REFERENCES
- Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, Massachusetts/London, England: The MIT Press.
- Jackendoff, Ray.. 1991. Semantic structures. Cambridge, Massachusetts/ London, England: The MIT Press.
- Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire and dangerous things. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
- Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Volume I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Langacker, Ronald W. 1990. Concept, image and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar, Volume 11: Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Pike, Kenneth L. 1954. Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior: I, Preliminary Edition. Glendale, CA: Summer Institute of Linguistics. [II, 1955; III 1960; 2nd ed. 1967, The Hague: Mouton.]
- Tuggy, David H. 1981. The transitivity-related morphology of Tetelcingo Nahuatl: An exploration in space grammar. San Diego: University of California Ph.D. Dissertation.
- Tuggy, David H. 1991. “The stem-affix distinction in Orizaba Nahuatl.” Cognitive linguistics 3–3: 237–300.
REFERENCES
- Labov, William. 1966. The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C., Center for Applied Linguistics.
- Wells, John C. 1982. Accents of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
REFERENCES
- Emonds, Joseph E. 1985. A unified theory of syntactic categories. Dordrecht: Foris.
- Hale, Kenneth. 1983. “Warlpiri and grammar of non-configurational languages.” Natural language and linguistic theory 1: 5–47.
REFERENCES
- Becker, Th. 1990. Analogie und morphologische Theorie. Münchner Universitäts-Schriften—Philosophische Fakultät. Studien zur Theoretischen Linguistik, 11. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
- Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
- Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and relate problems. Cambridge: University Press.
- Comrie, Bernard. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: University Press.
- Dahl, Osten. 1985. Aspect and tense systems. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
- Fleishman, Suzanne. 1990. Tense and narrativity: From medieval performance to modern fiction. Austin: University of Texas Press.
- Flier, Michael and R.D. Brecht (eds.). 1985. Issues in Russian morphosyntax. Columbus, Ohio: Slavica Publishers.
- Flier, Michael and Alan Timberlake (eds.). 1985. The scope of Slavic aspect. UCLA Slavic Studies, Vol. 12. Columbus, Ohio: Slavica.
- Forsyth, J. 1970. A grammar of aspect. Cambridge: University Press.
- Givón, Talmy (ed.). 1979. Discourse and syntax. Syntax and semantics. Vol. 12. New York: Academic Press.
- Hoffmann, K. 1967. Der Injunktiv im Veda. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
- Hopper, Paul J. 1979. “Aspect and foregrounding in discourse.” In Givón (ed.), pp. 213–41.
- Givón (ed.). 1982. Tense-aspect: Between semantics and pragmatics. Typological Studies in Language (TSL), Vol. 1. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
- Hopper, Paul J. and Sandra A. Thompson. 1980. “Transitivity in grammar and discourse.” Language 56, 251–299.
- Kurytowicz, Jerzy. 1964. The inflectional categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg: Carl Win-ter.
- Lakoff, George. 1982. Categories and cognitive models. Berkeley: Berkeley Cognitive Science Report No. 2.
- Mourelatos, A. 1978. “Events, processes, and states.” Linguistics and philosophy 2: 415–34.
- Renou, L. 1925. La valeur du parfait dans les hymnes védiques. Paris: Champion.
- Ruipérez, M.S. 1954. Estructura del sistema de aspectos y tiempos del verbo griego antiguo. Análisis functional sincrónica. Salamanca: Colegio trilinguo de la Universidad.
- Timberlake, Alan. 1982. “Invariance and the Syntax of Russian Aspect.” In Hopper (ed.), pp. 305–31.
- Timberlake, Alan. 1985. “The temporal schemata of Russian predicates.” In Flier and Brecht (eds.), pp. 35–57.
- Verkuyl, H.J. 1972. On the Compositional Nature of Aspects. Dordrecht: Reidel.
REFERENCES
- Francis, W. Nelson. 1990. “Review on Early Middle English syntax by Lilo Moessner”. Language, 66: 646–47.
- Jones, Charles. 1972. An introduction to Middle English. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc.
- Lass, Roger. 1987. The shape of English: structure and history. London: J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd.
- Mitchell, Bruce. 1985. Old English syntax, I-II. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Mustanoja, Tauno F. 1960. A Middle English syntax, I. Mémoires de la Société Néophilologique, 23. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
- Peitsara, Kirsti. Forthcoming. “On the development of the English agent with by”. In Proceedings from the sixth international conference on English historical linguistics (ICEHL 6). Helsinki, 23–26 May, 1990.
