How does the lexicon work?*

REFERENCES

• Bloomfield, Leonard. 1909–10. “A semasiological differentiation in Germanic Secondary Ablaut” (University of Chicago PhD Dissertation). Modern philology 7: 245-88; 345-82. Reprinted (excerpt only) in A Leonard Bloomfield anthology. Ed. Charles F. Hockett. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 1970. 1-6.
   Google Scholar
• Bolinger, Dwight W. 1940. “Word affinities.” American speech 15: 69-70.
   Google Scholar
• Bolinger, Dwight W. 1949. “The sign is not arbitrary.” Boletin del Instituto Caro y Cuervo 5: 52-62.
   Google Scholar
• Bolinger, Dwight W. 1950a. “Chiviarri and the phonestheme.” American speech 25: 134-35.
   Google Scholar
• Bolinger, Dwight W. 1950b. “Rime, assonance, and morpheme analysis.” WORD 6: 117-36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass:M.I.T. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, Jacques. 1988. Limited Inc. Evanston, Ill: Northwestern Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Firth, J.R. 1930. Speech. London: Ernest Benn. Reprinted in Firth, J.R. 1966. Tongues of Men; and Speech. London: Oxford Univ. Press. 89-114.
   Google Scholar
• Fok Chan Yuen Yuen, Angela. 1979. “The frequency of occurrence of speech sounds and tones in Cantonese.” Hong Kong language papers. Ed. Robert Lord. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Univ. Press. 150-57.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, W. Terrence. 1978. “Morphosemantics: A neglected chapter in linguistics.” Glossa 12(1):3-15.
   Google Scholar
• Guiraud, Pierre. 1960. “Le champ morphosémantique du verbe chiquer.” Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 55(1): 134-54.
   Google Scholar
• Guiraud, Pierre. 1965. “Les structures élémentaires de la signification.” Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 60(1): 97-114.
   Google Scholar
• Guiraud, Pierre. 1966. “Le champ morpho-sémantique des noms du chat.” Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 61(1): 128-45.
   Google Scholar
• Guiraud, Pierre. 1967. Structures étymologiques du lexique français. Paris: Larousse.
   Google Scholar
• Hashimoto, Oi Kwan Yue. 1972. Studies in Yue dialects (1): The phonology of Cantonese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hockett, Charles F. 1958. A course in modern linguistics. New York: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Householder, Fred W. 1946. “On the problem of sound and meaning: An English phonestheme.” WORD 2: 83-84.
   Google Scholar
• Hymes, Dell. 1960. “Phonological aspects of style: Some English sonnets.” Style in language. Ed. Thomas A. Sebeok. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press. 109-31.
   Google Scholar
• Hymes, Dell. 1964. Language in culture and society. New York, Evanston and London: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Alex I. 1978. “Form and meaning in an Australian language.” Language and speech 21: 264-78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karcevskij, Sergei. 1929. “Du dualisme asymétrique du signe linguistique.” Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 1: 33-38.
   Google Scholar
• Kurilovich, Jerzy. 1955. “Zametki o znachenii slova.” Voprosy iazykoinaniia 3: 73-81.
   Google Scholar
• Levi, Judith N. 1978. The syntax and semantics of complex nominals. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, Robert. 1966. “Complex homonymy in English lexical and semantic structure.” Studia Linguistica 20(1): 17-42.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, Robert. 1970a. “A new concept in structural linguistics.” Actes du Xe Congres International des Linguistes. Ed. Alexandra Graur. Vol. 2. Bucharest: Editions de l’Academie de la Republique Socialiste de Roumanie, pp. 433-41.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, Robert. 1970b. “Lexico-semantic categories.” Studia Linguistica 24(1): 17-42.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, Robert & Chang, Tsong Zung. 1987. “Morphosemantic categories in Chinese: An interim report.” Journal of the Atlantic Provinces Linguistic Association 9: 123-57.
   Google Scholar
• Markel, Norman & Hamp, Eric P. 1961. “Connotative meanings of certain phonetic sequences.” Studies in linguistics 15: 47-61.
   Google Scholar
• McCune, Keith M. 1985. The internal structure of Indonesian roots. Linguistic studies of Indonesian and other languages in Indonesia, 21-22. Jakarta: NUSA.
   Google Scholar
• Miron, Murray S. 1961. “A cross-linguistic investigation of phonetic symbolism.” Journal of abnormal and social psychology 62: 623-30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, Richard & Lawler, John. 1981. “Athematic metaphors.” Papers from the Seventeenth Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Eds. Roberta A. Hendrick, Carrie S. Masek & Mary F. Miller. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, John et. al (Eds.). 1987. Collins Cobuild English Language Dictionary (developed and compiled in the University of Birmingham). London and Glasgow: Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Weinreich, Uriel. 1966. “Explorations in semantic theory.” Current trends in Linguistics. Ed. Thomas A. Sebeok. The Hague: Mouton. 395-478.
   Google Scholar
• Wescott, Roger W. 1987. “Holesthemes or phonesthemes twice over.” General Linguistics 27(2): 67-72.
   Google Scholar