331
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The transitivity prototype: evidence from Hindi

Pages 187-199 | Published online: 16 Jun 2015

REFERENCES

  • Bahl, Kali Charan. 1974. Studies in the semantic structure of Hindi. Delhi: Motitlal Banarsidass.
  • Davison, Alice. 1969. “Reflexivization and movement rules in relation to a class of psychological predicates,” Papers from the 5th regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society. Chicago: CLS. pp. 37–51.
  • Dixon, R.M.W. 1979. “Ergativity,” Language 55: 59–138.
  • Hock, Hans H. 1985. “Transitivity as a gradient feature? Evidence from Indo-Aryan, especially Sanskrit and Hindi,” Proceedings of the conference on participant roles: South Asia and adjacent areas (Ancillary meeting to the CLS 1984 meeting). Eds. Arlene Zide, David Magier and Eric Schiller. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club. pp. 257–63.
  • Hook, Peter E. 1976. “Some syntactic reflexes of sub-categories of agent in Hindi,” The notion of subject in South Asian languages. ed. Manindra K. Verma. Madison: University of Wisconsin South Asian Studies. pp. 65–78.
  • Hook, Peter E. 1985. “Coexistent analyses and participant roles in Indo-Aryan,” Proceedings of the conference on participant roles: South Asia and adjacent areas (Ancillary meeting to the CLS 1984 meeting). Eds. Arlene Zide, David Magier and Eric Schiller. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club. pp. 264–83.
  • Hook, Peter E. (forthcoming). “Differential s-marking in Marathi, Hindi-Urdu and Kashmiri,” Papers from the 23rd regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society. Chicago: CLS.
  • Hopper, Paul and Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. “Transitivity in grammar and discourse,” Language 56: 251–99.
  • Junghare, I. 1983. “Markers of definiteness in Indo-Aryan,” Proceedings of the 9th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society. pp. 116–27.
  • Kachru, Yamuna. 1970. “The syntax of the ko-sentences in Hindi.” Papers in Linguistics 2. 2: 299–316.
  • Magier, David. 1983. Topics in the grammar of Marwari. Berkeley: University of California unpublished Ph.D. dissertation.
  • Magier, David. 1984. “Transitivity and valence: some lexical processes in Marwari,” Proceedings of the 10th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society. Berkeley: BLS. pp. 206–19.
  • Magier, David. 1985. “Case and transitivity in Marwari,” Proceedings of the conference on participant roles: South Asia and adjacent areas (Ancillary meeting to the CLS 1984 meeting). Eds. Arlene Zide, David Magier and Eric Schiller. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club. pp. 149–59.
  • Masica, Colin. 1976. Defining a linguistic area: South Asia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Masica, Colin. 1981. “Identified object marking in Hindi and other languages,” Topics in Hindi linguistics, volume 2. ed. Omkar N. Koul. New Delhi: Bahri Publications. pp. 16–50.
  • Pandharipande, Rajeshwari. 1981. “Exceptions and rule government: the case of passive rule in Hindi,” Topics in Hindi linguistics, volume 2. ed. Omkar N. Koul. New Delhi: Bahri Publications. pp. 93–121.
  • Saksena, Anuradha. 1980. “The affected agent,” Language 51. 3: 753–60.
  • Silverstein, Michael. 1976. “Hierarchy of features and ergativity,” Grammatical categories in Australian languages. ed. R.M.W. Dixon. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies. pp. 112–71.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.