Comparative Afroasiatic and General Genetic Linguistics

REFERENCES

• Applegate, J. R. 1970. “The Berber Languages,” in Sebeok 1970:586-661.
   Google Scholar
• Barreteau, D. and P. Newman. 1978. “Les langues tchadiques,” Inventaire des études linguistiques sur les pays d’afrique noire d’expression française et sur Madagascar. Ed. D. Barreteau. Paris: Conseil International de la Langue Française. Pp. 291-330.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, G. A. 1934. Semitic and Hamitic Origins. Philadelphia & London: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press & Oxford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Basset, A. 1952. La langue berbère (Handbook of African Languages). London: Oxford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bender, M. L., Ed. 1976. The Non-Semitic Languages of Ethiopia (Committee on Ethiopian Studies, Occasional Papers Series 5). East Lansing, MI: Michigan State Univ., African Studies Center.
   Google Scholar
• Bendor-Samuel, J. 1986. “Niger-Congo Today.” Language in Global Perspective: Papers in Honor of the 50th Anniversary of the Summer Institute of Linguistics 1935–1985. Ed. B. F. Elson. Dallas: SIL. Pp. 587-99.
   Google Scholar
• Benfey, T. 1869. Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft und orientalischen Philologie in Deutschland. Munich: Gotta’sche Buchhandlung.
   Google Scholar
• Bergsträsser, G. 1928. Einführung in die semitischen Sprachen: Textproben und grammatische Skizzen. Munich: Max Hueber Verlag. Translated with Notes and Bibliography and an Appendix on the Scripts. 1983 by P. T. Daniels. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns.
   Google Scholar
• Braukämper, U. 1986. “Oromo Country of Origin: A Reconsideration of Hypotheses,” in Goldenberg 1986:25-40.
   Google Scholar
• Brockelmann, C. 1908–13. Grundriß der vergleichenden Grammatik der semitischen Sprachen (2 vols.). Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Burrini, G. 1978. “Profilo storico degli studi sul camito-semitico.” Istituto Orientale di Napoli Annali 38:113-53.
   Google Scholar
• Burrini, G. 1979. “Profilo storico degli studi sul camito-semitico. II.” Istituto Orientale di Napoli Annali 39:351-84.
   Google Scholar
• Bynon, J., Ed. 1984. Current Progress in Afro-Asiatic Linguistics: Papers of the Third International Hamito-Semitic Congress (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science IV: Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 28). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Bynon, J. and T. Bynon, Eds. 1975. Hamito-Semitica: Proceedings of a Colloquium Held by the Historical Section of the Linguistics Association (Great Britain) at the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, on the 18th, 19th and 20th of March 1970 (Janua Linguarum Series Practica 200). The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, L. 1988. Review of Greenberg 1987. Language 64:591-615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantineau, J. 1960. Etudes de linguistique arabe: mémorial Jean Cantineau. Paris: Klincksieck.
   Google Scholar
• Caquot, A. and D. Cohen, Eds. 1974. Actes du premier congrès international de linguistique chamito-sémitique, Paris 16–19 juillet 1969 (Janua Linguarum Series Practica 159). The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. 1970–76. Dictionnaire des racines sémitiques ou attestées dans les langues sémitiques, Comprenant un fichier de J. Cantineau. Paris: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. 1984. La phrase nominale et l’évolution du système verbal en sémitique: études de syntaxe historique (Collection linguistique). Paris: Société de Linguistique de Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D., Ed. 1988. Les langues chamito-sémitiques (Les langues dans le monde ancien et moderne 3). Paris: Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
   Google Scholar
• Comrie, B. 1989. “Genetic classification, contact, and variation.” GURT 1988. Pp. 81-93.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, P. T. 1978. Review of Caquot and Cohen 1974. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 37:358-362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, P. T. 1989. “‘Proto-Euphratic’ and the Syllabic Origin of Writing.” Proceedings Eastern Great Lakes and Midwest Biblical Societies 9:23-29.
   Google Scholar
• Delafosse, M. 1914. Esquisse générale des langues de l’Afrique et plus particulièrement de l’Afrique française. Paris: Masson.
   Google Scholar
• Diakonoff, I. M. 1965. Semito-Hamitic Languages. Moscow: NAUKA.
   Google Scholar
• Diakonoff, I. M. 1974. “Hamito-Semitic Languages.” Encyclopedia Britannica 15th ed. Macropœdia 8:589-98.
   Google Scholar
• Diakonoff, I. M. 1975. “Opening Address,” in Bynon and Bynon 1975:25-39.
   Google Scholar
• Diakonoff, I. M. 1984. “Letter to the Conference,” in Bynon 1984:1-10.
