The periphrastic passive construction in Proto-Indo-European

REFERENCES

• Brend, Ruth M. 1968. A tagmemic analysis of Mexican Spanish clauses. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Brugmann, Karl. 1904. Kurze vergleichende Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. Strassburg: Trübner.
   Google Scholar
• Brugmann, Karl. 1916. Grundriss der vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. Vol. 2, Part 3. Strassburg: Trübner.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, Carl D. 1933. Comparative grammar of Greek and Latin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buffington, Albert F. and Preston A. Barba. 1965. A Pennsylvania German grammar. 2nd ed. Allentown, PA; Schlechter's.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, Alston H. and Henry Phillips. 1963. A new introduction to Greek. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, Walter A. 1969. Introduction to tagmemic analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, John R. 1975. “Vestigal substantival adverbs and ‘prepositionalization’ in Old Frisian.” Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 76: 651–670.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, John R. 1977. A generative grammar of Old Frisian. Bern: Lang Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, John R. 1982. “The absolute construction in Indo-European: A syntagmemic reconstruction.” The journal of Indo-European studies 10: 235–252.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, John R. 1983. Syntactic change and syntactic reconstruction: A tagmemic approach. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas at Arlington.
   Google Scholar
• Curme, George O. 1931. A grammar of the English language. Vol. II. Syntax. Boston: D. C. Heath.
   Google Scholar
• Curme, George O. 1947. English grammar. New York: Barnes and Noble.
   Google Scholar
• D'Ooge, Benjamin L. 1921. Elements of Latin. Boston: Ginn.
   Google Scholar
• Du Mont, Francis M. 1950. French grammar. 2nd ed. New York: Barnes and Noble.
   Google Scholar
• Fillmore, Charles T. 1968. “The case for case.” Universals in linguistic theory. Eds. Emmon Bach and Robert T. Harms. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Pp. 1–88.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, Johannes. 1974. Hethitisches Elementarbuch. Part 1. Kurzgefasste Grammatik. 3rd ed. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, Paul. 1975. Proto-Indo-European syntax. The order of meaningful elements. Butte, MT: The Journal of Indo-European Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, William W. and Charles B. Gulick. 1930. Greek grammar. Boston: Ginn.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, Joseph H. 1957. Essays in linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966. “Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements.” Universals of language. Ed. Joseph H. Greenberg. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press. Pp. 73–113.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, Austin. 1976. “The relationship of tagmemic theory to rules, derivation, and transformational grammar.” Tagmemics. Vol. 2. Theoretical discussion. Eds. Ruth M. Brend and Kenneth L. Pike. The Hague: Mouton. Pp. 51–89.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, Zellig S. 1952. “Discourse analysis.” Language 28: 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, Zellig S. 1960. Structural linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Rpt. of 1st ed., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1947.)
   Google Scholar
• Heller, Louis G. and James Macris. 1967. “Perspectives in functionalism.” Word 23: 288–299.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, Louis G. and James Macris. 1979. “Parameters: Reactance as analytic tool and evidence.” Word 30: 205–213.
   Google Scholar
• Hirt, Hermann. 1927. Indogermanische Grammatik. Vol. III. Heidelberg: Carl Winter's Universitätsbuchhandlung.
   Google Scholar
• Hirt, Hermann. 1928. Indogermanische Grammatik. Vol. IV. Heidelberg: Carl Winter's Universitätsbuchhandlung.
   Google Scholar
• Hirt, Hermann. 1932. Handbuch des Urgermanischen. Vol. II. Heidelberg: Carl Winter's Universitätsbuchhandlung.
   Google Scholar
• Hoenigswald, Henry M. 1960. Language change and linguistic reconstruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jespersen, Otto. 1969. Analytic syntax. Transatlantic series in linguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. (Rpt. of 1st ed., London: Allen and Unwin, 1937.)
   Google Scholar
• Krahe, Hans, 1963. Indogermanische Sprachwissenschaft. Vol. II. Formenlehre. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Kronasser, Heinz. 1955. Vergleichende Laut- und Formenlehre des Hethitischen. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.
   Google Scholar
• La Grone, Gregory G. 1957. Basic conversational Spanish. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, Winfred P. 1974. Proto-Indo-European syntax. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, William B. 1968. Historical German syntax. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, William B. 1969. Indo-European philology. London: Hutchinson University Library.
   Google Scholar
• Longacre, Robert E. 1960. “String constituent analysis.” Language 36: 63–88.
   Google Scholar
• Longacre, Robert E. 1964. Grammar discovery procedures. Afield manual. Janua linguarum, 33. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Longacre, Robert E. 1966. “Trique clause and sentence: A study in contrast, variation, and distribution.” International journal of American linguistics 32: 242–252.
   Google Scholar
• Mayrhofer, Manfred. 1965. Sanskrit-Grammatik. 2nd ed. Berlin: Walterde Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, Henri F. and Pauline Taylor. 1932. A chrestomathy of Vulgar Latin. Boston: D. C. Heath.
   Google Scholar
• Pike, Kenneth L. 1972. “Dimensions of grammatical constructions.” Kenneth L. Pike. Selected writings. Ed. Ruth M. Brend. Series maior, 55. The Hague: Mouton. Pp. 160–186. (Rpt. from Language 38: 221–244, 1962).
   Google Scholar
• Pike, Kenneth L. and Evelyn G. Pike. 1977. Grammatical analysis. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas at Arlington.
   Google Scholar
• Pollard, Cecil Vivian. 1950. The key to German translation. Austin, TX: The University Cooperative Society.
   Google Scholar
• Prokosch, Eduard. 1939. A comparative Germanic grammar. Philadelphia: Linguistic Society of America and University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Purin, Charles M. and Ernst Rose. 1928. Deutsche Kulturkunde. A cultural reader. New York: Johnson Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Quirk, Randolph and C. L. Wrenn. 1957. An Old English grammar. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Ramat, Paolo, ed. 1980. Linguistic reconstruction and Indo-European syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins B. V.
   Google Scholar
• Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language. New York: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Schinnerer, Otto P. 1936. Continuing German. New York: The Macmillan Co.
   Google Scholar
• Senn, Alfred. 1966. Handbuch der litauischen Sprache. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Streitberg, Wilhelm. 1960. Die gotische Bibel. Part 1. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag. (Rpt. of 2nd ed., Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag, 1919.)
   Google Scholar
• Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1972. A history of English syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Vos, B. J. 1941. Concise German grammar. New York: Henry Holt and Co.
   Google Scholar