Forms of they with singular noun phrase antecedents: Evidence from current educated English usage

REFERENCES

• Algeo, John. 1991. “Sweet are the usages of diversity,” WORD 42: 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, Dennis. 1986. Grammar and gender. New Haven: Yale UP.
   Google Scholar
• Bate, Barbara. 1978. “Nonsexist language use in transition.” Journal of communication 28: 139–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodine, Ann. 1975. “Androcentrism in prescriptive grammar: singular ‘they’, sex-indefinite ‘he’, and ‘he or she’.” Language in society 4: 129–46.
   Google Scholar
• Bosch, Peter. 1983. Agreement and anaphora: A study of the role of pronouns in syntax and discourse. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, Ruth. 1985. “The use of sex- and number-neutral they in standard English.” M.A. Thesis. U of Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, Robert L. 1984. “The avoidance of androcentric generics.” International journal of the sociology of language 50: 5–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ecker, Michael. 1985. “They is no substitute for the right pronoun” (“Letters to the editor”). The chronicle of higher education, 16, 33.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, W. Nelson. 1958. The Structure of American English. New York: The Ronald Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gilman, E. Ward, ed. 1989. Webster's dictionary of English Usage. Springfield, MA: Merriam Webster.
   Google Scholar
• Hairston, Maxine. 1981. “Not all errors are created equal: Nonacademic readers in the professions respond to lapses in usage.” College English 43: 794–806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jespersen, Otto. 1894. Progress in language. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kingsolver, Pamela Schroeder, and Harold V. Cordry. 1987. “Gender and the press: An update.” Advances in gender and communication research, ed. Lawrence B. Nadler, Marjorie Keeshan Nadler, and William R. Todd-Mancillas. Lanham, Md.: U Press of America, pp. 307–15.
   Google Scholar
• Lamberts, J.J. 1972. A short introduction to English usage. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, Sarah. 1980. “Words and women: A transatlantic view.” American speech 35: 129–31.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, Sterling A. 1929. The doctrine of correctness in English usage 1700–1800. Madison: U of Wisconsin Studies in Language and Literature, no. 25.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, Sterling A. 1932. Current English usage, English Monographs No. 1. Chicago: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Marckwardt, Albert H. and Fred G. Walcott. 1938. Facts about current English usage. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, Miriam Watkins. 1990. “Current generic pronoun usage: An empirical study.” American speech 65: 228–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers, Miriam Watkins. Forthcoming. “Current generic pronoun usage: evidence from the writing of two generations.” Centennial usage studies., ed. Greta D. Little and Michael B. Montgomery.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsen, Alleen Pace. 1984. “Winning the great he/she battle.” College English 46: 151–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunberg, Geoffrey. 1983. “The decline of grammar.” The Atlantic Monthly, December, 31–46. Oxford English dictionary, the compact edition, vol. II, P-Z. 1971. New York: Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1972. A grammar of contemporary English. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Randall, Phyllis R. 1985. “Sexist language and speech communication texts: Another case of benign neglect.” Communication Education 34: 128–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sklar, Elizabeth S. 1983. “Sexist grammar revisited.” College English 45: 348–58.
   Google Scholar
• Sklar, Elizabeth S. 1988. “The tribunal of use: Agreement in indefinite constructions.” College Composition and Communication 39: 410–22.
   Google Scholar
• Whitley, M. Stanley. 1978. “Person and number in the use of we, you, and they.” American speech 53: 18–39.
   Google Scholar