Int. 2016;103(6):47–67.
   Google Scholar
• An B, Wang P. A wheel–rail normal contact model using the combination of virtual penetration method and strip-like Boussinesq’s integral. Veh Syst Dyn. 2023;61(6):1583–1601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nackenhorst U, Zastran B. On the finite element analysis of steady state wheel-rail rolling contact. Z Angew Math Mech. 2001;81(S40):1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Li Z. The solution of frictional wheel-rail rolling contact with a 3D transient finite element model: validation and error analysis. Wear. 2011;271(1-2):444–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pletz M, Daves W, Ossberger H. A wheelset/crossing model regarding impact,: sliding and deformation-explicit finite element approach. Wear. 2012;294:446–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin L, Markine V, Shevtsov I. Numerical analysis of the dynamic interaction between wheelset and turnout crossing using the explicit finite element method. Veh Syst Dyn. 2016;54(3):301–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin L. Long-term behavior of railway crossings: wheel-rail interaction and rail fatigue life prediction. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Wiest M, Daves W, Fischer FD, et al. Deformation and damage of a crossing nose due to wheel passages. Wear. 2008;265(9-10):1431–1438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao J, Zhang F, Qian L. Numerical simulation of stress and deformation in a railway crossing. Eng Fail Anal. 2011;18(8):2296–2304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiedorn J. Crossings-deformation, damage and optimization. University of Leoben, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Wiedorn J, Daves W, Ossberger U, et al. Simplified explicit finite element model for the impact of a wheel on a crossing-validation and parameter study. Tribol Int. 2017;111:254–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiedorn J, Daves W, Ossberger U, et al. Numerical assessment of materials used in railway crossings by predicting damage initiation-validation and application. Wear. 2018;414:136–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma Y, Mashal AA, Markine VL. Modelling and experimental validation of dynamic impact in 1: 9 railway crossing panel. Tribol Int. 2018;118:208–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Xu J, Liu Y, et al. An investigation into transient frictional rolling contact behaviour in a switch panel: validation and numerical simulation. Veh Syst Dyn. 2020;60(1):114–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molodova M, Li Z, Dollevoet R. Axle box acceleration: measurement and simulation for detection of short track defects. Wear. 2011;271(1-2):349–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Wen Z, Zhu M, et al. A study on high-speed rolling contact between a wheel and a contaminated rail. Veh Syst Dyn. 2014;52(10):1270–1287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Z, Shen C, Li Z, et al. Wheel-rail impact at crossings: relating dynamic frictional contact to degradation. J Comput. Nonlinear Dyn. 2017;12(4).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao G, Wang L, Wen Z, et al. Experimental investigation into the mechanism of the polygonal wear of electric locomotive wheels. Veh Syst Dyn. 2018;56:883–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin X. Experimental and numerical modal analyses of high-speed train wheelsets. Proc Inst Mech Eng F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2016;230(3):643–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz BJ, Richardson MH. Introduction to operating deflection shapes. CSI Reliabil Week. 1999;10(538):121–126.
   Google Scholar
• Gao Y, Wang S, Xu J, et al. Numerical investigation of crack initiation on rail surfaces considering laminar plasma quenching technology. Tribol Int. 2021;154:106755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar