Investigating acceptability in Australian English

REFERENCES

• Allen, R. L. 1966. The verb system of present-day American English. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Bauschatz, R C. 1972. “The modal auxiliaries of English, Middle to Modern: Their semantics.” Diss., Columbia Univ. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms.
   Google Scholar
• Bolinger, D. 1968. “Judgements of grammaticality.” Lingua 21:34–40.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. C. 1978. “Dare and need in Australian English: A study of divided usage.” English studies 59: 434–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, P. C.. 1979. “Elicitation experiments on acceptability in Australian English.” Speech and language research centre, Macquarie University: Working papers. Vol. 2, No. 4. Pp. 1–49.
   Google Scholar
• Eagleson, R. D. 1972. “Aspects of Australian English usage.” Proceedings and papers of the fourteenth congress of the Australasian universities language and literature association held 19–26 January 1972 at the University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. Dunedin, NZ: AULLA. Pp. 204–16.
   Google Scholar
• Eagleson, R. D.. 1977. “Sociolinguistic reflections on acceptability.” In Greenbaum (1977). Pp. 63–71.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrman, M. 1966. The meanings of the modals in present-day American English. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Follett, W. 1966. Modern American usage. New York: Longmans.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, H. W. 1965. A dictionary of modern English usage. 2nd ed. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenbaum, S. 1973. “Informant elicitation of data on syntactic variation.” Lingua 31: 201–12.
   Google Scholar
• Greenbaum, S.. 1974. “Problems in the negation of modals.” Moderna språk 68: 244–55.
   Google Scholar
• Greenbaum, S., ed. 1977. Acceptability in language. Contributions to the sociology of language, 17. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Greenbaum, S., and R. Quirk. 1970. Elicitation experiments in English: Linguistic studies in use and attitude. London: Longmans.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschland, E. 1969. “Ought (to).” Seminar report on elicitation techniques. Brown University, mimeo.
   Google Scholar
• Huddleston, R. D. 1976. An introduction to English transformational syntax. London: Longmans.
   Google Scholar
• Langendoen, D. T. 1970. Essentials of English grammar. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Leech, G. N. 1971. Meaning and the English verb. London: Longmans.
   Google Scholar
• Greenbaum, S. and J. Svartvik. 1975. A communicative grammar of English. London: Longmans.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W., G. Van Gent, A. Haans, and A. Meijers. 1977. “Grammaticality, paraphrase, and imagery.” In Greenbaum (1977). Pp. 87–101.
   Google Scholar
• Lightfoot, D. 1974. “The diachronic analysis of English modals.” Historical linguistics: Proceedings of the first international conference on historical linguistics, Edinburgh, 2–7 September 1973. Eds. J. M. Anderson and C. Jones. Vol. 1: Syntax, morphology, internal and comparative reconstruction. North-Holland linguistic series, 126. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co. Pp. 219–49.
   Google Scholar
• Major, D. 1974. The acquisition of modal auxiliaries in the language of children. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Marckwardt, A. H., and F. Walcott. 1938. Facts about current English usage. New York: Appleton-Century.
   Google Scholar
• Mittins, W. H., M. Salu, M. Edminson, and S. Coyne. 1970. Attitudes to English usage. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, F. R. 1974. The English verb. London: Longmans.
   Google Scholar
• Partridge, E. 1947. Usage and abusage. London: Hamish Hamilton.
   Google Scholar
• Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, and J. Svartvik. 1972. A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longmans.
   Google Scholar
• Quirk, R., and J. Svartvik. 1966. Investigating linguistic acceptability. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C., and G. Meijer. 1977. “On the secondary nature of syntactic intuitions.” In Greenbaum (1977). Pp. 163–77.
   Google Scholar
• Sturtevant, E. H. 1917. Linguistic change: An introduction to the historical study of language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Svartvik, J., and D. Wright. “The use of ought in teenage English.” In Greenbaum (1977). Pp. 179–201.
   Google Scholar
• Treble, H. A., and G. H. Vallins. 1936. A.B.C, of English usage. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallum, M. K. 1973. “The syntax and semantics of English modal verbs from the late tenth to the fifteenth century.” Diss., University of Michigan. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, K. 1978. “Teachers’ attitudes to usage.” Applied Linguistics Association of Australia: Occasional Paper No. 2.
   Google Scholar