Genealogical linguistics: Progress and pitfalls

REFERENCES

• Bateman, Richard, Ives Goddard, Richard O’Grady, V. A. Funk, Rich Mooi, W. John Kress, and Peter Cannell. 1990. “Speaking of forked tongues. The feasibility of reconciling human phylogeny and the history of language.” Current anthropology 31:1-24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bichakjian, Bernard H. 1987. “The evolution of word order: A paedomorphic explanation.” Papers from the Seventh international conference on historical linguistics. Eds. Anna Giacalone Ramat, Onofrio Carruba and Giuliano Bernini. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Pp. 87-107.
   Google Scholar
• Bichakjian, Bernard H. 1988a. Evolution in language. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.
   Google Scholar
• Bichakjian, Bernard H. 1988b. “*J’ai tombé pour je suis tombé: L’aboutissement d’une longue évolution.” Aspects de linguistique française. Hommage à Q.I.M. Mok. Ed. Ronald Landheer. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Pp. 31-48.
   Google Scholar
• Bichakjian, Bernard H. 1990. “Language change: Cyclical or linear? The case of the Romance future.” Historical linguistics 1987. Papers from the Eighth international conference on historical linguistics. Eds. Henning Andersen and Konrad Koerner. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Pp. 37-49.
   Google Scholar
• Bichakjian, Bernard H. 1991. “Evolutionary patterns in linguistics.” Studies in language origins, II. Eds. Walburga von Raffler-Engel and Jan Wind. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Pp. 187-224.
   Google Scholar
• Bonfante, Giuliano. 1939. “Les lois du développement linguistique.” Réponses au questionnaire (suite) du Cinquième congrès international des linguistes, Bruxelles, 1939. Bruges: Imprimerie Sainte Catherine. Pp. 31-32.
   Google Scholar
• Cavalli-Sforza, Luigi Luca, Alberto Piazza, Paolo Menozzi, and Joanna Mountain. 1988. “Reconstruction of human evolution: Bringing together genetic, archaeological, and linguistic data.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 85:6002-06.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collinder, Björn. 1936. “Analytische Sprachentwicklung und linguistische Teleologie.” Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 50.51-63.
   Google Scholar
• Bichakjian, Bernard H. 1956. “Die Entstehung der Sprache.” Ural-Altäische Jahrbücher 28:116-27.
   Google Scholar
• Excoffier, Laurent, Rosalind M. Harding, Robert R. Sokal, Beatrice Pellegrini, and Alicia Sanchez-Mazas. 1991. “Spatial differentiation of Rhesus and Gm haplotype frequencies in Sub-Saharan Africa and its relation to linguistic affinities.” Human biology 63:273-307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamkrelidze, Thomas V. and VjaCeslav V. Ivanov. 1973. “Sprachtypologie und die Rekonstruktion der gemeinindogermanischen Verschlüsse.” Phonetica 27:150-6 [first published in Russian in Working papers of the Conference on the comparative grammar of the Indo-European languages. Moscow, 1972].
   Google Scholar
• Gamkrelidze, Thomas V. 1985. “The ancient Near East and the Indo-European question: Temporal and territorial characteristics of Proto-Indo-European based on linguistic and historic-cultural data. ’ ’ Journal of Indo-European studies 13:3-48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Givön, Talmy. 1979. On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, Stephen J. 1977. Ontogeny and phytogeny. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, Stephen J. 1988. “On replacing the idea of progress with an operational notion of directionality.” In Nitecki, ed. Pp. 319-38.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, Joseph H. 1957. “The nature and uses of linguistic typologies.” International journal of American linguistics 23:68-77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobson, Roman. 1958. “Typological studies and their contribution to historical comparative linguistics.” Proceedings of the Eighth international congress of linguists, Oslo, 1957. Ed. Eva Sivertsen. Oslo: Univ. Press. Pp. 17-35 [also in Selected writings. The Hague: Mouton, 1962. I, 523-32].
   Google Scholar
• Jespersen, Otto. 1964. Language: its nature, development, and origin. New York: Norton [first publ. in 1922. London: Allen and Unwin; New York: Holt].
   Google Scholar
• Johanson, Donald, and James Shreeve. 1989. Lucy’s child: The discovery of a human ancestor. New York: Avon.
   Google Scholar
• Leroy, Maurice. 1950. Sur le concept d’évolution en linguistique. Bruxelles: Office de Publicité [originally publ. in Revue de l’Institut de Sociologie, 3 (1949):337—76].
   Google Scholar
• LeVay, Simon, Torsten N. Wiesel, and David H. Hubel. 1980. “The development of ocular dominance columns in normal and visually deprived monkeys.” The journal of comp, neurology 191:1-51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin, Roger. 1987. Bones of contention: Controversies in the search for human origins. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenz, Konrad. 1971. Studies in animal and human behaviour. Vol. 2. Tr. Robert Martin. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Malmberg, Bertil. 1968. Les nouvelles tendances de la linguistique. Tr. Jacques Gengoux. 2nd ed. Paris: PUF [original: Nya vügar inom sprakforskningen. En orientering i modem lingvistik. Stockholm: Svenska Bokförlaget, 1962],
   Google Scholar
• Manaster-Ramer, Alexis. 1989. “Language, history and computation (preliminary report).” Reconstructing languages and cultures. Ed. Vitaly Shevoroshkin. Bochum: Brockmeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Meillet, Antoine. 1964. Introduction à l’étude comparative des langues indo-européennes. University, AL: Univ. of Alabama Press [a rpt. of the 8th ed. Paris: Hachette, 1937].
   Google Scholar
• Meillet, Antoine. 1965. “Convergences des développements linguistiques.” Linguistique historique et linguistique générale. 2nd ed. Paris: Champion. Pp. 61-75 [first publ. in Revue Philosophique 85 (1918)].
   Google Scholar
• Nitecki, Matthew H., ed. 1988. Evolutionary progress? Chicago: The Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polomé, Edgar C. 1982. The Indo-Europeans in the fourth and third millennia. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.
   Google Scholar
• Rudwick, Martin J.S. 1975. “Caricature as a source for the history of science: De la Beche’s anti-Lyellian sketches of 1831.” Isis 66:534-60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruhlen, Merritt. 1987. A guide to the world’s languages. Vol. 1. Classification. Stanford, CA: UP.
   Google Scholar
• Ruse, Michael. 1988. “Molecules to men: Evolutionary biology and thoughts on progress.” In Nitecki, ed. Pp. 97-126.
   Google Scholar
• Sapir, Edward. 1949. Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World [first published in 1921].
   Google Scholar
• Schleicher, August. 1852. Les langues de l’Europe moderne. Tr. Hermann Ewerbeck. Paris: Ladrange and Garnier [German original: Die Sprachen Europas in systematischer Übersicht. Bonn: König, 1850; also published as vol. II of Sprachvergleichende Untersuchungen. Bonn: König, 1848-50].
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon, Amy Louise. 1972. “The acquisition of relative clauses in English.” Doctoral Diss. The Univ. of Texas at Austin.
   Google Scholar
• Stephany, Ursula. 1981. Aspekt, Tempus und Modalität: Eine Studie der Entwicklung der Verbalgrammatik in der neugriechischen Kindersprache. 2 vols. Preprint version [Stephany’s research is reported in part in “Modality.” Language acquisition: Studies in first language development. 2nd ed. Eds. Paul Fletcher and Michael Garman. Cambridge, The Univ. Press, 1986. Pp. 375-400],
   Google Scholar
• Wright, Robert. 1991. “Quest for the mother tongue.” The Atlantic monthly 267 No 4 (April): 39-68.
   Google Scholar