   Google Scholar
• Diakonoff, I. M. 1988. Afrasian languages (Languages of Asia and Africa). Moscow: NAUKA.
   Google Scholar
• Dolgopolsky, A. B. 1973. Sravitelno-istoričeskaja fonetika kušitskix jazykov. Moscow: NAUKA.
   Google Scholar
• Ehret, C. 1987. “Proto-Cushitic reconstruction.” SUG1A—Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 8:7-180.
   Google Scholar
• Ehret, C. 1989 [1990]. “The Origin of Third Consonants in Semitic Roots: An Internal Reconstruction (Applied to Arabic).” Journal of Afroasiatic Languages 2:109-202.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, H. C. 1983. “Chadic External Relations,” Wolff and Meyer-Bahlburg 1983:17-31.
   Google Scholar
• Fodor, I. 1982. A Fallacy of Contemporary Linguistics: J. H. Greenberg’s Classification of the African Languages and His “Comparative Method” 4th ed. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.
   Google Scholar
• Fronzaroli, P., Ed. 1978. Atti del secondo congresso internazionale di linguistica camito-semitica, Firenze, 16–19 aprile 1974 (Quaderni di Semitistica 5). Florence: Università di Firenze, Istituto di Linguistica e di Lingue Orientali.
   Google Scholar
• Galand, L. 1960. “Berbers. 5. Language,” Encyclopaedia of Islam 1:1180-1185.
   Google Scholar
• Galand, L. 1983. “Berbère,” in Cohen 1988:207-42.
   Google Scholar
• Garbini, G. 1972. Le lingue semitiche: studi di storia linguistica (Pubblicazioni del Seminario di Semitistica Ricerche 9). Naples: Istituto Orientale di Napoli.
   Google Scholar
• Gardiner, A. 1957. Egyptian Grammar 3rd ed. London: Oxford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, I. 1986. “Sapir’s Comparative Method,” New Perspectives in Language, Culture and Personality (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science III, Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 41). Eds. W. Cowan, M. K. Foster, and K. Koerner. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Pp. 191-214.
   Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, G. 1977. “The Semitic Languages of Ethiopia and Their Classification.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 40:461-507.
   Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, G. Ed. 1986. Ethiopian Studies: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference, Tel Aviv, 14–17 April 1980. Rotterdam and Boston: A. A. Balkema.
   Google Scholar
• Gouffé, C. 1977–78. “Linguistique tchadique,” in École Pratique des Hautes Études, IVe Section, Sciences Historiques et Philologiques, Annuaire. Pp. 249-292.
   Google Scholar
• Grand’e, B. M. 1972. Vvedenie v sravitel’noe izuienie semitskix jazykov. Moscow: NAUKA.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J. 1965. The Legacy of Canaan 2nd ed. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. H. 1950. “Studies in African Linguistic Classification: IV. Hamito-Semitic.” Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 6:47-63.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. H. 1952. “The Afro-Asiatic (Hamito-Semitic) Present.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 72:1-9.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. H. 1957. Essays in Linguistics. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. H. 1969. Review of I. Fodor, A Fallacy of Contemporary Linguistics. Language 45: 427-432.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. H. 1970. The Languages of Africa 3rd ed. (Research Center for the Language Sciences Publication 25). Bloomington: Indiana Univ.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. H. 1987. Language in the Americas. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. H. 1989. “Classification of American Indian Languages: A Reply to Campbell.” Language 65:107-14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. H. 1990. “Address to NACAL 18.” California Linguistic Newsletter 20/3:8-10.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. H., et al. 1987. “A CA * Book Review: Language in the Americas.” Current Anthropology 28:647-67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, M. R. 1958. “Algonkian-Ritwan: The End of a Controversy.” International Journal of American Linguistics 24:159-73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heine, B. 1979. ‘‘Some Linguistic Observations on the Early History of Africa.” SUGIA—Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 1:37-54.
   Google Scholar
• Heine, B., T. C. Schadeberg, and E. Wolff, Eds. 1981. Die Sprachen Afrikas. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.
   Google Scholar
• Hetzron, R. 1972. Ethiopian Semitic: Studies in Classification (Journal of Semitic Studies Monograph 2). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hetzron, R. 1980. “The Limits of Cushitic.” SUGIA—Sprache und Geschichte in Afrika 2:7-126.
   Google Scholar
• Hetzron, R. forthcoming. The Afroasiatic Languages (Cambridge Language Surveys). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, C. T. 1972. “Lisramic.” Language Sciences 20:13-16.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, C. T. 1973. Review of S. Levin, The Indo-European and Semitic Languages. Language Sciences 24:31-33.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, C. T. 1975. “Egyptian and Survival,” in Bynon and Bynon 1975:171-191.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, C. T. 1976. “Lisramic (Afroasiatic): An Overview,” in Bender 1976:43-65.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, J. H. 1988. Review of Renfrew 1987. Language 64:800-02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junge, F. 1984. “Sprache,” Lexikon der Ägyptologie 5. Cols. 1176-1211.
