181
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Slavic o- and ā-Stem Accusatives

Pages 238-243 | Published online: 16 Jun 2015

  • The is substituted analogically after the palatalized stem, it being one of the back vowels possible after palatalized consonant, cf. point 6 in the body of the text.
  • The fronted variant of the ending -ˇ, viz. -ǐ is modeled after the unpalatalized stem, since a -ˇ would be impossible after a palatalized consonant or /j/. It is necessary to posit fronting before the passage of */a/ to */ˇ/ before */N/ in a closed syllable, because */jaNs/ passed to /j¸/, whereas */aNs/ passed to */uNs/ and eventually to /y/. Fronting seems to have taken place before the action of the law of open syllables, because we also find that */jai/> */jei/ and to /ji/. The treatment of */ai/ after */j/ is similar to the treatment of */ei/.
  • André Vaillant, Grammaire comparée des langues slaves, Vol. I (Paris, 1950), p. 148.
  • V. F. Mareš, “Proisxoždenie slavjanskogo nosovogo ,” Voprosy slavjanskogo jazykoznanija VII (1963), 7–11.
  • Vaillant, op. cit., p. 192.
  • Jan Endzelin, Latviešu valodas gramatika (Riga, 1951), paragraph 224.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.