- Peitsara, Kirsti. Forthcoming. “On the development of the fry-agent in English”. In Introduction to the Helsinki Corpus eds. Matti Rissanen et al.
- Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York: Longman.
- Strang, Barbara M.H. 1970. A history of English. London and Colchester: Methuen & Co Ltd.
REFERENCES
- Bailey, Matilda H. 1967. “The utility of phonic generalizations in grades one through six.” The reading teacher 20: 413–18.
- Burmeister, Lou E. 1968. “Usefulness of phonic generalizations.” The reading teacher 21, 4: 349–56.
- Burmeister, Lou E. 1968. “Vowel pairs.” The reading teacher 21, 5: 445–452.
- Emans, Robert. 1967. “When two vowels go walking and other such things.” The reading teacher 21, 3: 262–69.
- Hanna, Paul R. and Hanna, Jean S. 1965. “Regularity in English spelling.” National elementary principal 45: Nov: 20–33.
- Hanna, Paul R., Hanna, Jean S., Hodges, Richard E., and Rudorf, E. Hugh. 1966. Phonemegrapheme correspondences as cues to spelling improvement, Washington, D.C. Office of Education.
- Ruddell, R.B. 1967. “Reading instruction in first grade with varying emphasis on the regularity of grapheme-phoneme correspondences and the relation of language structure to meaning—Extended in second grade.” The reading teacher, 20: 730–39.
- Winkley, C. 1966. “Which accent generalizations are worth teaching?” The reading teacher, 19: 219–24.
REFERENCES
- Bomhard, Allan R. 1984. Toward Proto-Nostratic: A new approach to the comparison of Proto-Indo-European and Proto-Afroasiatic. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Dixon, R.M.W. 1980. The languages of Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Dyen, Isidore. 1965. A lexicostatistical classification of the Austronesian languages. International Journal of American Linguistics, Memoir 19.
- Greenberg, Joseph. 1987. Language in the Americas. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Helimskij, Evgenij. 1989. “K ocenke nadežnosti indoevropejsko-semitskih leksičeskih sopostavlenij.” Paleobalkanistika i antičnost’. Moscow: Nauka, 13–20.
- Helimskij, Evgenij. 1990. Rev. of: Sravnitel'no-istoričeskoe izučenie jazykov raznyh semej: Teorija lingvističeskoj rekonstrukcii. Voprosy jazykoznanija, No. 4, 138–45.
- Helimsky, Eugene. 1987. “A “new approach” to Nostratic comparison.” Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 107, No. 1, 97–100.
- Helimsky, Eugene. 1991. Rev. of: Gerhard Doerfer, Grundwort und Sprachmischung: Eine Untersuchung an Hand von Körperteilbezeichnungen. Word 43: 322–30.
- Illič-Svityč, V.M. 1971–1984. Opyt sravnenija nostratičeskih jazykov. I-III. Moscow: Nauka.
- Rix, Helmut. 1976. Historische Grammatik des Griechischen: Laut-und Formenlehre. Darm-stadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
- Schmalstieg, William R. 1980. Indo-European linguistics: A new synthesis. University Park & London: Pennsylvania State University Press.
- Starostin, Sergej. 1991. Altajskaja problema I proishočdenie japonskogo jazyka. Moscow: Nauka.
REFERENCES
- Anderson, Judi Lynn. 1989. Comaltepec Chinantec syntax. Studies in Chinantec Languages 3. Summer Institute of Linguistics and The University of Texas at Arlington Publications in Linguistics 89.
- Dryer, Matthew S. 1991. “Review of Lealao Chinantec syntax by James E. Rupp and Comaltepec Chinantec syntax by Judi Lynn Anderson.” Word 42: 319–22.
- Harris, James. 1982. Syllable structure and stress in Spanish: A nonlinear analysis. Linguistic Inquiry monograph 8. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
- Mester, R. Armin & Junko Itô. 1989. “Feature predictability and underspecification: Palatal prosody in Japanese mimetics.” Language 65: 258–93.
- Okell, John. 1969. A reference grammar of colloquial Burmese. London: Oxford University Press.
- Rensch, Calvin R. 1989. An etymological dictionary of the Chinantec languages. Studies in Chinantec Languages 1. Summer Institute of Linguistics and The University of Texas at Arlington Publications in Linguistics 87.
- Rupp, James E. 1989. Lealao Chinantec syntax. Studies in Chinantec Languages 2. Summer Institute of Linguistics and The University of Texas at Arlington Publications in Linguistics 88.
- Yu Cho, Young-mee. 1990. Parameters of consonantal assimilation. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.