   Google Scholar
• Jungraithmayr, H. 1972. “Inventaire des langues tchadiques,” in Les langues de l’afrique subsaharienne, (Les langues Ed. G. Manessy dans le monde ancien et moderne 1). Paris: CNRS. Pp. 407-413.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, M. and V. Shevoroshkin. 1988. “Nostratic.” Annual Review of Anthropology 17:309-29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye, A. S. 1984. “The Nature of the Root in Semitic and Egyptian.” Festschrift in Honor of the Twenty-Fifth Anniversary of California State University, Fullerton. Ed. J. Kalir. Fullerton: California State University, Department of Religious Studies. Pp. 93-111.
   Google Scholar
• Kaye, A. S. 1985. Review of Bynon 1984. Language 61:887-891.
   Google Scholar
• Kaye, A. S. 1989 [1990]. Review of V. Shevoroshkin and T. L. Markey, Eds., Typology, Relationship and Time. Journal of Afroasiatic Languages 2:222-26.
   Google Scholar
• Kaye, A. S. 1991. Review of Khan 1988. Journal of the American Oriental Society 111:135-37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, G. 1988. Studies in Semitic Syntax. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, O. 1975. “Geschichte und Probleme der Gliederung der Sprachen Afrikas,” in Die Völker Afrikas und ihre traditionellen Kulturen, Ed. H. Baumann (Studien zur Kulturkunde 34). Pp. 137-373.
   Google Scholar
• Kutscher, E. Y. 1969. “Two ‘Passive’ Constructions in Aramaic in the Light of Persian.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Semitic Studies. Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities. Pp. 132-51.
   Google Scholar
• Leibniz, G. W. 1710. “Brevis designatio meditationum de originibus gentium, ductis potissimum ex indicio linguarum.” Miscellanea Berolinensia … [1], 1 ff.
   Google Scholar
• Lepsius, R. 1844. [Letters to Ehrenberg and Böckh.] Bericht über die zur Bekanntmachung geeigneten Verhandlungen der Königlichen Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin. Pp. 373-406.
   Google Scholar
• Lepsius, R. 1855. Das allgemeine linguistische Alphabet. Berlin: Wilhelm Hertz.
   Google Scholar
• Lepsius, R. 1863. Standard Alphabet for Reducing Unwritten Languages and Foreign Graphic Systems to a Uniform Orthography in European Letters. London: Williams & Norgate. Reprinted 1981. Ed. J. Alan Kemp. (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science I, Amsterdam Classics in Linguistics, 1800-1925). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Lepsius, R. 1880. Nubische Grammatik. Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Leslau, W. 1953. “The Imperfect in South East Semitic.” Journal of the Americal Oriental Society 73:164-66.
   Google Scholar
• Leslau, W. 1962. “A Prefix h in Egyptian, Modern South Arabian, and Hausa.” Africa 32:65-68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslau, W. 1967. “Hypothesis on a Proto-Semitic Marker of the Imperfect in Gurage.” Journal of Near Eastern Studies 26:121-25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslau, W. 1968. “An Archaic Vowel of the Jussive in Gurage, Gafat, and Harari.” Orientalia 37:90-93.
   Google Scholar
• Leslau, W. 1971. “The Geez Imperfect Again.” Proceedings of the 27th International Congress of Orientalists, Ann Arbor 1967. Ed. D. Sinor. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. Pp. 89-90.
   Google Scholar
• Leslau, W. 1988. Fifty Years of Research: Selection of Articles on Semitic, Ethiopie Semitic and Cushitic. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
   Google Scholar
• Matisoff, J. A. 1990. “On Megalocomparison.” Language 66:106-20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinhof, C. 1912. Die Sprachen der Hamiten. Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Moscati, S., Ed. 1964. An Introduction to the Comparative Grammar of the Semitic Languages: Phonology and Morphology (Porta Linguarum Orientalium neue Serie 6). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, F. 1888. Grundriss der Sprachwissenschaft 2nd ed. Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Munson, P. J. 1987. “Africa’s Prehistoric Past.” Africa 2nd ed. Eds. P. M. Martin and P. O’Meara. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Pp. 43-63.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, P. 1977. “Chadic Classification and Reconstructions.” Afroasiatic Linguistics 51 1:1-42.
   Google Scholar
• Leslau, W. 1978. “Chado-Hamitic ‘Adieu’: New Thoughts on Chadic Language Classification,” in Fronzaroli 1978:389-97.
