REFERENCES
- Antal, L. 1971. “Some remarks on a controversial issue,” Lingua 26, 171–180.
- Antal, L. 1976. “Psychologismus und Objektivismus in der Sprachwissenschaft,” In Jazayery, M. A., E. C. Polomé, and W. Winter Eds.: Linguistic and literary studies in honorof Archibald A. Hill 1. Lisse: Peter de Ridder Press. pp. 19–29.
- Bloomfield, L. 1933. Language. New York: H. Holt.
- Bolinger, D. 1965. “The atomization of meaning,” Language, 41: 555–73.
- Chomsky, N. 1964. “Current issues in linguistic theory.” In Fodor-Katz, 1964: 50–118.
- Chomsky, N. 1968. Language and mind. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
- Derwing, B. L. 1973. Transformational grammar as a theory of language acquisition. Cambridge: University Press.
- Devismes, B. 1971. “Entretien avec André Martinet,” Le Monde, 15 janvier.
- Esper, E. A. 1973. Analogy and association in linguistics and psychology. Athens: Univ. of Georgia Press.
- Fodor, J. A. and J. J. Katz, Eds. 1964. The structure of language: Readings in the philosophy of language. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
- Hockett, Ch. F. 1968. The state of the art. The Hague: Mouton.
- Imhasly, B. 1974. Der Begriff der sprachlichen Kreativität in der neueren Linguistik. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
- Itkonen, E. 1978. Grammatical theory and metascknce. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Kac, M. B. 1974. “Autonomous linguistics and psycholinguistics.” Minnesota working papers in linguistics and philosophy of language, 2: 42–47.
- Katz, J. J. 1981. Language and other abstract objects. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Katz, J. J. and J. A. Fodor 1963. “The structure of a semantic theory.” Language, 39: 170–210.
- Lakoff, G. 1969. “Review of Hockett 1968,” Foundations of language 5: 118–127.
- Paul, H. 1909. Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Niemeyer.