Contextual constraints on the use of le and lo in Spanish

REFERENCES

• Bello, Andrés. 1921. Gramática de la lengua castellana destinada al uso de los americanos. Con notas de Rufino José Cuervo. Paris: R. Royer y F. Chernoviz, Editores.
   Google Scholar
• Bolinger, Dwight. 1969. “Of undetermined nouns and indeterminate reflexives.” Romance philology 22:484–89.
   Google Scholar
• Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas. 1973. Boletín informativo de la Comisión de lingüística y dialectología iberoamericanas de PILEI. No. 6 (1975). Madrid: Instituto de Miguel de Cervantes del CSIC.
   Google Scholar
• Diver, William. 1969. “The system of relevance of the Homeric verb.” Acta linguistica hafniensia 12:45–68.
   Google Scholar
• Diver, William. 1975. “Introduction.” Columbia University working papers in linguistics 2:1–25.
   Google Scholar
• García, Erica. 1975. The role of theory in linguistic analysis: The Spanish pronoun system. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• García, Erica. and Ricardo Otheguy. 1977. “Dialect variation in leísmo: A semantic approach.” Studies in language variation: Semantics, syntax, phonology, pragmatics, social situations, ethnographic approaches. Eds. Ralph W. Fasold and Roger W. Shuy. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. Pp. 65–87.
   Google Scholar
• Haden, Emest F., and Joseph H. Matluck. 1973. “El habla culta de la Habana: Análisis fonológico preliminar.” Anuario de letras 11:5–33.
   Google Scholar
• Hurst, Dorothy Ann. 1951, “Influence of subject and connotation of force.” Hispania 34:74–78.
   Google Scholar
• Kany, Charles E. 1964. Sintaxis hispanoamericana. Tr. Martín Blanco Álvarez. Madrid: Editorial Gredos, S.A.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, Paul, and Chad K. McDaniel. 1979. “On the logic of variable rules.” Language and society 8:151–87.
   Google Scholar
• Keniston, Hayward. 1937. Spanish syntax list: A statistical study of grammatical usage in contemporary Spanish prose on the basis of range and frequency. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsner, Robert W. 1969. “The role of zullen in the grammar of Modern Standard Dutch.” Lingua 24:101–54.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, William. 1969. “Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula.” Language 45:715–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lope Blanch, Juan M. 1969. “El proyecto de estudio coordinado de la norma lingüística culta de las principales ciudades de Iberoamérica.” Actas, informes y comunicaciones del Simposio de México. México: Universidad Nacional Autónomo de México. Pp. 222–33.
   Google Scholar
• Lope Blanch, Juan M. 1971. “El estudio del español urbano culto.” Boletín informativo de la Comisión de lingüística y dialectología iberoamericanas de PILEI. No. 4. Madrid: Instituto Miguel de Cervantes del CSIC. Pp. 6–18.
   Google Scholar
• Lope Blanch, Juan M. 1973. Prólogo to Cuestionario para el estudio coordinado de la norma lingüística culta de las principales ciudades de Iberoamérica y de la Península Ibérica. Vol. I: Fonética y fonología. Madrid: Comisión de lingüística iberoamericana (PILEI), Consejo superior de investigaciones científicas (1975). Pp. xi–xvii.
   Google Scholar
• Millard Rosenburg, S. L. 1932. “Three little words we often see.” Modern language journal 16:591–609.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, Thomas. 1978. “Iconicity and lexical retention in Spanish: Stative and dynamic verbs.” Language 54:907–16.
   Google Scholar
• Naro, Anthony J. 1980. Review of Linguistic variation: Models and methods. Ed. David Sankoff. Language 56:158–70.
   Google Scholar
• Naro, Anthony J. 1981. Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey, Marathon M. 1956. A textbook of Modern Spanish as now written and spoken in Castile and the Spanish American republics. Rev. by Robert K. Spaulding. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Real Academia Española. 1973. Esbozo de una nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau, Pascale, and David Sankoff. 1978. “Advances in variable rule methodology.” Linguistic variation: Models and methods. Ed. David Sankoff. New York: Academic Press. Pp. 57–69.
   Google Scholar
• Sankoff, David. 1980. VARBRUL 2S. Unpublished program.
   Google Scholar
• Sankoff, David. 1981. Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidely, Jack. 1971. “Grammaire et statistique: L'alternance le/lo dans l'expression de l'objet pronominal ‘direct’ en espagnol.” Études de linguistique appliqué (N.S.) 6:37–58.
   Google Scholar
• Vallejo-Claros, Bernardo. 1971. La distribución y estratificación de /r/, y /s/ en el español de Cuba. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms.
   Google Scholar
• Zubin, David A. 1972. “The German case system: Exploitation of the dative-accusative opposition for comment.” M.A. thesis, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Zubin, David A. 1975. “On the distributional properties of surface morphology and their consequence for semantic analysis. Columbia University working papers in linguistics 2:189–218.
   Google Scholar