What’s in a word?: On integrating recent approaches to secondary associations, submorphemic units and morphological segmentation

REFERENCES

• Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word formation in generative grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, Leonard. 1911. “Review of indo-european ax:axi:axu. A study in ablaut and in wordformation, by Francis A. Wood.” JEGP 10:628-31.
   Google Scholar
• Aronoff, Mark. 1933. Language. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, Morton W. 1953. “Final root-forming morphemes.” American Speech 15:158-64.
   Google Scholar
• Blust, Robert A. 1988. An austronesian root dictionary. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Bolinger, Dwight. 1950. “Rime, assonance and morpheme analysis.” WORD 6:117-36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolinger, Dwight. 1975. Aspects of language. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, Charles Darling. 1949. A dictionary of selected synonyms in the principle indo-european languages. A contribution to the history of ideas. Chicago: The University Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bülbring, Karl Daniel. 1902. Altenglisches Elementarbuch. vol. 1. Lautlehre. Sammlung germanischer Elementarbücher, 1.4. Heidelberg: Winter.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology. A study of the relation between meaning and form. Typological Studies in Language, 9. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, Joan L. and Carol Lynn Moder. 1983. “Morphological classes as natural categories.” Language 59:251-70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, Joan L. and Dan I. Slobin. 1982. “Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense.” Language 58:265-89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bynon, Theodora. 1977. Historical linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, Frederic G. 1983. “The Intensive prefix ker-.” American Speech 58:291-302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Gerald. 1976. “Origin of ker- in kerflop, kerchunk, etc.” Comments on Etymology 6:1-24.
   Google Scholar
• Dauzat, Albert. 1946. “Attraction paronymique dans le français contemporain.” Études de linguistique française. Ed. Albert Dauzat. Paris: Éditions d’Artrey. Pp. 253-61.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Garry W. 1991. “Some apparent cases of submorphemic attractions in early Dutch and the older Germanic languages.” Berkeley Dutch Linguistics Conference 1989. Ed. Thomas F. Shannon and Johan Snapper. Lanham, MD.: University Press of America. Pp. 13-33.
   Google Scholar
• Firth, J.R. 1964. The tongues of men and speech. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Georgacas, Demetrius. 1982. A graeco-slavic controversial problem reexamined: the -its- suffixes in Byzantine, Medieval, and Modern Greek. Their Origin and ethnological implications. Athens: Academy of Athens.
   Google Scholar
• Givón, Talmy. 1984. Syntax. A functional-typological introduction, vol. 1. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Haiman, John, forthcoming. “Ritualization.” Explanation in Historical Linguistics. Eds. G.W. Davis & G.K. Iverson, Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, No. 84, Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Hock, Hans Henrich. 1986. Principles of historical linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, Paul J. 1990. “Where do words come from?” Studies in typology and diachrony. Eds. William Croft, Keith Denning and Suzanne Kemmer. Typological studies in language series, 20. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Pp. 151-60.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, Paul J. forthcoming. “Phonogenesis.” Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Linguistics Symposium, University of Wisconsin- Milwaukee. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Householder, Fred W. 1946. “On the problem of sound meaning: an English phonestheme.” WORD 2:83-84.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, Brian D. 1987. “On the use of iconic elements in etymological investigation. Some case studies from Greek.” Diachronica 4(1/2): 1-26.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, Brian. 1989. “Competition and lexical categorization.” Linguistic categorization. Eds. Roberta Corrigan, Fred Eckman, and Michael Noonan. Current issues in linguistic theory, 61. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Pp.195-241.
   Google Scholar
• Marchand, Hans. 1969. The categories and types of present-day english word-formation. A synchronic- diachronic approach. Munich: Beck.
   Google Scholar
• Markel, N.N. and E.P. Hamp. 1960-61. “Connotative meanings of certain phoneme sequences.” Studies in Linguistics 15:47-61.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, James A. H., Henry Bradley, W.A. Craigie and C.T. Onions. 1989. The Oxford English dictionary. Ed. J.A. Simpson and E.S.C. Weiner. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Nida, Eugene A. 1949. Morphology. The descriptive analysis of words. 2nd ed. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Partridge, Eric. 1984. Dictionary of slang and unconventional English: colloquialisms and catch-phrases, colecisms and catachreses, nicknames and vulgarisms. Ed. Paul Beale. 8th ed. New York: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pike, Kenneth L. 1943. “Taxemes and immediate constituents.” Language 19:65-82.
   Google Scholar
• Pound, Louise. 1931. “American indefinite names.” American Speech 6:257-59.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, Richard A. and John M. Lawler. 1981. “Athematic metaphors.” CLS 17:318-42.
   Google Scholar
• Rosch, Eleanor. 1978. “Principles of categorization.” Cognition and categorization. Eds. E. Rosch and B. Lloyd. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum. Pp. 27-48.
   Google Scholar
• Rosch, Eleanor and Carolyn B. Mervis. 1975. “Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories.” Cognitive Psychology 7:573-605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wescott, Roger W. 1976. “Allolinguistics: Exploring the peripheries of speech.” The second LACUS forum 1975. Ed. Peter A. Reich. Columbia, SC: Hornbeam. Pp. 497-513.
   Google Scholar
• Wescott, Roger W. 1987. “Holesthemes or phonesthemes twice over.” General Linguistics 27(2):67-72.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Zelinsky-Wibbelt, Carnelia. 1983. “Voraussetzungen zu einer Untersuchung der semantischen Belastung von submorphematischen Einheiten im Englischen.” Sprache, Diskurs, und Text. Eds. René Jongen, Sabine De Knop, Peter H. Neide, and Marie-Paule Quix. Linguistische Arbeiten, 133. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Pp. 28-38.
   Google Scholar