Logic and interpretation: Norm and polyseme

REFERENCES

• Aristotle. 1941. Metaphysics, in The basic works of Aristotle. Ed. Richard McKeon, Tr. W. D. Ross. N.Y.: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1966. Course in general linguistics. Ed. C. Bally and A. Sechehaye in collaboration with A. Riedlinger. Tr. Wade Baskin. Toronto: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Huertas-Jourda, Jose. 1984. Essays in memory of Aron Qurwitsch: 1983. Ed. Lester Embree. Current continental research, no. 007. Washington, D.C.: Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology and University Press of America. Pp. 195–211.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, Edmund. 1970a. The crisis in European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy. Tr. David Carr. Northwestern University studies in phenomenology and existential philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, Edmund. 1970b. Logical investigations. 2 vols. Tr. J. N. Findlay. New York: Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, Edmund. 1973. Experience and judgement: Investigations in a genealogy of logic. Rev. and Ed. Ludwig Landgrebe. Tr. J. S. Churchill and K. Ameriks. Northwestern University studies in phenomenology and existential philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl, Edmund. 1982. Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: First book. General introduction to a pure phenomenology. Tr. Fred Kersten. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. 2nd ed. International encyclopedia of unified science, vol. 2, no. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S. 1977. The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, Paul, 1965. “Objectivity and subjectivity in history.” History and truth. Tr. Charles A. Kelbley. Northwestern university studies in phenomenology and existential philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, Paul 1967. Husserl: An analysis of his phenomenology. Northwestern University studies in existentialism and phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, Paul 1971. “The model of the text: meaningful action considered as a text.” Social Research 28: 529–62.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, Paul 1974a. “Heidegger and the question of the subject.” The conflict of interpretations. Ed. Don Ihde. Northwestern University studies in phenomenology and existential philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. Pp. 223–35.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, Paul 1974b. “Structure, word, event.” The conflict of interpretations. Ed. Don Ihde. Northwestern University studies in phenomenology and existential philosophy. Evanston: Northwestern University Press. Ppr 79–96.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, Paul 1976. Interpretation theory: Discourse and the theory of meaning. Ft. Worth: Texas Christian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, Paul 1977. The rule of metaphor: Multi-disciplinary studies of the creation of meaning in language. Tr. Robert Czerny, with Kathleen McLaughlin and John Costello, S. J. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, Paul 1978a. “Creativity in language: word, polyseme, metaphor.” The philosophy of Paul Ricoeur: An anthology of his work. Eds. Charles E. Reagan and David Stewart. Boston: Beacon Press. Pp. 120–33.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, Paul 1978b. “Explanation and understanding: On some remarkable connections among the theory of the text, theory of action, and theory of history.” The philosophy of Paul Ricoeur: An anthology of his work. Eds. Charles E. Reagan and David Stewart. Boston: Beacon Press. Pp. 149–68.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, Paul 1981a. “Appropriation.” Hermeneutics and the human sciences: Essays on language, action and interpretation. Tr. and Ed. John B. Thompson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 182–93.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, Paul 1981b. “The hermeneutical function of distanciation.” Hermeneutics and the human sciences: Essays on language, action and interpretation. Tr. and Ed. John B. Thompson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 131–44.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, Paul 1981c. “The task of hermeneutics.” Hermeneutics and the human sciences: Essays on language, action and interpretation. Tr. and Ed. John B. Thompson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 43–62.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, Paul 1981d. “Metaphor and the central problem of hermeneutics.” Hermeneutics and the human sciences: Essays on language, action and interpretation. Tr. and Ed. John B. Thompson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 165–81.
   Google Scholar