   Google Scholar
• Leslau, W. 1980. The Classification of Chadic within Afroasiatic. Leiden: Universitaire Pers.
   Google Scholar
• Leslau, W. 1987. “Hausa and the Chadic Languages,” The World’s Major Languages. Ed. B. Comrie. New York: Oxford University Press. Pp. 705-723.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, P. and R. Ma. 1966. “Comparative Chadic: Phonology and Lexicon.” Journal of African Languages 5:218-51.
   Google Scholar
• Petrácek, K. 1972. “Die Grenzen des Semitohamitischen: zentralsaharanische und semitohamitische Sprachen in phonologischer Hinsicht.” Archiv Orientâlni 40:6-50.
   Google Scholar
• Rolotsky, H. J. 1961. “Egyptian,” At the Dawn of Civilization: A Background of Biblical Civilization (The World History of the Jewish People 1). Ed. E. A. Speiser. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Pp. 121-34.
   Google Scholar
• Pulgram, E. 1970. Syllable, Word, Nexus, Cursus (Janua Linguarum Series Minor 81). The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Rabin, C. 1983. “Problems of Inter-Branch Comparison,” in Wolff and Meyer-Bahlburg 1983: 65-77.
   Google Scholar
• Reinisch, L. 1873. Der einheitliche Ursprung der Sprachen der Allen Welt. Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Reinisch, L. 1890. Das Zahlwort vier und neun in den chamito-semitischen Sprachen (Sitzungsberichte der Wiener Akademie der Wissenschaften 121/12). Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Renan, E. 1855. Histoire générale et système comparé des langues sémitiques. Paris: Imprimerie impériale.
   Google Scholar
• Renfrew, C. 1989. “The Origins of Indo-European Languages.” Scientific American 261/4 (October): 106-14.
   Google Scholar
• Renfrew, C. et al. 1988. “A CA * Book Review: Archaeology and Language: The Puzzle of Indo-European Origins.” Current Anthropology 29:437-68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapir, E. 1913. “Wiyot and Yurok, Algonkin Languages of California.” American Anthropologist 15:617-46.
   Google Scholar
• Sasse, H.-J. 1981. “Kuschitisch,” in Heine, Schadeberg, and Wolff 1981:187-215.
   Google Scholar
• Sebeok, T. A., Ed. 1970. Linguistics in South West Asia and North Africa (Current Trends in Linguistics 6). The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Sebeok, T. A. 1971. Linguistics in Sub-Saharan Africa (Current Trends in Linguistics 7). The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Terrell, J. 1986. Prehistory in the Pacific Islands. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terry, R. R. 1971. “Chadic,” in Sebeok 1971:443-54.
   Google Scholar
• Thelwall, R. 1986. “Linguistics and Prehistory in an African Perspective: Current Methods and Argumentation,” The Real-World Linguist: Linguistic Applications in the 1980’s. Eds. P. C. Bjarkman and V. Raskin. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. Pp. 323-47.
   Google Scholar
• Thomason, S. 1990. “Hypothesis Generation vs. Hypothesis Testing: A Comparison between Greenberg’s Classifications in Africa and in the Americas.” ms.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, A. N. 1975. “What’s in a Name?” in Bynon and Bynon 1975:471-77.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, A. N. and M. A. Bryan. 1956. The Non-Bantu Languages of North-Eastern Africa (Handbook of African Languages). London: Oxford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, A. N. 1966. Linguistic Analyses: The Non-Bantu Languages of North-Eastern Africa (Handbook of African Languages). London: Oxford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tylor, E. B. 1890. “Anthropology.” Encyclopaedia Britannica 9th ed. 2:107-23. [Abridged reprint in 11th ed. (1911) 2:108-19.]
   Google Scholar
• Vycichl, W. 1974. “Les études chamito-sémitiques à l’Université de Fribourg et le ‘lamékhitique’,” in Caquot and Cohen 1974:60-67.
   Google Scholar
• Weimers, W. E. 1973. African Language Structures. Berkeley and Los Angeles: Univ. of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Westermann, D. 1940. “Sprache und Erziehung,” Völkerkunde von Afrika. Eds. R. T. Baumann and D. Westermann. Essen.
   Google Scholar
• Westphal, E. O. J. 1971. “The Click Languages of Southern and Eastern Africa,” in Sebeok 1971:367-420.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, E. 1981. “Die Berbersprachen,” in Heine, Schadeberg, and Wolff 1981:171-85.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, E. and H. Meyer-Bahlburg, Eds. 1983. Studies in Chadic and Afroasiatic Linguistics. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.
   Google Scholar
• Zaborski, A. 1986. “Can Omotic be Reclassified as West Cushitic?” in Goldenberg 1986: 525-30.
   Google Scholar