Advanced search
Publication Cover
WORD Volume 13, 1957 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
222
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Masculine and Neuter in South-Central Italian

Robert L. PolitzerUniversity of Michigan
Pages 441-446 | Published online: 04 Dec 2015

  • G. Rohlfs, Historische Grammatik der italienischen Sprache, Vol. II, Bern, 1949, pp. 133–135.
  • Rohlfs, op. cit., Vol. I, p. 61.
  • Rohlfs, op. cit., Vol. II, p. 135.
  • C. Merlo. « Dei Continuatori del lat. ille in alcuni.dialetti dell'Italia centro meridionale », ZBPh, XXX (1906), 211–251, 438–454.
  • J. Corominas, « Notas de linguistica italo-hispanica con occasion de dos libros nuevos », Nueva Revista de filologia hispanico, X (1956), 137–186, p. 154.
  • H. Lausberg, « Zum romanischen Vokalismus », Romanische Forschungen, LX (1947), 295–317.
  • H. Lausberg, « Bemerkungen zur italienischen Lautlehre », ZRPh, LXVIII (1951), 318–332; Romanische Sprachwissenschaft, Vol. I, Berlin, 1956, p. 150.
  • See Frieda N. and Robert L. Politzer, Romance Trends in 7th and 8th Century Latin Documents, Chapel Hill, 1953, p. 14, pp. 17–21.
  • Codex diplomalicus Cavensis, Naples, 1874.
  • In this connection it should be noted that the scribes use the -u ending quite regularly in proper names and especially in place names: Anzanu (p. 9), Pesclu (p. 7), Waldu (p. 4), Caslanelu (p. 13), etc.
  • The influence of the -us neuter could be the real reason why some neuters apparently turn masculine in some dialects. Thus Rohlfs, op. cit., Vol. II, p. 134, reports for Neris o granu (neuter), but u pralu (masculine).
  • V. de Bartholomaeis, « Spoglio del Codex diplomaticus Cavensis », Archivio Glottologico italiano, XV (1901), 247–274, 327–362.
  • See R. L. Politzer, « On the Phonemic Interpretation of Late Latin Orthography », Language, XXVII (1951), 151–154.
  • Corominas, op. cit., p. 155.
  • Robert L. Politzer, « Far fare qualche cosa », Word, V (1949), 258–261; « Vulgar Latin es > Italian i », Italica, XXVIII (1951), 1–5: confusion of active and passive infinitive, amarejamari, was possible in Italy. The Italian -i ending is the result of -ēs > i rather than -i > i.
  • I have noted elsewhere (R. L. Politzer, “On the Origin of the Italian Plurals”, Romanic Review, LXIII (1952), 272–281, p. 278) that in the Italian Codice diplomatico longobardo, u is used for ọ in 10% of all cases counting all positions, but that us for os occurs in 49% of all instances.
  • See Frieda N. Politzer and Robert L. Politzer, op. cit., pp. 17–21., pp. 26–27.
  • See Rohlfs, op. cit., Vol. I, p. 62.
  • See Rohlfs, op. cit., Vol. I, p. 60.
  • Corominas, op. cit., p. 155.
  • Max L. Wagner, Historische Lautlehre des Sardischen, Halle, 1941, p. 11.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.