247
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Vestiges of the Earliest Russian Vernacular

Pages 350-355 | Published online: 04 Dec 2015

  • “Drevnejšaja russkaja nadpisɔ”, Vestnik Akademii Nauk SSSR 20: 4, 1950, 71–79.
  • “K voprosu o gnezdovskoj nadpisi”, Izvestija Akademii Nauk SSSR-Otdelenie literatury i jazyka 9,1950, 398–401. A reproduction of the vessel with the inscription is appended.
  • “Dva objevy starých slovanských nápisů”, Slavia 20,1951, 497–514. The second specimen discussed by the author is the Bulgarian Cyrillic inscription of 943, uncovered in 1950 in Dobruja and still awaiting verification.
  • Cf. F. Miklosich, Die Bildung der slavischen Personen- und Ortsnamen, Heidelberg 1927, 9, 50.
  • B. Rybakov, Remeslo drevnej Rusi, Moscow 1948, 197ff (reproductions on p. 198); idem, “Remeslo”, Istorija kulɔtury drevnej Rusi I, Moscow 1948, 108ff (reproductions on p. 110).
  • Očberki po istorii byta domongolɔskoj Rusi [= Trudy Gos. Istoričeskogo Muzeja 5], Moscow 1929, 38. Rybakov's reading of this inscription in his cited book, p. 370f, is unconvincing. Cf. also his article: Nadpisɔ kievskogo gončara XI veka, Kratkie soobščenija Instituto materialɔnoj kulɔtury 12, 1946, 134–8. Other examples of Old Russian inscriptions on objects, confined to possessive adjectives: nevestočъe [prjaslo] in Vysgorod = whorl belonging to nevěstъka ‘daughter or sister-in-law’; juriščina [bъčъυъ or bъčъka] ‘Jurišče's barrel’ in Novgorod, XII-XIII century: A. Arcixovskij, Novgorodskaja èkspedicija, Kratkie soobščenija… XXVII, 113–22 (with reproductions). The inscription on a boot-tree of the XIII-XIV cenury, excavated in Novgorod (ibid.), is mne.i, probably mneni [sapozi] 'Mьnenъ‘s boots’; cf. Old Czech Mnen occurring in the Necrologium of Podlažice, XIII century, and derived, as well as Mňata, from mъn- ‘minor’: for the suffix -en- in Slavic personal names examples are collected by Miklosich, p. 8. The inscription on the lid of a bucket excavated in Novgorod and assigned by Arcixovskij roughly to the twelfth century (see below, footnote 7) presents a Glagolitic M followed by a Cyrillic n: the Glagolitic letter apparently stands for its spelling-name myslite or rather myslěte, and the whole sequence intimates mysljatenъ, originally mysljatъnъ [korъcъ or kъbъlъ or okoυъ] ‘Mysljata's bucket’ (cf. vladyčъnъ, dъčerъnъ, gospodъnъ). Finally, in some inscriptions the name of the owner or giver appears as a mere signature: such is the name molodilo on a whorl, discovered by Gorodcov in Rjazan' (see Rybakov, Remeslo…; 198).
  • See E. Kletnova, “Velikij Gnezdovskij mogilɔnik,” Niederlův sborník, Prague 1925, 316ff.; K. Horálek, Rajhradské Martyrologium Adonis a otázka české cyrilice, Listy filologické 66, 1939, 23ff.
  • “Novye otkrytija v Novgorode”, Voprosy istorii 1951, No. 12, 77–87 (with the tracings of five documents; deed No. 9 is reproduced on p. 83). Another variant of his report: “Arxeologičeskie otkrytija v Novgorode”, Vestnik Akademii Nauk SSSR 21:12, 1951, 60–69 (with photographs of two documents, in particular deed No. 9).
  • “Dragocennye pamjatniki drevnerusskoj pisɔmennosti”, Voprosy jazykoznanija 1952, No. 3, 131–136.
  • “Novgorodskaja berestjanaja gramota No. 9”, ibid., 137–140.
  • Povestɔ vremennyx let, Leningrad 1950, 1.24 and 2.185. Cf. E. Hermelin, Über den Gebrauch der Präsens-Partizipien von perfektiven Verben im Altkirchenslavischen, Uppsala 1935, where the ancient use of these forms in Slavic languages, and their “Zukunftsbedeutung” in particular, is discussed; M. Korneeva-Petrulan, “K izučeniju sostava i jazyka dogovorov russkix s grekami,” Učenye zapiski Mosk. Gos. Univ. 150, 1952, 255–81.
  • “The Russian Primary Chronicle”, Harvard Studies and Notes in Philology and Literature 12, 1930, 150.
  • Cf. A. Šaxmatov, Očerk drevnejšego perioda istorii russkogo jazyka, SPB 1915, 114f.
  • Cf. V. Vinogradov in Izvestija Otd. rus. jaz. i slov. Ross. Ak. Nauk XXIV, 1923, p. 174 ff., especially such Novgorod texts as the letter quoted on p. 186, spelling vsim, but poexali.
  • Pesni collected by P. Rybnikov, III, Moscow 1910, p. 210.
  • D. Lixačev, Russkie letopisi i ix kulɔturno-istoričeskoe značenie, Leningrad 1947, p. 132 ff.
  • D. Sadovnikov, Sbornik zagadok, voprosov, pritč i zadač, SPB 1901, #2180.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.